All you okes are quick to flame this guy, but what about the one accused who confirmed under oath that he had nothing to do with it and the police forcibly coerced him into lying about that fact.
its pretty clear the other accused would use Shrien as a contractor as an excuse so that its not their premeditated plan.
Why would the above accused claim that Shrien had nothing to do with it? By stating that, the blame falls fully on him. To entertain the conspiracy theorists out there, maybe Shriens family made under the table payments to the accused's family so that he would lie about the the original deal. Or Shrien is actually innocent. What motive would a rich indian guy have in killing his two week old pretty good looking bride? I cant see anything and havent read about possible motives.
Im not convinced, imo Shrien is completely innocent until the SAPS can pull some concrete out of this mess.