The Audi Thread

If the A7 was an 80s concept.

426269594_892382356227488_6542122019331992932_n.jpg
 
Had 1 , although it was okay you cant beat a V6. I6 or even an 8 cylinder, they push out power with minimal efforts
I had that polo bluemotion 3 cyl, never again. Super economical though. 1000km on 35l diesel iirc.
 
It was always a stupid thing to do, probably there was a marketing budget that needed to be spent.


Time for another reminder of this piece of excellent satire...

 
Same here - I have now started to refer to it as the AR value, much like they had the PR value for AMD and Cyrix processors in the 90s. Intel said PR stood for Pentium Rating whereas AMD and Cyrix said it stood for Performance Rating.

AR according to me = AMG Rating.
AR according to Audi = Audi Rating.
Called 2 years ahead of time.
 
They should just use PS numbers. Audi A5 130 = 130PS (HP)

There was absolutely nothing wrong with the good, old fashioned engine capacity naming, someone should really tell ze Germans that no one cares about the size of their mannschaft, the fear that someone will think it's inadequate is what got us into this mess to begin with.
 
Aaah, yes, AMG's make more sense, like the C43 AMG which is a 4.3l V8 2.0T I4 but used to be a 4.3l V8 3.0TT V6.
Correct - they really should just stop with those model numbers. Like in the 90s when a 2.5L E36 was a 323i and not a 325i because it had cloth seats.

Processors kept that charade going until mutli-core became a thing, I think you could still get an Athlon X2 6000 which was just a dual core 3GHz but then they stopped with the silly "PR" values.

Now my cars are way ahead of this - it's the kind of cars where if you know, you know. :sneaky:
The one has a turbo badge, but it's not silver like the plebs in their 1.4 turbos - oh no - the letters are black! Jinne pappie - you know what that means? We're talking a sestienhonderd-krag-masjien!
The other just says Ecoflex, but if you read between the letter you know it actually says nege-honderd-nege-en-neentig-cc!
 
Audi is finally ditching the confusing naming system for its models

It will instead introduce simpler badging moving forward. Thank the motoring gods

Audi has finally come to its senses and realised that issuing a car with a badge detailing its estimated power band doesn’t really… work.

The ‘nomenclature’ system was introduced back in 2017 as a reformat to its model naming code, and yes, we were (and still are) just as puzzled as you. It essentially took an already confusing metric, which highlighted a given car’s engine capacity, and replaced it with a series of numbers signalling a car’s power, between 30 (109-128bhp) and 70 (536bhp or more). Praise the heavens, it’s now in the process of being dropped.

We’re already seeing the advantages take shape since some of Audi’s current large SUV lineup are adopting much simpler trim disambiguations, including the Q8 e-tronand the recently revealed Q6 e-tron. The latter, for instance, is only being launched as an entry-level, all-wheel drive ‘Quattro’ and a flashier ‘SQ6’, with a range-topping ‘RSQ6’ expected at a later date. Can you feel the headache easing?

We expect this change to roll over to any petrol and diesel-powered models forecast, too, like a future A5 or A7 (and their corresponding trim levels). And while they will likely still adopt some name extensions to provide partition, such as TDI (Turbocharged Direct Injection) or TFSI (Turbo Fuel Stratified Injection), this too could be phased out moving forward.

 

Attachments

  • 1711575702959.png
    1711575702959.png
    33.4 KB · Views: 14
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X