The Brexit Thread

[Hamish McPanji]

I did, look up ^^^, did you miss it?

It’s about 3 or 4 pages back if you want to read it in situ.

Do you know who you're arguing with?

 

[Pitbull]

Do you know who you're arguing with?

Look at his original post on page 142 I think it was, then look at what he quoted.

You also part of this dishonest clan of cultural Marxists now? I missed your name being quoted by Cerebus, I assumed you're not. I seem to have been wrong

 

[Dave]

Do you know who you're arguing with?

I’ve come to realise that, it’s a lot worse than normal though, I thought.

 

[Dave]

Look at his original post on page 142 I think it was, then look at what he quoted.

You also part of this dishonest clan of cultural Marxists now? I missed your name being quoted by Cerebus, I assumed you're not. I seem to have been wrong

Show me where it says anything about money laundering...

 

[Pitbull]

Show me where it says anything about money laundering...

View attachment 575855

At that point in time, and the reason you posted it. The news feed said: "Banks being investigated for Money laundering, and why. At that stage it had NOTHING to do with Electoral laws and the likes. That came in after and you were vindicated to a certain degree. It does not take away from the fact that you linked the Money Laundering investigation to "Good News" regarding Brexit. When in fact it had fark all to do with Brexit, apart from the donations being linked to Brexit.

 

[Dave]

At that point in time, and the reason you posted it. The news feed said: "Banks being investigated for Money laundering, and why. At that stage it had NOTHING to do with Electoral laws and the likes. That came in after and you were vindicated to a certain degree. It does not take away from the fact that you linked the Money Laundering investigation to "Good News" regarding Brexit. When in fact it had fark all to do with Brexit, apart from the donations being linked to Brexit.

No it didn’t, don’t make up lies now.

My quote is the entirety of the news feed at the time, and it changed to the full story shortly after which is still readable at the link now.

https://news.sky.com/story/national-crime-agency-launches-investigation-into-arron-banks-11541786

Here it is again; note the “more follows” that’s the end of the breaking story.




So, once again, where has money laundering been mentioned other than by you?

 

[Dave]

At that point in time, and the reason you posted it. The news feed said: "Banks being investigated for Money laundering, and why. At that stage it had NOTHING to do with Electoral laws and the likes.

I should have just answered this crap like this

 

[Pitbull]

No it didn’t, don’t make up lies now.

My quote is the entirety of the news feed at the time, and it changed to the full story shortly after which is still readable at the link now.

https://news.sky.com/story/national-crime-agency-launches-investigation-into-arron-banks-11541786

Here it is again; note the “more follows” that’s the end of the breaking story.

View attachment 575859


So, once again, where has money laundering been mentioned other than by you?

I read that as you posted it, there was more, you know it for a fact. Just being extremely deceitful. I never expected that from you.

This part was there and you know it full well. I even asked you if you read it? You then went off the rails...

Pro-Brexit campaigner Arron Banks is facing a criminal inquiry into "suspected electoral law offences" relating to the EU referendum campaign.


The investigation was launched by the National Crime Agency (NCA) after a referral by the Electoral Commission.

The watchdog said there were "reasonable grounds" to suspect that Mr Banks was not the true source of £8m in loans made to the Better for the Country organisation, which ran his group Leave.EU.
A "number of criminal offences may have been committed", it added, also referring Leave.EU's chief executive Elizabeth Bilney for investigation.

Then had a thing at the bottom saying:

This is a developing story

I asked you if you even read it before making a fool of yourself...

 

[Temujin]

Seems like the leavers are willing to turn a blind eye to someone breaking the law if they doing so to help their cause.

Not at all... he must face the music... but painting him has being the reason in an 'oh look, he contributed 2mil in dodgy funds to leave campaign, its all a scam, it must be null and void outrage'... pfft, its a joke, gotta blame someone cos obviously people aren't capable of thinking for themselves

 

[Pitbull]

I should have just answered this crap like this

View attachment 575861

Exactly... I'm astounded at how extremely dishonest you are now.
To what gain? Prevent being proven to have been wrong from the onset?

Ok then. Doesn't phase me

 

[Pitbull]

Not at all... he must face the music... but painting him has being the reason in an 'oh look, he contributed 2mil in dodgy funds to leave campaign, its all a scam, it must be null and void outrage'... pfft, its a joke, gotta blame someone cos obviously people aren't capable of thinking for themselves

There was donations to the tune of 8mil, of which it seems 2mil made it the actual "funding"

This has been the story from the start. More things like staff and office space has now also been uncovered. The main issue here to begin with was the laundering of the money. To which it seems that 6mil is "unaccounted"

 

[Dave]

I read that as you posted it, there was more, you know it for a fact. Just being extremely deceitful. I never expected that from you.

This part was there and you know it full well. I even asked you if you read it? You then went off the rails...



Then had a thing at the bottom saying:

This is a developing story

You really are desperately grasping at straws.

There was nothing else in the breaking news and it never mentioned money laundering.

Being so desperate to make up lies to try and justify your crap just shows how poor your character is.

I asked you if you even read it before making a fool of yourself...

You asked that because the story had updated to what it there now, liar.

 

[Pitbull]

You asked that because the story had updated to what it there now, liar.

Why would I ask you if you read the article then if that part you posted was the only part of that news feed? I actually went into the article and that is why I asked you? You obviously didn't and you're confirming it now again.

So good luck trying to wiggle out of that...

 

[Unhappy1]

Not at all... he must face the music... but painting him has being the reason in an 'oh look, he contributed 2mil in dodgy funds to leave campaign, its all a scam, it must be null and void outrage'... pfft, its a joke, gotta blame someone cos obviously people aren't capable of thinking for themselves

I dont think a single person here has suggested the results are now null and void because of banks, its seems you are trying to manufacture outrage.

 

[Pitbull]

I dont think a single person here has suggested the results are now null and void because of banks, its seems you are trying to manufacture outrage.

O contraire, Dave actually came out and said he won't deny there could have been a different result because of it.

 

[Temujin]

I dont think a single person here has suggested the results are now null and void because of banks, its seems you are trying to manufacture outrage.

Maybe not here... but this is EXACTLY what its about... looking for a reason, any reason to invalidate the results and have a re-run

 

[Unhappy1]

O contraire, Dave actually came out and said he won't deny there could have been a different result because of it.

Ok but thats not the same as saying the results are now void because there could have been a different result.

Maybe not here... but this is EXACTLY what its about... looking for a reason, any reason to invalidate the results and have a re-run

No i dont think so, what it really should be about is prosecuting a slimeball.

 

[Pitbull]

Ok but thats not the same as saying the results are now void because there could have been a different result.

Not what I'm claiming. It does prove that anything will try and be used as some form of excuse as pointed out earlier in the thread by Temujin

 

[Dave]

I dont think a single person here has suggested the results are now null and void because of banks, its seems you are trying to manufacture outrage.

O contraire, Dave actually came out and said he won't deny there could have been a different result because of it.

More lies?

Are you delusional or a schizophrenic? Or just a desperate little man who makes up lies to pretend he has an arguing point?

Where’ve I even referred to the result being null and void? Please link the post.


You know, I can argue with a racist, I can argue with an ignorant c**t, but I really struggle to want to argue with a dishonest liar...

 

[Hamish McPanji]

Look at his original post on page 142 I think it was, then look at what he quoted.

You also part of this dishonest clan of cultural Marxists now? I missed your name being quoted by Cerebus, I assumed you're not. I seem to have been wrong

Protip: Maybe if you don't know much about a subject, you should read up on it before actually going in acting all knowledgeable. You don't come off well when you do that.