Vox Populi Vox Dei
High Tory
So because the Spelman-Cooper amendment was passed, the government are now ordering a three-line whip against their own motion. Only need 2 to switch. Now let's see what the Tory Remoaner ministers do...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
So because the Spelman-Cooper amendment was passed, the government are now ordering a three-line whip against their own motion. Only need 2 to switch. Now let's see what the Tory Remoaner ministers do...
All yes, the snivelling cowards are abstaining...unlike Brexiteers who resigned. We know exactly who is honourable and who is not...
"Theresa May has been defeated by four votes, because MPs have backed the Spelman amendment ruling out a no-deal Brexit for good by 312 votes to 308."
who writes such gutter trash?!?
Theresa May WANTED no-deal to be shot down, hence, she won.
ffs idiots, pay attention!
You're asleep if you think May is not over the moon about the prospect of her parliament voting to take no-deal off the table completely.Pay attention, NBFTW. She didn't want the Spelman amendment, which is the vote she lost. You know, as it says right there.
No wonder you're confused so often about basic things.
At this rate, we'll be leaving the EU, but the EU will never leave us. Wonder what the eventual "deal" is going to be? Any guesses?
that's easy: cancelling brexit, either outright or in all measures that matterAt this rate, we'll be leaving the EU, but the EU will never leave us. Wonder what the eventual "deal" is going to be? Any guesses?
You're asleep if you think May is not over the moon about the prospect of her parliament voting to take no-deal off the table completely.
Prime Minister Theresa May’s motion on Wednesday that “rejects the United Kingdom leaving the European Union without a Withdrawal Agreement.”
Again failing to read, she wanted no deal permanently off the table ... shall I grab a crayon? She creamed herself with the passing of the Spelman amendment, guaranteed. You have to learn the difference between what people say and what they want.It's not a secret that she wanted 'no deal' voted down. That was literally the government's (i.e. her) motion.
More than enough proof against that on this very forum, when I'm mistaken, in this case, you are.Are you physically incapable of admitting you were mistaken?
Again failing to read, she wanted no deal permanently off the table ... shall I grab a crayon? She creamed herself with the passing of the Spelman amendment, guaranteed. You have to learn the difference between what people say and what they want.
- ERG MPs beginning to say they will vote for the deal at a third meaningful vote on the condition May goes
- other ultra hardliners saying go for election
- genuine fury that May is letting Remain rebels get away with breaking three line whip

May voted against brexit in the referendum, has always been a remoaner, will always be a remoaner. This was evident every step of the way during the purposefully incompetent and dragged out "negotiations".Ah right, so we're back to ignoring what people actually do and introduce in Parliament, and instead relying on what NBFTW dreams up. Carry on.
Good thing the retarded political class of Britain took no-deal off the table then, we wouldn't want them to use the only leverage they had and end up costing the EU ...Not quoting as it's in French but Euler Hermes (major credit insurance company) estimates in a new report that French companies lost 6 billion € in exports since 2016 due to Brexit side effects