.Henning's father, Ivan Sainic told the court that Nico was the only person who could have benefited from her daughter's murder.
Father? Her? SAPA at its best!
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
.Henning's father, Ivan Sainic told the court that Nico was the only person who could have benefited from her daughter's murder.
I am intrigued as to why police/prosecution cannot establish/prove a link with her husband?
Why would none of these men - not even the ones who have been imprisoned already - spill the beans on the husband and implicate him? I find it absurd and unbelievable that they would have simply decided by themselves to kill the woman.
The ones who confessed did not have direct contact with Nico Henning I assume, so they cant testify to that.
Friends phone each other and the calls are not kept and recorded, so that makes that line of evidence useless (phone records). I asumed they did not use sms's because sms's would leave a trail of text.
I am intrigued as to why police/prosecution cannot establish/prove a link with her husband?
Why would none of these men - not even the ones who have been imprisoned already - spill the beans on the husband and implicate him? I find it absurd and unbelievable that they would have simply decided by themselves to kill the woman.
What I am trying to say is why do the ones that DID have a link to the husband and agreed to kill her on his request, not admit it? If life - or a few years - prison is awaiting you, you are very likely to out your co-perpetrator in order to shift the blame and lesson your own sentence.
What I am trying to say is why do the ones that DID have a link to the husband and agreed to kill her on his request, not admit it? If life - or a few years - prison is awaiting you, you are very likely to out your co-perpetrator in order to shift the blame and lesson your own sentence.
Maybe the husband was clever enough not be linked to them.. or he paid them good money to keep quiet..
Maybe.
I am mulling the exact same questions about Donovan Moodley. It was apparent, according to Piet Byleveld, that Moodley did not act alone, yet he never gave up his accomplices.
I fail to understand why . It's not like there is honour amongst thieves -and murderers, for that matter.
Yip.. can be only money IMHO. They take the fall, and after release they get their money (or similar)