The coming wars in 2012

killadoob

Honorary Master
Joined
Jan 30, 2004
Messages
46,571
Reaction score
17
Location
South Africa.
Please note this has anti west stuff!!!!!!!!!! but it is a good article non the less.


2011 will be remembered as the year the US, Britain, France and Israel went into Imperial Overdrive in North Africa and the Middle East. Will 2012 be remembered as the year those same Western Allies unleashed World War III?

*It is not news anymore to say that the West will soon attack Iran, maybe Syria. They have been threatening to do that for years now, certainly ever since the failed Israeli invasion into Southern Lebanon in mid-2006, when they were routed by Hezbollah.

So what is different today? For starters, general circumstances have changed dramatically in the Region. Genuine popular dissent inside key Muslim countries has been used by the Western Allies to train, fund and arm local criminal and terrorist organizations, dubbed “freedom fighters”, as their proxies.

Country after country has fallen victim to the CIA’s, MI6’s and Mossad’s “dirty tricks departments”, and other Western-style terrorist organizations. Results range from moderate “regime change” in Tunisia and Algeria; via horrendous “violence by our boys” in Egypt, Yemen and Bahrain; all the way to outright military attack, civil war and political assassination. Such as the one in Libya, where Hillary Clinton boisterously laughed when she learned Muammar Gaddafi had been murdered live on TV by “her thugs”.

The whole region has been set on fire. Not that other regions of the world are not on fire too; however the pyrotechnics used by the Global Power Elite vary in nature in each geography. For example, Europe, the US and Britain are being set alight using financial terrorism resembling a neutron bomb, which kills people off while leaving assets and banks standing.

Now in Iran the stage seems set for a final show-down. It has taken so long only because Israeli, British and US planners are not stupid; they know that messing with Iran is not like messing with Iraq or Pakistan or Afghanistan or Libya. Messing with Iran will bring Western Allies very dangerously close to messing with Russia and China. If I were in their shoes, I would not do that. Unless…

Unless World War III is what they are looking for. Now, why would they do that? Perhaps, because they have realized that there is just no peaceful way of achieving their dream of World Government. Perhaps because they have understood that the financial quicksand they have backed themselves into is so devastating that it cannot be cleaned up with purely financial, monetary and “legal” measures, in which case…

Nothing beats a good war! Perhaps, because wildcard Israel is so very much in control (or should I say, out of control) that they are imposing the “Sampson Option” not only on themselves, but also on their controlled Western Allies and the whole planet if need be. “After me, the Flood!”

Things in the Strait of Hormuz are extremely dangerous and volatile. After being systematically threatened with unilateral military attack, invasion, and even nuclear strikes, now the Iranians are showing their muscle too. On 24th December, Iran began a 10-day spate of military maneuvers in the strait that has all but put the US, UK and Israel on red alert. A US aircraft carrier force is now in the area and their helicopters have flown dangerously close to Iranian forces. Any spark could set off a conflagration.

Meanwhile, Syria is falling into meltdown. Meanwhile, Israel is preparing “Cast Lead II” over and inside Gaza. Meanwhile, Hezbollah is ready to strike Israel with tens of thousands of very deadly short-range “Katyushka” rockets.

A key sign of impending war is an article just published in the January/February 2012 issue of Foreign Affairs, the official journal of the New York-based Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). It carried the ominous title of Time to Attack Iran: Why a Strike Is the Least Bad Option, by Matthew Kroenig. This man was, until last July, special advisor to the Pentagon for “Defense Strategy on Iran” – Newspeak for “let’s beat the hell out of Iran”.

The CFR is the key Global Power Elite think-tank, founded in 1919 together with its London sister organization, the Royal Institute of International Affairs (also known as Chatham House). Its more than 4500 members are deeply embedded into the uppermost echelons of public and private power in the US, controlling banking, industry, media, academia, the military and government.

Key government posts are always controlled by one of their lot, irrespective of whether the Democrats or Republicans are in power. The CFR is integrated into an intricate network of similar organizations that includes the Trilateral Commission, Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Group, Project for a New American Century, Bilderberg and others. They all operate in streamlined coordination, consistency, synchronization and – most important – with a common purpose.

In his article, Mr Kroenig, assesses how “American pundits and policymakers have been debating whether the United States should attack Iran and attempt to eliminate its nuclear facilities,” concluding that, “The only thing worse than military action against Iran would be an Iran armed with nuclear weapons.”

He warns against “skeptics of military action (who) fail to appreciate the true danger that a nuclear-armed Iran would pose to US interests in the Middle East and beyond.”

This reflects Defense Secretary Leon Panetta’s recent remarks when addressing the Brookings Institution’s pro-Israel “Saban Forum” bringing together US and Israeli military strategists that repeated the usual Baby Bush “all options are on the table” threats.

Mr. Kroenig talks of the “dangers of deterrence” and gives the Obama Administration unequivocal advice: “The truth is that a military strike intended to destroy Iran’s nuclear program, if managed carefully, could spare the region and the world a very real threat and dramatically improve the long-term national security of the United States.”

As these pyromaniacs get ready to ignite the regional and global powder keg, one key question looms ever larger: what will Russia do?

http://rt.com/news/iran-us-war-military-005/

Just read the article and ignore the anti west stuff. Very good article and wow it sounds hectic hahah. So much war coming or will it?

Very good article apart from anti west stuff which is fine for me but i am sure the more sensitive folks might flip their lids. Please let's keep it civil, personal attacks only end in locked threads.
 
I'm one of those "sensitive" folks who cannot identify with any other lifestyle but my own. Sorry! Maybe it is my age, but I am yet to see an example of a freer lifestyle (that was not created in a Hollywood studio).

So, warts and all, I would rather support the "evil" West.
 
I'm one of those "sensitive" folks who cannot identify with any other lifestyle but my own. Sorry! Maybe it is my age, but I am yet to see an example of a freer lifestyle (that was not created in a Hollywood studio).

So, warts and all, I would rather support the "evil" West.

The article has nothing to do with who you support though.
 
Even if there is a world war we won't be involved in any form. one of the few good things about the current government
 
More off the wall beedee beedee fantasy toilet crap from the MyBB King of junk media conspiracy theories.
 
failed Israeli invasion into Southern Lebanon in mid-2006, when they were routed by Hezbollah. That is a joke
 
failed Israeli invasion into Southern Lebanon in mid-2006, when they were routed by Hezbollah. That is a joke

How so? The resistance pretty much made the idf look like a bunch of fools by the end of that conflict.
 
There is just a bunch of posturing. Obama is up for re-relection on an anti-war platform. No way will he risk losing out on another term. Also, there is a full scale recession in Europe and they don't have money for another war.

Due to political reasons Iran is safe in 2012.
 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2006_Lebanon_War

Keep in mind that I consider myself neutral in this argument.

Basically the Lebanese forces lost between two and five (Depending on who you believe.) times the fighters that Israel did not to mention the high Lebanese civilian death toll.

I'll leave you to draw your own conclusions

The zionists had air dominance and a massive advantage in numbers yet it failed in all of its objectives (except killing civilians of course) while suffering significant losses in men and equipment, in short, they lost. Facts are facts.
 
The zionists had air dominance and a massive advantage in numbers yet it failed in all of its objectives (except killing civilians of course) while suffering significant losses in men and equipment, in short, they lost. Facts are facts.

Wishful thinking :whistle:

Those Arab's haven't totally forgotten the 6 day war !


[video=youtube;vdgWuQIpCb8]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vdgWuQIpCb8[/video]

[video=youtube;E63AKJpa1Tk]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E63AKJpa1Tk[/video]
The Six-Day War, also known as the 1967 Arab-Israeli War, the Third Arab-Israeli War, Six Days' War, an‑Naksah (The Setback), or the June War, was fought between Israel and Arab neighbors Egypt, Jordan, and Syria.
 
Lets kill everybody, then our selves. The planet can only benefit.
 
The zionists had air dominance and a massive advantage in numbers yet it failed in all of its objectives (except killing civilians of course) while suffering significant losses in men and equipment, in short, they lost. Facts are facts.

I don't know the answer to this but what were the objectives?
 
I don't know the answer to this but what were the objectives?

Neuter Hezbollah AFAIK. Which Lebanon and the UN promised would be done if Israel withdrew, which Israel did, and then the promise was reneged upon. Hence why Israel, and anyone with half a brain, puts no stock in what the UN says or does.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X