The Great Reset Thread

Grant said:
Fool?

I own 4 residential properties in Cape Town one in umdloti, another in surrey along with a mixed commercial / retail building in the parliamentary precinct in Cape Town.

How many do you own, you broederbond peasant ?
Click to expand...
Well done with your success. Will you be equally happy to have the state own your properties and having to ask permission for anything you want to do with it or decide when they deem fit that somebody else should be living there ?
 
noxibox said:
Traditional capitalism is where almost everything is owned by the wealthy and everyone else is effectively a serf. In traditional capitalism the wealthy also own the government. They and those in government work together to make sure the peasants stay in line.
Click to expand...

You are thinking of feudalism.
 
etienne_marais said:
Well done with your success. Will you be equally happy to have the state own your properties and having to ask permission for anything you want to do with it or decide when they deem fit that somebody else should be living there ?
Click to expand...
What is the purpose of owning fixed property?
If you think it provides security, think again.
Consider the current state of politics in this country, and then for a few moments think of that of the history of the continent.
And now, do you still believe bring anchored to fixed property here is an advantage?

Let me ask you this, which would be your priority:
The safety and freedom of your family to be able to move from danger.
Or,a little piece of land you can call your own?
 
noxibox said:
Traditional capitalism is where almost everything is owned by the wealthy and everyone else is effectively a serf. In traditional capitalism the wealthy also own the government. They and those in government work together to make sure the peasants stay in line.
Click to expand...
Chances are that compared to the parking lot attendant you are super rich and essentially a capitalist. You, nor I, engage in any activity that prevents the attendant from upping his skills, but in contrast the Communist government does not ensure proper education paths while wasting money on social schemes.
 
Grant said:
What is the purpose of owning fixed property?
If you think it provides security, think again.
Consider the current state of politics in this country, and then for a few moments think of that of the history of the continent.
And now, do you still believe bring anchored to fixed property here is and advantage?

Let me ask you this, which would be your priority:
The safety and freedom of your family to be able to move from danger.
Or,a little piece of land?
Click to expand...
That's why I believe in the nation state, patriotism, full sovereignty and non-racial nationalism where my freedom is guaranteed.

If things get even worse in S.A. and you want to move, you will have to rent alongside all the others fleeing hardship, if you even qualify and the state does not decide for you.
 
etienne_marais said:
That's why I believe in the nation state, patriotism, full sovereignty and non-racial nationalism where my freedom is guaranteed.

If things get even worse in S.A. and you want to move, you will have to rent alongside all the others fleeing hardship, if you even qualify and the state does not decide for you.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately what you or I may believe in may just not be the reality we live in

**that aside, apologies for my knee-jerk reaction. It was not called for
 
There is a large population of people who view humans as prey. There are many names for them but it is easier to just call them monsters like in folk lore.

They have different needs from using humans as resources, enjoying making humans suffer, using humans as puppets, deciding who lives and dies.

Historically, when monsters took over an area, the prey would migrate away. This is how many countries, including America, were created; out of a need to escape the monsters.

The great reset is about creating a world where the prey has no escape.

FYI, one way to identify monsters are by their obsession with power and hierarchies.

There are plenty of monsters on this forum. Just look at their language use and notice those that use power as part of their language definition. For example, rather than the exact definition of racist as a person who uses race to judge people, the monsters limit racists to only those in power based on the monsters definition of power hierarchy. They extend that thinking throughout their language and use it as a tool to hide their true intentions.

Be careful of monsters, they are focussed on winning by any means necessary. They neither recognise nor follow any virtue. They function in the mindset where the weak must be dominated by the strong and might makes right.

There is no point in having an argument with them because they have no problem using any tool to win including lying, redefining words to corrupt the language, and when all else fails, deplatforming.
 
So for those who have been following this Great Reset, you should already know its connection to, and founding of, the concept by Klaus Schwab, the founder of the World Economic Forum who are also pushing for this Great Reset.

He released a new book, a few months ago, called COVID-19: The Great Reset, after originally floating the idea of a Great Reset as far back as 2014/2015.


There's guys that I watch on YouTube that are currently going through the book, seemingly topic by topic.

They are long. I recommend the watch.


This one is particularly interesting.


Bonus video. Not about the book directly.


 
sure the wealthy and powerful first! lol yeah right.
 
www.thedailybeast.com

The Real Fascist Threat Was Never Trump—It’s Corporate Power

We cannot hope to have a functional democracy when property and information are controlled by a small number of companies tightly allied with political power.
www.thedailybeast.com www.thedailybeast.com

The original fascist corporate state developed in Italy protected private property but also sought to use the private sector to support the political ends of the state. We are seeing that broad pattern now with the rise, particularly in the aftermath of George Floyd’s killing, of what is heralded as “stakeholder capitalism,” where private companies, rather than simply seeking out profit, genuflect to the left’s social agenda on issues of race, gender and green virtue.
Click to expand...
 
And so it starts.


Give any government an inch, and they'll take a mile.
How long before this is a thing.
 
This is all conditioning IMO. What they are proposing and the actual outcome will be two different things, but they will be able to I say we told you so.

Just remember none of it will be a black swan event, it will all have been planned, but it will more than likely look like a response to a seemingly random crisis to which The Great Reset plan they have concocted will be implemented.
 
‘The Great Reset’ is an idea put forward by the World Economic Forum to fundamentally restructure the global economy in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. David Ansara of the CRA speaks with author, Douglas Kruger, about the ideological underpinnings of the 'Davos agenda' and the risk it poses to property rights.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X