Posted by johnathonjosephs on (August 1, 2013, 18:57 GMT) - Featured comment
I don't understand how so many die hard cricket fans can be so clueless about the DRS system and the way it works. It is NOT Dharmasena's fault, but instead the fault of the ONFIELD umpire. The way a review works is in such a way that the Third Umpire CAN NOT say anything to the onfield umpire about the person "being out" or "being not out". They simply look at what technology gives and tells the facts. It is then up to the onfield umpire to reverse his dismissal based on what he hears. For example, in this scenario, Dharmasena probably told the umpire that "There is a noise, but no hot spot, can't confirm any thing on hot spot" and the onfield umpire then makes his decision. Only way the Third Umpire can get it wrong is if there is an ambiguous marking and he interprets it as something else. A lot of times, Third Umpires get unfairly blamed for stuff that may have not even been their fault. It is NOT the same as a review for no ball/run out which everyone seems to think it is