The Oscar Pistorius Murder Trial

Status
Not open for further replies.
I'm sure he will only entertain invitations to compete in countries that dont have an extradition treaty with SA...
 
It seems to me the learned judge has it right. The magistrate erred.

Each case is different, and it is right that the courts consider also the particularities of the case, the accused, etc.

We should be grateful the justice system still has regard for the unique circumstances in each case, rather than some universally applied algorithm that requires no prudence, judgment, and judicial discretion.

This is only the bail decision, folks. Unless there is a real risk of fleeing from justice, everyone has the right to their liberty until convicted in an open court. It's a basic postulate.

Some of the comments above make me fear for the future of our society. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?
 
Whether he would consider fleeing or not would in part depend on his current financial status. How would he fund an existence abroad?
 
Whether he would consider fleeing or not would in part depend on his current financial status. How would he fund an existence abroad?
Indeed.

Pistorius is well-known internationally. There is no way he could have a life abroad and continue his career were he to flee justice in SA. I think the judge rightly assessed that the probability of flight in this particular case was lower than the harm done to justice by his continued incarceration.
 
There could be jeering or protests every time that Pistorius tries to compete overseas so I doubt that he will be making too many appearances until he has been tried. The public will not easily forgive and forget this tragedy no matter the circumstances.
 
It seems to me the learned judge has it right. The magistrate erred.

Each case is different, and it is right that the courts consider also the particularities of the case, the accused, etc.

We should be grateful the justice system still has regard for the unique circumstances in each case, rather than some universally applied algorithm that requires no prudence, judgment, and judicial discretion.

This is only the bail decision, folks. Unless there is a real risk of fleeing from justice, everyone has the right to their liberty until convicted in an open court. It's a basic postulate.

Some of the comments above make me fear for the future of our society. What happened to innocent until proven guilty?

He killed her, there is no question about that. Somehow he expects his life to be 'normal'. It just highlights his character.
 
He killed her, there is no question about that. Somehow he expects his life to be 'normal'. It just highlights his character.
Huh? You're getting a bit ahead of the process here.
He does not deny killing her.
He claims it was accidental.
The State avers otherwise.
They will argue this in an open court, and a judge will decide.
Until then, he is presumed innocent. The term presumed has a very specific legal meaning in this context - it does not require that we or anyone think or assume that he's innocent (presume is not the same as assume) ... it essentially means that until he is proven to be guilty and found thus by an impartial tribunal, his (and your) normal rights cannot be vitiated, unless there is a real chance that the accused will flee from the justice that is to come.

Patience. Haste can do even greater injustice.
 
Huh? You're getting a bit ahead of the process here.
He does not deny killing her.
He claims it was accidental.

No he didn't, he claimed it wasn't premeditated. There was nothing accidental about it.

I will be amazed if he now ever actually stands trial.
 
Whether he would consider fleeing or not would in part depend on his current financial status. How would he fund an existence abroad?

You're forgetting about all the family businesses that he and his brother are involved in.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X