The Proteas - Our Team!

Interestingly, in all of AB's 19 ODI centuries, he has scored them at more than a run a ball. That is pretty good.
 
You didn't read above. Gulf in class between qualiy of bowlers they faced compared to what AB faces is a joke!

Uh, I see, so the criteria on which you judge has changed again. He's now made to look better than he is, not only because of where he bats but also because the bowlers are rubbish! Got it...

By the way, Lara, Sachin&Chanderpaul opened in ODIs, successfully too! As we all know Bradman aside, Ponting, Dravid&Sanga were 3 for the bulk of their careers - opening later in their careers in ODIs, also very successful. Very acceptable if you read what I said initially.

Lara? Not so much...

brian lara.jpg

Sachin and Chanderpaul quite a bit. Bradman? Well, no he didn't play any ODI in his day.

Ponting? Not so much...

ponting.jpg

Dravid? Not so much...

dravid.jpg

Kumar? Not so much....

kumar.jpg

AB? Actually he has so far scored more runs opening than Kumar, Ponting and Dravid...

ab.jpg
 

Attachments

  • steve waugh odi.jpg
    steve waugh odi.jpg
    27.1 KB · Views: 200
Four and below in ODIs you can't really be taken seriously when compared with the greats. Even more so these days when it free for all. That's the gist of my argument.

Okay, good, so based on this criteria let's see who else we can eliminate from the list of greats...

Steve Waugh...

View attachment 185900

Graeme Pollock (heard of him, he used to play a little, probably before your time)...

graeme pollock test.jpg

Allan Border...

allan border.jpg

Greg Chappell...

greg chappell odi.jpg

Viv Richards (Sir to you)...

sir viv richards odi.jpg

Imran Khan....

imran khan odi.jpg

Richard Hadlee (Sir to you)....

hadlee odi.jpg

I've got plenty of reputable quotes if you like. ;)

Still waiting for the links where you claim to have lauded AB's knock on another forum... tick tock... tick tock... You can keep your 'reputable quotes'.
 
Uh, I see, so the criteria on which you judge has changed again. He's now made to look better than he is, not only because of where he bats but also because the bowlers are rubbish! Got it...
The problem with you is that you don't read my posts. You want to disprove them but you're not keen on understanding them, merely gleaning through. Which is understandable if like most you don't think much of them or considering the length at times, perhaps naturally you have a general averseness to reading.

Whatever the case might be, as a result, you're fixed on opening yet I've been referring to the top 3 - which includes openers, hence my references to Ponting, Sanga, Steve Smith&Kohli batting there. All the more reason why I said AB over QdK(1/2) or Faf(3) - top 3 the bare minimum for him against the quality of bowlers doing the rounds these days.

Secondly, you're using number of runs as opposed to average. A lot of my posts have referred to averages instead of runs. If I were to use runs then countless Irish, Zimbabweans&Bangladeshis who've been playing ODIs for years now would be ahead of a lot of these batsmen. Poor average while scoring those runs is what led to AB being dropped, so why your graphs are picking that instead is beyond me.

I was very careful to say certain players opened at the "tailend" of their careers. That includes Ponting&Mahela. Obviously Mahela much more than Ponting but the bottomline is they didn't have poor averages or starts there like AB (or QdK&now RR), prior experience conceded.

The typical cricket article always dissects the attacks most batsmen face. Indians will say their batsmen were superior to the great Australian side of the 90s&00s because the AUS batsmen didn't have to face their own attack. Same argument with the great WI side before. SA have been consistent, at various times on par with ENG, AUS&IND after the great AUS side got weaker due to retirements. But they've had the better attack so those same three sides argue the same thing.

So I don't know why you feel the need write off what I'm saying when it's the norm.

When someone asks me, Bradman aside, and post late 80s, who's the greatest ever Test batsman that you've watched I say Ponting. I qualify that by saying no other batsman has been dominant over a number of cricket years as much as he has in terms of most hundreds in a calendar year, or most runs in a calendar year. When he was the best he was lone, without equal. They took turns to stand next to him over that period but none was his equal. At their best the others were on par with someone else, while with him there was no argument. I complete that list as 2.Lara, 3.Sanga, 4.Dravid, 5.Sachin, 6.Kallis.

Someone else's list would look different based on other reasons. I doubt anyone will beat him, but one of Root, Ballance, Williamson, Kohli&Smith etc may well go on to beat those stats over the next 10 years if the number of Tests they play per year continues like now, purely because the bowling is not getting better, not because they are superior batsmen. Opinions vary.;)
 
Whatever the case might be, as a result, you're fixed on opening yet I've been referring to the top 3 - which includes openers, hence my references to Ponting, Sanga, Steve Smith&Kohli batting there. All the more reason why I said AB over QdK(1/2) or Faf(3) - top 3 the bare minimum for him against the quality of bowlers doing the rounds these days.
Secondly, you're using number of runs as opposed to average.
AB currently has an average of 62 batting 3. How does that compare with Ponting, Steve, Kohli etc? (Seeing as we now not focusing on number of runs and just averages).

I was very careful to say certain players opened at the "tailend" of their careers. That includes Ponting&Mahela. Obviously Mahela much more than Ponting but the bottomline is they didn't have poor averages or starts there like AB (or QdK&now RR), prior experience conceded.
So you agree, opening at the beginning of your international career is a lot harder than doing it towards the 'tailend'? Or is your theory the more experienced you get the poorer you play?

The typical cricket article always dissects the attacks most batsmen face.

I complete that list as 2.Lara, 3.Sanga, 4.Dravid, 5.Sachin, 6.Kallis.

Seeing as Australia are generally the benchmark let's make a quick comparison of home and away ODI averages for some of the players on your all time greats list, against Australia....

Dravid
Home 28.31
Away 29.46

Sachin
Home 52.03
Away 30.83

Sangakkara
Home 47.82
Away 41.04

Lara
Home 48.0
Away 36.69

AB
Home 46.78
Away 66.0

Anyway, still waiting for your link where you've lauded AB's world breaking knock on a public platform... Truth is the only time you will comment is when he fails as that is the nature of your prejudice and bias. Same way you wait, hope and pray for the Boks to fail so too you wait, hope and pray for the Protea's to fail. Sad and pathetic. We live in this country together, we all in the same boat. Why do you wish the boat would sink? Are you even a citizen of this country? I find it hard to believe...
 
Last edited:
AB currently has an average of 62 batting 3.
Still guilty of neglecting to read my comments. Look back and you'll notice that I expressly said - AB may have struggled opening but he's done well at number 3, so why doesn't he continue there.
Seeing as Australia are generally the benchmark let's make a quick comparison of home and away ODI averages for some of the players on your all time greats list....
I specifically said in "Tests"
Truth is the only time you will comment is when he fails as that is the nature of your prejudice and bias. Same way you wait, hope and pray for the Boks to fail so too you wait, hope and pray for the Protea's to fail.
I have been commenting on AB for a long time. I say the same thing to Australians about Michael Clarke on Cricinfo, I say the same to the English fans about Root sliding down then suddenly looking like a world beater. You're personalising this to AB, Proteas and now Boks, which is the problem.

This is a typical case of me rightly arguing to a Liverpool or Chelsea fan why it was ok and not such a big loss for Gerrard and Lamps to leave their respective teams.

Preconceptions don't help. You're so hell bent on your inclinations that you're missing the comment, misreading a lot, and responding to absent questions.

Play the ball not the man. One guy above with that popular German striker's name simply said something along these lines "He likes AB batting at 4. Amla needs time to bat through accumulating in the process, Faf is settled&can't accelerate like, AB so he mus bat higher than him, so AB is fine there". I noted his point but reponded that if he's thinking that way then with rule changes, 10 overs batting powerplay AB can surely cash in more based on his reasoning. No fighting.

The other guy, maybe a bit dismissive but his reasoning was "AB has got nothing to prove". Simple! That really is the gist of my comments about AB really and he got it spot on. I say he's got something to prove and give reasons why, he says no and gives reasons why.

The one thing that you never want is when people discuss the greatest batsmen, the moment you hear something like "greatest middle order batsman", already you've been gently discounted from the equation of the true greats. I fear he'll belong to that category.
 
I specifically said in "Tests"

My bad, I thought this was the Official ICC 2015 CWC thread.

Dravid
Home 35.71
Away 41.64

Sachin
Home 56.91
Away 53.21

Sangakkara
Home 30.45
Away 60.33

Lara
Home 66.05
Away 41.97

AB
Home 51.05
Away 44.73

I have been commenting on AB for a long time.

Yes, we know! All negative! You simply can't bring yourself to say anything positive about him, can you?

You're so hell bent on your inclinations that you're missing the comment, misreading a lot, and responding to absent questions.

Quite the opposite! You the one going off on a tangent with soccer analogies etc etc etc I'm posting stats! Indisputable, hard, cold stats where you consistently change the criteria for your argument!

The one thing that you never want is when people discuss the greatest batsmen, the moment you hear something like "greatest middle order batsman", already you've been gently discounted from the equation of the true greats. I fear he'll belong to that category.

Yet look on any "greats" list and you'll find the names of Allan Border, Steve Waugh, Graeme Pollock, Garfield Sobers...
 
AB is already being touted as one of the best batsman in the history of the game, and nothing an outcast says is going to change that :p.
I'm always reluctant to start calling a guy a legend when he is theoretically barely half way through his international career but the fact that many already compare him with the greats is a testimony to his greatness. May he go from strength to strength! I sometimes watch and think, "has he already played his best cricket"?

This is quite an interesting article (but probably written by a ex-player who knows nothing :wtf:)...

http://indianexpress.com/article/sp...ost-valuable-cricketer-around-adam-gilchrist/

Australia’s three-time World Cup winner Adam Gilchrist has heaped praise on South Africa captain AB de Villiers, describing him as the “most valuable cricketer on the planet”.
“De Villiers is the most valuable cricketer on the planet. His versatility is extraordinary and he is amazing to watch,” said Gilchrist, who is sixth in the list of leading run-getters in the history of World Cup and with 52 dismissals is the most successful wicketkeeper.
“He’s so inventive … he can play a touch game or a power game. Then, he can also keep wickets. He’s also one of the best fielders in the world and recently has taken some wickets when he had a bowl. And he leads his team very well, so, I think he’s the most valuable cricketer around.”
 
I'm always reluctant to start calling a guy a legend when he is theoretically barely half way through his international career but the fact that many already compare him with the greats is a testimony to his greatness. May he go from strength to strength! I sometimes watch and think, "has he already played his best cricket"?

This is quite an interesting article (but probably written by a ex-player who knows nothing :wtf:)...

http://indianexpress.com/article/sp...ost-valuable-cricketer-around-adam-gilchrist/

He is clearly getting better and better at the moment. He should play for at least another 5 years if not more. He is very fit and hungry for the game so I would not be surprised if he plays for longer than what Kallis did.

Speaking of Kallis, he is doing pretty well in the Big Bash, would have been great still having him for the WC. What a great.
 
AB is already being touted as one of the best batsman in the history of the game...
Indeed, as will Warner, Kohli, Rahane, Smith, Kane Williamson, Root, Mathews, Monimul Haque (Bangladesh) etc!

AB hasn't even had a Test year as dominant as Warner, Smith, Amla or Root. Therein lies the problem. He'll feature in very few stats that one calls up. Total runs per year, highest averages, most centuries in a year etc.

Amla&Warner generally batted higher so we can understand. But when he's being eclipsed by Root, Kohli, Mathews&Smith in more or less the same position as him, plus having played the same number of games then that becomes a problem. They are not standing still you know, and they have youth on their side, so his best a year or two rom now may actually be 5th best.

He will play/bat for more years to come yes, but he'll be making up the numbers not standing out like Dravid, Kallis&Younis Khan later on in their careers.

Believe what you will.
 
AB hasn't even had a Test year as dominant as Warner, Smith, Amla or Root.

Best test average in a year - taken top 2 years for each player
Warner 2014 - 63.11 and 2011 48.75
Smith 2011 - 72.00 and 2014 81.86
Amla 2010 - 78.06 and 2012 - 70.93
Ab 2010 - 76.62 and 2013 77.75



He'll feature in very few stats that one calls up. Total runs per year, highest averages, most centuries in a year etc.

Quickest ODI 50 in history, quickest ODI 100 in history...
 
The debate on CricInfo regarding the team and Behardien in it. Thought I would move my thoughts here instead of the Windies thread.

Number 7 appears to be the debate and if Behardien should be in. Personally I do not think his international performances should keep in the starting 11. Domestic wise he is a good player.

Several others have been thrown into the hat for consideration including Albie, McLaren, Peterson and Wiese. (As MickeyD pointed out, Albie and McLaren are injured.)

Alternatively they could put *Dean Elgar in at 7 if the pitch would aid his bowling. His strength with the bat adds tremendous depth.

1. Quinton de Kock
2. Hashim Amla
3. Faf du Plessis
4. AB de Villiers
5. David Miller
6. JP Duminy
7. *
8. Vernon Philander
9. Dale Steyn
10. Morne Morkel
11. Imran Tahir
 
Then there is the idea of medium to long term grooming of promising players. But only the CWC is done and dusted. please.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X