elf_lord_ZC5
Honorary Master
Your SA is very selective ... , and abused by the ANC ...
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
CSA chair Lawson Naidoo's X feed is full of support for Palestine. Are we really meant to believe he is impartial in this?!
And why the double standards? How is the allowed to promote a political agenda but he removes the U19 captain for doing the same?
WtfConrad planned to axe Elgar before India series
Shukri Conrad told Dean Elgar that he was not going to be selected for the recent Test series against India.
According to Rapport newspaper, Elgar, who had no plans to retire from Test cricket, then struck a deal with Conrad that would allow him to play a final series in front of his home fans.
Elgar – the top run-scorer in SA’s 4-Day Domestic Series this season – scored 185 in the first Test against India in Centurion, leading the side to an innings win after taking over the captaincy from an injured Temba Bavuma on the first morning.
More: https://www.sacricketmag.com/conrad-planned-to-axe-elgar-before-india-series/
Manners makes good points all round.Neil Manthorp article on the teeger situation:
![]()
So the lesson that he's learnt is that offending anyone will get you cancelled? Using this same standard Malema should be in jail by now.Manners makes good points all round.
Given the bigger picture, CSA made a call that they viewed as the right one.
Was government involved, highly likely... but its understandable given the ICJ case going on. Whether right or wrong, the young man learnt a valuable lesson about being a public figure and how to conduct oneself in those situations.
A national captain is de facto a ministerial position. National teams and especially captains are seen as representative of their nations/countries.
edit: most members here that are employed will know that your employers most likely have a social media policy which restricts you from voicing personal opinions while seen in your capacity as an employee...
same story here
So the lesson that he's learnt is that offending anyone will get you cancelled? Using this same standard Malema should be in jail by now.
afriforum.co.za
Seems you are upset that someone piemped on him.
The lesson he learnt is that he should choose his words carefully, he is a public figure.
Julius has been taken to account by afriforum and other bodies for his comments. don't make as if he just gets to say what he wants and gets away with it
julius malema - AfriForum
afriforum.co.za
The point being that what these ppl say in public, (and yes if the news reports it correctly, its now in the public. same as JMs comments at EFF rallies) gets recorded for posterity. and will always be stuck to them...
I'm not upset about anything. I'm trying to understand the different rules for different people. I thought Apartheid was finished. This is an example of cancel culture at it's most evil. Why do you think there are good citizens who are prepared to fight this? Simply because it's wrong and must not be allowed to grow. Where does it end?Seems you are upset that someone piemped on him.
The lesson he learnt is that he should choose his words carefully, he is a public figure.
Julius has been taken to account by afriforum and other bodies for his comments. don't make as if he just gets to say what he wants and gets away with it
julius malema - AfriForum
afriforum.co.za
The point being that what these ppl say in public, (and yes if the news reports it correctly, its now in the public. same as JMs comments at EFF rallies) gets recorded for posterity. and will always be stuck to them...
i just refuted your claim that there are different rules for different people. With specific reference to JM.I'm not upset about anything. I'm trying to understand the different rules for different people. I thought Apartheid was finished. This is an example of cancel culture at it's most evil. Why do you think there are good citizens who are prepared to fight this? Simply because it's wrong and must not be allowed to grow. Where does it end?
All politics is dirty. As i stated, a national player/captain is de facto a ministerial position.He also learnt that dirty politics will always be dirty, no matter how much Surf or OMO you use.
You refuted nothing at all. If it was horses for courses Julius would be kicked out of Parliament. So what is the legal standing in the Teeger case?i just refuted your claim that there are different rules for different people. With specific reference to JM.
Any public statement made can be taken up within the legal system. I agree that not all of them are, but the rules are the same for everyone.
Are you claiming that if Dean Elgar or any other national player made the same statement that he would not be taken to task?
What is the "this" that you are referring to ?
All politics is dirty. As i stated, a national player/captain is de facto a ministerial position.
I've got nothing against the young man, he can say whatever he likes, but needs to be aware of whos listening and/or recording.In your opinion - so be it