Pitbull
Verboten
I agree, this has nothing to do with natural selection. If somebody walked up and shot you in the head, is that natural selection? Because your brain skull wasn't strong enough to withstand a bullet?
were*![]()
![]()
Damn it
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I agree, this has nothing to do with natural selection. If somebody walked up and shot you in the head, is that natural selection? Because your brain skull wasn't strong enough to withstand a bullet?
were*![]()
![]()
A New York Post front-page picture of a man about to be killed by an oncoming subway train provoked fury on Tuesday from readers left wondering why nobody, particularly the photographer, tried to pull the victim to safety — and why the tabloid published the image.
.The freelance photographer who took the pictures, R. Umar Abbasi, defended his actions in an interview. “I’m being unfairly beaten up in the press,” he said at his apartment in Greenwich Village on Tuesday, before leading a reporter to the 49th Street subway platform to re-enact what had happened.
Mr. Abbasi said he was wearing a 20-odd pound backpack of camera gear for an assignment, and was standing near the 47th Street entrance to the platform when he saw the man fall on the tracks. “Nobody helped,” he said. “People started running away.”
“I saw the lights in the distance,” signaling a subway’s approach, he said, so he started firing off flashes on the camera — 49 times in all, he said — as a means of warning the driver.
“I was not aiming to take a photograph of the man on the track,” he said, later adding that his arm was fully outstretched, the camera far from his face.
“If I had reached him in time, I would have pulled him up,” he said. At one point, the man said to have shoved Mr. Han came toward Mr. Abbasi, he said, so he backed up against a wall, still flashing his camera. He estimated the victim was on the tracks for 10 or 15 seconds before he was struck.
“The driver said he slowed down because he saw my flashes,” he said.
Mr. Abbasi said he brought police officers to The Post’s offices, where they examined the pictures for any images of the perpetrator, and he left the camera’s memory card with editors at The Post. He was not part of the decision to publish the pictures, he said.
“Every time I close my eyes, I see the image of death,” he said. “I don’t care about a photograph.”
Mr. Abbasi’s wife, Joan Sherman, said, “I understand people being heroes, but you also have to be realistic about what you’re capable of and your strength.”
The police commissioner, Raymond W. Kelly, when asked about the photographer’s actions, said: “I don’t know. I wasn’t there.”
“I don’t know how fast the train was coming in,” he added. News reports emerged saying Mr. Han had been drinking before the exchange, which occurred at about 12:30 p.m., after he argued with his wife. Mr. Han approached the man who pushed him, witnesses said, though it was unclear why. The man had been seen mumbling to himself. The encounter was a new wrinkle.
But waking up and stepping out of your house aren't stupid acts. Arguing and fighting with a hobo are stupid acts.Erm... no. Then all deaths can be put down to natural selection. By waking up in the morning and stepping out of your house you should know that danger to yourself increases by a bajillion %....
I don't see how someone shooting you is the same as fighting with a hobo that ends up shoving you to your doom.I agree, this has nothing to do with natural selection. If somebody walked up and shot you in the head, is that natural selection? Because your brain skull wasn't strong enough to withstand a bullet?
Maybe start my re-educationing by saying what you think natural selection is?If you think this was Natural selection then I would suggest you go get your school fees back
Seriously?
Please tell me you were joking?![]()
But waking up and stepping out of your house aren't stupid acts. Arguing and fighting with a hobo are stupid acts.
I don't see how someone shooting you is the same as fighting with a hobo that ends up shoving you to your doom.
Maybe start my re-educationing by saying what you think natural selection is?
Yes, I clearly need to be re-educated on how natural selection works. According to your theory any means of death appart from old age is a nomination for a Darwin award /facepalm
Except that that's not my theory at all. Again, please educate me as to what your understanding of natural selection is?
So... what is an example where natural selection is not at work?I'm arguing that this is natural selection at work. How did he come to be stuck in front of a rapidly approaching train?
What a retarded question... Google it, I can google it if I didn't know and post it. Please stop drawing stupid conclusions about people as you have no idea of what my understanding of evolution and natural selection is.
It's however clear to us all that you don't grasp the concept as yet. Now go google it and educate yourself a little better on the subject. No way does stupidity come into a scuffle with a hobo, we don't even know what caused the scuffle.
Ffs, why do I even bother? No use arguing with you on this subject
Personally, I voted yes. But in the immediacy of a situation like this, I'd like to think I would be able to assess the risks VS the outcome and help if it is possible, which is very hard to gauge from a snapshot.