Zoo tiger kills its handler
It is terrible for someone to die, it's always terrible, and it’s traumatic for the deceased's family and the Zoo and the people who witnessed the tragedy. But is it always necessary for a wild carnivore animal to be put down if people decide to invade their space? We all know that tigers, lions, leopards, etc eat meat, they eat other animals and they will eat human beings when given the chance. It's not the tiger's fault that the tiger was brought to the Zoo in the first place, and it's certainly not the tiger's fault that the man went inside the cage. So was it necessary for it to be put down, especially because that species of tiger has a population of a mere 120?
AUCKLAND - An experienced big-cat handler who once saved a fellow keeper from a tiger attack was mauled to death at a New Zealand zoo yesterday.
South African Dalu Mncube was killed by a white tiger while cleaning an enclosure with another keeper at the Zion Wildlife Gardens, near Whangarei in Northland, New Zealand.
The zoo featured Craig Busch on the hit TV show The Lion Man.
Staff members rushed to Mncube's aid, but the male tiger would not let go, and Mncube died at the scene from "tearing" injuries to his head, torso and lower leg.
The tiger is believed to be Abu, a tiger that attacked keeper Demetri Price in February, until Mncube forced the animal to let go.
The white tiger, one of only 120 in the world, was put down yesterday, and the park was closed to the public.
The police and Department of Labour are investigating the matter.
Eight tourists who saw the attack, as well as distressed park workers, received counselling.
At a press conference, Northland police Inspector Paul Dimery said the attack was being treated as a criminal investigation, but there was nothing to suggest the death was suspicious.
On the Zion website, Mncube was described as second-in-charge to Busch, who was fired from the park by his mother, Patricia Busch, the zoo's head, last year.
Mncube leaves his partner, Sharon Arnott, and one-year-old daughter, Starskea. - New Zealand Herald
It is terrible for someone to die, it's always terrible, and it’s traumatic for the deceased's family and the Zoo and the people who witnessed the tragedy. But is it always necessary for a wild carnivore animal to be put down if people decide to invade their space? We all know that tigers, lions, leopards, etc eat meat, they eat other animals and they will eat human beings when given the chance. It's not the tiger's fault that the tiger was brought to the Zoo in the first place, and it's certainly not the tiger's fault that the man went inside the cage. So was it necessary for it to be put down, especially because that species of tiger has a population of a mere 120?