@Crabby, agreed. Its fairly sick for someone (allegedly) not inside a country, to be telling people who are in that country, locked up behind high walls and facing the possibility of extreme violence 24/7 - to 'stay where they are' and continue trying to tell those people how bad leaving might be, and how 'awful' overseas is.
I'm curious.
Please define "not inside a country", referring to the folllowing cases:
Person A flies for work to a non-SA country for 1 day.
Person B flies for work to a non-SA country for 1 week.
Person C flies for work to a non-SA country for 1 month.
Person D flies for work to a non-SA country for 6 months.
Person E flies for work to a non-SA country for 1 year.
Or shall we rather measure it like this:
Person A lives and works in a non-SA country 5% of one year.
Person B lives and works in a non-SA country 10% of one year.
Person C lives and works in a non-SA country 25% of one year.
Person D lives and works in a non-SA country 50% of one year.
Person E lives and works in a non-SA country 100% of one year.
While in the non-SA country, said Person raises comments and suggestions about SA, emmigration, etc.
So, without necessarily being aware of my particular case, which one of the above shall serve to officially disquality any Person A~E from raising comments about SA, notwithstanding the extra experience and perspective the person actually gains by travelling and living around and comparing it to living in SA?
Please provide official proof of definition / measurements as provided by state or this forum. Thanks.