The objection to child labour spurned many a Marxist/Socialist ... even Marx himself.Why can't I severely beat my child and have him start working at the age of 6 like the good old days.
Silly Libs.
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
The objection to child labour spurned many a Marxist/Socialist ... even Marx himself.Why can't I severely beat my child and have him start working at the age of 6 like the good old days.
Silly Libs.
Would your mind change if the abuse and harassment of those of Asian decent outside of China was still happening now and had never stopped?You do realise before trump started hammering this china virus thing the whole world knew where the virus came from? The isolated xenophobia cases happened in those times.
Says the guy who supports Election fraud conspiracies. I see you are getting closer and closer to coming out and admitting it.Says the guy who says PVeritas is fake because they expose things you don't like.
If they tell a lie enough, it becomes the truth.I'm not even bothering anymore. @Cray was cool, but now not so much.
Oh well.
Remember when Marx hated blacks and Mexicans.The objection to child labour spurned many a Marxist/Socialist ... even Marx himself.
The real threat is them buying up America (and other) businesses. Especially food, food processing, oil.
Wait until people realise that Africa is becoming China's China.a little off-topic - but that's because the topic keeps going off into insanity - this, below, is a really good analysis, especially for a normal media outlet, of China's plays, objectives, and drivers.
![]()
China in Africa is more than a land grab
Beijing is after political influence, and its coronavirus aid will count for much.www.japantimes.co.jp
"Beijing can still take advantage and obtain what matters to China: political allies in the United Nations, where Africa accounts for more than a quarter of member states, and clout that in turn influences its relations with great powers. Efforts have already paid off relative to far more expensive gambits, like its rapprochement with Pakistan. Given the pandemic, collapsing oil, a disinterested U.S. and a distracted Europe, it can do so more cheaply than ever.
To be clear, mineral riches and mercantile interests do matter. China’s companies are eyeing a young, growing population of 1.3 billion consumers. Shenzhen Transsion Holdings Co., a mobile-phone maker focused on Africa, priced its 2019 initial public offering in Shanghai at a price-earnings valuation twice that of Apple Inc. Telecom equipment maker Huawei Technologies Co. does brisk business there.
Even so, Africa represents less than 5 percent of Beijing’s $4 trillion of annual global trade. The real great game is about securing a Chinese candidate at the head of the Food and Agriculture Organization; getting a friendly one at the World Health Organization; and landing the country’s first overseas military base. Considering more countries attended President Xi Jinping’s 2018 African summit than the U.N. General Assembly held a few weeks later, there’s plenty to build on."
Wait until people realise that Africa is becoming China's China.
It was known as the Wuhan virus long before it ever became the coronavirus. When CNN reported it as the Wuhan virus it was not xenophobic. Since trump called it the Wuhan virus and China virus it suddenly became taboo.
Proof:
Anyway, who wouldn't know which disease is being referred to when it's called the China virus?
arstechnica.com
Someone who wasn't blocked replied, so I peeked behind the curtain. I have learnt my lesson.If they are on your ignore list, how did you see their valid points?
Wait until people realise that Africa is becoming China's China.
China - in their mind - only recently came out of a self-imposed mass hypnosis/dark ages that was indescribably horrific and still leaves them with cultural PTSD. they've taken a long, slow, and hyper-cautious route towards building economic power, and with that seeming to have come, they've sought influence. when you scan the world, there aren't that many regions that they could build power in. most of the key global power bases were relatively settled by the 20th-century realpolitik clashes (think the oil regions, the large mineral regions, etc.) they're not "stable", but they're in these kinds of violent stable equilibria and they're not as easy for a new power to enter and disrupt.
Africa, on the other hand, was relatively open, and a big part of the Chinese initial interest was barely political and pretty basic. it was about locking up arable land and agribusiness, because despite being an enormous landmass, they've got relative poor arable land and an exponentially growing population. so they bought up land for a long time - Mozambiqe's agribusiness is something like 70% Chinese controlled - and this predictably caused a backlash. then they shifted approach to things like BRICS and ramped up aid and started debt relief and the like, positioning China as the spokesman for the developing world.
Your post in your own words pushing Davids theories and connecting it to a case of fraud.
I have no idea how that is in any way relevant to this thread, or the quote I shared.
So, nothing then. Thought so.Your post in your own words pushing Davids theories and connecting it to a case of fraud.
You made the connection, you boosted his propaganda.
You lay with him. Now you have his fleas on you.
I have no idea how that is in any way relevant to this thread, or the quote I shared.
It seems like you're so used to discrediting the source of anything you don't like, that you're attempting to discredit the source of "Will someone please hide the pens from Joe at the White House?"...![]()
You gotta admit though, they're doing a good job convincing Africans they're doing good work.i posted this way back when in a different thread. (was about covid conspiracies, but the comment holds.)
pragmatically, they need agribusiness extensions because they have a population problem. politically, they need a voting bloc. a lot of what they do is easy to understand in those terms.
The left has absolutely no grounds to call out hypocrisy for the next 200 years. There's no point in anyone else pointing out the left's never ending hypocrisy, because none of you care. If being hypocrisy helps the left, you'll be hypocritical. If lying helps the left, you'll lie.It's called hypocrisy - a woman that can't stick to a speed limit, buckle her kids into their chairs, wear a seatbelt, change their license plates in time and not kill someone with her vehicle on multiple incidents years apart should not be lecturing a man on pens
The left has absolutely no grounds to call out hypocrisy for the next 200 years. There's no point in anyone else pointing out the left's never ending hypocrisy, because none of you care. If being hypocrisy helps the left, you'll be hypocritical. If lying helps the left, you'll lie.