Ubuntu previews Jaunty

and?

Based on OOo 1.x? Thanks, but I'll stick with OpenOffice.org - 3.0RC1 is out, I think.

Oh and MAC OS is based on old BSD code.....

Don't judge things before you tried them, I was mentioning it for companies that normally go for support rather than just something thats just free.
 
KDE ftw!! :D

Xfce, is the best desktop environment in my humble opinion, for the following reason:

Packed with the true freedom of GTK+. Sexy in its' own right and most importantly more, for less.

Nothing, can beat that(yet).

ps. I'm not picking on you. It is pure coincidence that I'm replying on your posts :P
 
Played around with Xfce and found it to be lean and mean - a good choice for PC's which doesn't have enough RAM or struggles to run KDE.
 
Oh and MAC OS is based on old BSD code.....

Don't judge things before you tried them, I was mentioning it for companies that normally go for support rather than just something thats just free.
Point taken. And I have tried it.
Xfce, is the best desktop environment in my humble opinion, for the following reason:

Packed with the true freedom of GTK+. Sexy in its' own right and most importantly more, for less.

Nothing, can beat that(yet).

ps. I'm not picking on you. It is pure coincidence that I'm replying on your posts :P
Bully! :p

Funny that - I tried XFCE, and still came back to KDE. I love that it is an integrated solution - I can run all KDE-based apps on my 256MB RAM laptop with no hassles. The trick is to keep away from non-KDE apps.
 
M$ is going to drown in their own money..... muhahaha.... all thanks to the Linux revolution.
 
Hey

Does anyone know how I can contact Ubunutu South Africa?

Thanks
 
opensuse + kde and i'm in love i dont know what it is may be its the brown i just dont like ubuntu i could easily use fedora than ubuntu
 
Last edited:
I'm just tired of people criticizing a product because they have this or that problem with a operating system but at the end of the day it's the hardware vendor that one needs to blame.

I agree somewhat. They 1st need to give you a reason to switch.... but they also need to make it possible. Else what's the point?

I have seen a big shift in the open source community in the last few years. People are finally "getting" what's needed on the desktop. To me the priority for a desktop environment has always been to be unobtrusive. This basically means

1) It must "just work". I don't want to spend hours messing with KDE settings just to hear some audio
2) The desktop must be quick and it must "feel" responsive (i.e. If I click, it must respond immediately, every time).
3) The focus must be on the applications. It must not take up to much screen real estate.
4) Last, but not least, it must look nice.

3 of those 4 points are just not achievable without good hardware support.

The hardware support in Macs has always been the major reason their desktop is king. They get 1) right and mostly get 2) right. They were even one of the 1st to use the 3d card to assist with 4).

Its unfortunate, but without hardware support... Gnome/KDE/Whatever will always be the poor cousin.

Cheers
Paul
 
You tried NetworkManager 0.7 SVN ?

The 3G/HSDPA support is painless and I understand that the plan is to have all the bugs with with WPA ironed out by the time Intrepid is released.

Edit: Its the SVN version i'm using... not the beta. May be a little too bleeding edge for some ;)
Repository url please
Code:
svn co ...
 
1) It must "just work". I don't want to spend hours messing with KDE settings just to hear some audio
2) The desktop must be quick and it must "feel" responsive (i.e. If I click, it must respond immediately, every time).
3) The focus must be on the applications. It must not take up to much screen real estate.
4) Last, but not least, it must look nice.

The hardware support in Macs has always been the major reason their desktop is king. They get 1) right and mostly get 2) right. They were even one of the 1st to use the 3d card to assist with 4).

Its unfortunate, but without hardware support... Gnome/KDE/Whatever will always be the poor cousin.

Cheers
Paul

I agree on all 4 points and also about why Apples' are so nice to use(If you have the money). But that is also where Ubuntu is heading, with Dell shipping it on their computers.

Because if a vendor ships a operating on their hardware I assume the operating system was tested with the hardware and that any glitches or bugs specific to the hardware will be sorted out.

Regards,
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X