Ultimatum 'despicable, unacceptable' - Another young retards league

nivek

Honorary Master
Joined
Mar 25, 2005
Messages
10,616
Reaction score
2,829
http://www.news24.com/News24/South_Africa/Politics/0,,2-7-12_2344174,00.html


Johannesburg - Demanding an apology from African National Congress Youth League (ANCYL) leader Julius Malema for his "kill for Zuma" statement was "despicable", the Young Communist League (YCL) said on Friday.

The youth wing of the South African Communist Party (SACP) said it noted "with disgust the ultimatum given to... Malema by the South African Human Rights Commission (SAHRC)".

"As the YCL we understand and accept the context within which the statement was made by the ANCYL president and see no need for him to apologise," Ngobese said.
 
errhhmmm maybe someone should tell them that communism actually failed everywhere so far in the world...

Communism didn't fail for the LEADERS. That's the whole idea of Communism. Its to set up a totalitarian state, based on terror and suppression of ideas and basic freedoms, and have a small elite rule - the ruling elite has privileges and luxuries beyond the scope of any democratically elected rulers anywhere.
Eg Cuba, North Korea, Kampuchea, Vietnam, China, Soviet Union, etc.

While communism is a fail for >80% of the population, for the remaining 10%
its paradise, these are usually people who only owe their position and status to ruthless loyalty towards the party. Oh and the other 10%, well Communists
kill off at least 10% of the population when they take power, although in
some places - Soviet Union, Cambodia etc - that figure went up to 20-30%.

So pls don't fall under the illusion that COMMUNISM has failed. Its only failed in the way that in some places (Eastern Europe) the COMMUNISTS were not able to hold on to power but it was successful overall after all how else would low scumbags like
Lenin, Pol Pot and Stalin ever have the hope to rise to such glory and riches? Maybe the local gang.

Communists are still in power in name in many countries and by having changed their names in places like Russia.
 
Last edited:
Communism didn't fail for the LEADERS. That's the whole idea of Communism. Its to set up a totalitarian state, based on terror and suppression of ideas and basic freedoms, and have a small elite rule - the ruling elite has privileges and luxuries beyond the scope of any democratically elected rulers anywhere.
Eg Cuba, North Korea, Kampuchea, Vietnam, China, Soviet Union, etc.

While communism is a fail for >80% of the population, for the remaining 10%
its paradise, these are usually people who only owe their position and status to ruthless loyalty towards the party. Oh and the other 10%, well Communists
kill off at least 10% of the population when they take power, although in
some places - Soviet Union, Cambodia etc - that figure went up to 20-30%.

So pls don't fall under the illusion that COMMUNISM has failed. Its only failed in the way that in some places (Eastern Europe) the COMMUNISTS were not able to hold on to power but it was successful overall after all how else would low scumbags like
Lenin, Pol Pot and Stalin ever have the hope to rise to such glory and riches? Maybe the local gang.

Communists are still in power in name in many countries and by having changed their names in places like Russia.

Very true, its a big mistake to assume that their stated objectives are their real objectives. The YCL are still a bunch of retards though.
 
Why doesnt someone send an email to these confused indivuals, hey, they might even reply.
 
yep, gone are the days when war and killing for your country and king was for honor and the greater good of humanity (e.g. Like removing Hitler from power)..... now the threat of killing and war is to do what exactly against whom exactly??????
 
Why doesnt someone send an email to these confused indivuals, hey, they might even reply.

You think they know how to work a computer?
Even something simple as finding the power on switch, will be a FAIL.
 
Its to set up a totalitarian state, based on terror and suppression of ideas and basic freedoms, and have a small elite rule - the ruling elite has privileges and luxuries beyond the scope of any democratically elected rulers anywhere.

Weird. For a moment there it sounded like you were describing Apartheid :D
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X