US Election 2020 - The Result

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

buka001

Honorary Master
Joined
Oct 16, 2009
Messages
16,981
SoldierMan said:
How do YOU know they are false???

When did you, and the likes of you, decide what is constitutional or the facts in this instance?!

Do you see what you have done, you have set yourself as judge, jury and dictator. You don't know squat here in little ol' SA, but yet you say without hesitation what the outcome SHOULD BE. What a joke.

You point fingers at Trump yet you have set yourself up as the ultimate authority, to heck with the courts Trump doesn't have the right to ask the courts to check on the validity in certain states. The courts aren't for him, they're for other people, just not him. You have shown your colours and they are as red as the Chinese communist flag.
Click to expand...

36 court cases have told me they are false.

The judges from those cases told me.

Thus far the cases have been so spurious, the judges have dismissed them on merit, because of the abject lack of validity.

If you had allegations of fraud, why wait? Why not lead with this? 20 days have passed without 1 page of evidence.
 
S

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
buka001 said:
36 court cases have told me they are false.

The judges from those cases told me.

Thus far the cases have been so spurious, the judges have dismissed them on merit, because of the abject lack of validity.

If you had allegations of fraud, why wait? Why not lead with this? 20 days have passed without 1 page of evidence.
Click to expand...

So the courts are doing their job, surprise. So stop acting like you are in charge and get to dictate who gets to take what to court.
 
S

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
tetrasect said:
So they filed and lost 35 lawsuits with false accusations so far and you believe what? That they kept the "real" evidence for like lawsuit nr. 78 or something? :ROFL: :ROFL: :ROFL:
Click to expand...

So you, almighty one, have the inside knowledge of what the rest of the lawsuits contain? If not, suggest you shut it and wait for the outcome.
 
S

SoldierMan

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 3, 2019
Messages
9,416
scudsucker said:
Ah, the great "google my idiotic claim and try to find evidence for something ridiculous" gambit.

Soldier Boy, the onus is upon you to prove your claim, or, you are welcome to admit that you are talking nonsense. Your choice, "dad".
Click to expand...

Listen sonny, google it or don't I don't care much either way.
 
AlmightyBender

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
SoldierMan said:
LOL and we on the right get told not to equate the extreme left who want to cut off 8 year old's dcks because they dress in girls cloths, with the more moderate left. So is it true greg, are the communist socialist nutjobs actually the same as ordinary liberals. I mean if we are to follow your logic of course :unsure:
Click to expand...
DramaLlama detected. Administering copium.
 
L

lexity

Executive Member
Joined
Jan 31, 2020
Messages
7,093
greg0205 said:
Yup. I'd move.

Read SB's answer and the 2A means nothing to me... What is important to me 'tho is healthcare, and if you look at the majority of red states, they haven't expanded at all.

I'd want to be somewhere where they put up a fight against 'another Trump, or worse'.

Blue state with a blue state house, blue Governor and a blue AG thank you very much.

No Whataburgers in blue states, so it would have to be one with a Five Guys.
Click to expand...
So you'd be okay with blue states becoming permanently blue, legally. And I'm assuming you would similarly have no beef with red states becoming permanently red. Where the purple states could remain purple, permanently, too.

You could in that case live under blue policies 100% of the time, without forcing the same on any reds. No red could claim you were forcing them to be blue. Like Soldierman, for instance said he could live in a blue state as long as the 2nd amendment remained untouched (or he could move out if he changed his mind, or because the 2A was removed at some point).

This is recipe for 100% peaceful co-existence, instead of what everyone has now.... only 50% of the time living under your preferred policies.

You could still trade, visit, travel.... do what ever as long as you accept responsibility for ever breaking the law in any state.

p.s. Who is SB?
 
TysonRoux

TysonRoux

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
11,456

Only MyBB Trumptards and the Borat star actor Rudy thinks the impeached Orange Snollygoster has a chance at overturning the elections.​

​

Trump turned to Giuliani after his top attorneys refused to get involved in his post-election legal battle​

www.rawstory.com

Trump turned to Giuliani after his top attorneys refused to get involved in his post-election legal battle: report

A new report from ABC News documents how President Donald Trump decided to put Rudy Giuliani in charge of his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election after his own top lawyers told him he was unlikely to prevail.According to ABC News' sources, White House Counsel Pat...
www.rawstory.com www.rawstory.com

Screen-Shot-2020-01-24-at-8.11.49-AM.png


A new report from ABC News documents how President Donald Trump decided to put Rudy Giuliani in charge of his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election after his own top lawyers told him he was unlikely to prevail.

According to ABC News’ sources, White House Counsel Pat Cipollone, as well as longtime attorney Jay Sekulow, both gave Trump pessimistic assessments of his chances of prevailing in court with lawsuits to throw out hundreds of thousands of votes in Michigan and Pennsylvania.

“What we said was, it would be a Herculean effort and every domino would have to line up and fall in place,” one source tells ABC News. “Not a likely result.”
 
tetrasect

tetrasect

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2009
Messages
9,105
SoldierMan said:
So you, almighty one, have the inside knowledge of what the rest of the lawsuits contain? If not, suggest you shut it and wait for the outcome.
Click to expand...

Actually yes, I do. Anyone can view the active lawsuits. https://www.democracydocket.com/case_type/active-cases/

We don't need to wait for a judgement to see that not one of these cases is claiming that there was fraud.

All these cases are trying to do is steal votes from people on BS grounds like whose name was first on the ballot list.

So unless you have some actual proof of even a single fraud case being filed in court I suggest you shut it and wait for your miracles in silence.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
lexity said:
So you'd be okay with blue states becoming permanently blue, legally. And I'm assuming you would similarly have no beef with red states becoming permanently red. Where the purple states could remain purple, permanently, too.

You could in that case live under blue policies 100% of the time, without forcing the same on any reds. No red could claim you were forcing them to be blue. Like Soldierman, for instance said he could live in a blue state as long as the 2nd amendment remained untouched (or he could move out if he changed his mind, or because the 2A was removed at some point).

This is recipe for 100% peaceful co-existence, instead of what everyone has now.... only 50% of the time living under your preferred policies.

You could still trade, visit, travel.... do what ever as long as you accept responsibility for ever breaking the law in any state.

p.s. Who is SB?
Click to expand...
You're talking about Europe... The US is a federal republic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top