US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
*gasp* There was job creation at end of a recession that cost millions of jobs...

A recession that could have dragged out for years, but basically recovered its footing after the Recovery Act

#thanksobama you got the US unemployment almost back to where is was pre-recession :rolleyes:

XOD5PVXEBVCI3DQ3SZEQUB56B4.jpg


Obama’s Last Three Years Of Job Growth All Beat Trump’s Best Year

52Q2WLGDLVG5RF3ELS7YGBNCKY.jpg


So where's that Trump miracle again?
 
He's 100% correct. Trump's economy is clearly benefiting from the upward streak that began under Obama. Like it or not, Obama was the best thing that could have happened to the US economy after GW Bush eviscerated it for 8 years, culminating in a global market crash.
But hold on, wasn't the economy going to collapse if Trump became president?

Obama is a damn oracle messiah!

Not only are we to thank him for the US economy until the year 2155, but he is also still secretly running the economy even though Trump is trying his best to destroy it!
 
A recession that could have dragged out for years, but basically recovered its footing after the Recovery Act



XOD5PVXEBVCI3DQ3SZEQUB56B4.jpg
:ROFL:You may want to match that up with some population numbers;)

I never said anything about 'trump miracle', but if you want to go there, unemployment was lower pre recession under bush than it was when obama left office, ie, obama didn't even get back all the jobs lost, got close, over 8 years still couldn't get there, its the slowest recovery ever recorded... under trump its now the lowest in 20 years
But hey, keep to your last 3 years graphs the echo chamber keep repeating, I'm sure someone will buy it:giggle:
 
Temujin said:
:ROFL:You may want to match that up with some population numbers;)

Oh did the population suddenly decrease under GW Bush? That would explain a lot. The Thanos effect.

But hold on, wasn't the economy going to collapse if Trump became president?

Obama is a damn oracle messiah!

Not only are we to thank him for the US economy until the year 2155, but he is also still secretly running the economy even though Trump is trying his best to destroy it!

He isn't secretly running anything. But let's be honest Trump hasn't done anything for the economy. My prediction with Trump was that he would firstly explode the deficit - which proved to be true - secondly cut taxes to goose the economy and reward his donors - which also proved to be true - but eventually his economy would enter into a slump and never quite recover. He simply isn't competent enough or long-term focused enough to hold the boat steady if and when a crisis happens.
 
Oh did the population suddenly decrease under GW Bush? That would explain a lot. The Thanos effect.
:rolleyes: You use a graph with number employed since 70s to show what a saint your obama is... which is meaningless... if you want to use that, then show population too... numbers will always go up cos population goes up. You need to use % of population, as shown in rest of my post, unemployment was lower under bush than it was after obama left #thanksobama ;)
 
Last edited:
:ROFL:You may want to match that up with some population numbers;)


I never said anything about 'trump miracle', but if you want to go there, unemployment was lower pre recession under bush than it was when obama left office, ie, obama didn't even get back all the jobs lost, got close, over 8 years still couldn't get there, its the slowest recovery ever recorded... under trump its now the lowest in 20 years
But hey, keep to your last 3 years graphs the echo chamber keep repeating, I'm sure someone will buy it:giggle:
It's not Obama or Trunp.
Its Reagan's trickle down economic policy.
 
It's not Obama or Trunp.
Its Reagan's trickle down economic policy.
^^Correct
Edit: Actually, looking at the cerebus employment by numbers graph, clearly it was W.Bush who started the trend #thanksbush

*awaits w.bush 'on this day in '77 I signed' tweet*
 
:rolleyes: You use a graph with number employed since 70s to show what a saint your obama is... which is meaningless... if you want to use that, then show population too... numbers will always go up cos population goes up. You need to use % of population, as shown in rest of my post, unemployment was lower under bush than it was after obama left #thanksobama ;)

Lol I don't think Obama is a saint. Point is economies can go up or down cyclically, but what's clear from all economic evidence is that Obama's intervention in 2008 made a big difference in rescuing the US economy from a potentially long-term recession. I remember during that time economists were forecasting a decade of stagnation because of the impact of the crash. Economies don't just go up due to population; they can stagnate and recede as well.
 
Lol I don't think Obama is a saint. Point is economies can go up or down cyclically, but what's clear from all economic evidence is that Obama's intervention in 2008 made a big difference in rescuing the US economy from a potentially long-term recession. I remember during that time economists were forecasting a decade of stagnation because of the impact of the crash. Economies don't just go up due to population; they can stagnate and recede as well.
Correct, and yet you still chose to post a job by numbers graph to show 'but look under obama 145mil people were employed vs 1977 with only 80mil employed', which you know its bs to show it like that... it requires population to compare to, I never said economies go up cos population goes up, the graph you chose to post requires you to compare it to population to get the % employed/unemployed, as numbers will always be higher 50years down the line due to population growth, its why we use %, and not the physical number... but again, you know it, but you chose to post it anyway as its better for you that way as showing that unemployed was actually down kinda pokes a hole in your 'obama saved the world' argument...
 
Correct, and yet you still chose to post a job by numbers graph to show 'but look under obama 145mil people were employed vs 1977 with only 80mil employed', which you know its bs to show it like that... it requires population to compare to, I never said economies go up cos population goes up, the graph you chose to post requires you to compare it to population to get the % employed/unemployed, as numbers will always be higher 50years down the line due to population growth, its why we use %, and not the physical number... but again, you know it, but you chose to post it anyway as its better for you that way as showing that unemployed was actually down kinda pokes a hole in your 'obama saved the world' argument...

Man learn how to write proper sentences.
 
But hold on, wasn't the economy going to collapse if Trump became president?

Obama is a damn oracle messiah!

Not only are we to thank him for the US economy until the year 2155, but he is also still secretly running the economy even though Trump is trying his best to destroy it!

Basically like this dude says, same people who were crying 3 years ago that trump will cause the next great depression are the same now arguing obama is responsible, its just tds brain rot :giggle:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X