US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
The 5 had later evidence that exonerated them. Michael Flynn does not. As I said:
There hasn't been any new evidence that I'm aware of to exonerate him

The Trumpets aren't sending their best. Just a lazy effort from Temujin. Not even really trying.
 

OrbitalDawn

Ulysses Everett McGill
Joined
Aug 26, 2011
Messages
47,031
Fox News gives Trump the softest lay-up question about Mother's Day and... he starts going on about fighter jets?

EXqBWjvX0AES0wJ
 

TysonRoux

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 7, 2012
Messages
11,456
Trumptards out shopping.


200510-armed-protester-axc-702p_b0a1bee37f18bf5b97a20ace268683f1.fit-2000w.jpg


Travis Long, a photojournalist with The News & Observer, said he shot the photos inside a Subway on Fayetteville Street in downtown Raleigh.

One photo shows a protester carrying what appears to be an AT4 rocket launcher and two pistols in holsters on his waist. Another shows a protester holding a large weapon over his shoulder as he appears to take a selfie. Only two of the protesters who appear in the photos are wearing masks.

 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
Trumptards out shopping.


200510-armed-protester-axc-702p_b0a1bee37f18bf5b97a20ace268683f1.fit-2000w.jpg


Travis Long, a photojournalist with The News & Observer, said he shot the photos inside a Subway on Fayetteville Street in downtown Raleigh.

One photo shows a protester carrying what appears to be an AT4 rocket launcher and two pistols in holsters on his waist. Another shows a protester holding a large weapon over his shoulder as he appears to take a selfie. Only two of the protesters who appear in the photos are wearing masks.

That's awesome. Lol.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
That's awesome. Lol.

It's cosplay.

I believe you call them 'betas', cosplaying to intimidate regular folk.

I call them clowns.

EXtbaYiXkAU1wTB


It's supposed to be a .50 cal Browning.

My Casspir in Namibia had a twin-mount with one those and a .30 cal alongside... Some preferred two .30 cals 'cos their rate of fire was higher, and some preferred two big guns, 'cos... heavy round.

One team-leader even welded a 60mm patrol mortar to his rig along with the two guns, but there was a reason for the gun (and mortar) in Namibia in the 80s.

Now, look closer at the pic...

Bobo here's gun is wood and I suspect the handle is a horse shoe.

Cosplay to intimidate regular folk.

At Subway...

Bobo is a clown. Don't be like Bobo.
 

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
It's cosplay.

I believe you call them 'betas', cosplaying to intimidate regular folk.

I call them clowns.

EXtbaYiXkAU1wTB


It's supposed to be a .50 cal Browning.

My Casspir in Namibia had a twin-mount with one those and a .30 cal alongside... Some preferred two .30 cals 'cos their rate of fire was higher, and some preferred two big guns, 'cos... heavy round.

One team-leader even welded a 60mm patrol mortar to his rig along with the two guns, but there was a reason for the gun (and mortar) in Namibia in the 80s.

Now, look closer at the pic...

Bobo here's gun is wood and I suspect the handle is a horse shoe.

Cosplay to intimidate regular folk.

At Subway...

Bobo is a clown. Don't be like Bobo.

Ja, whatever. Im not someone that would play dressup "cosplay" myself. But credit where it's due. It's awesome if someone gets it right.

You just sound jealous because you are stuck in the house.
 

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Ja, whatever. Im not someone that would play dressup "cosplay" myself. But credit where it's due. It's awesome if someone gets it right.

You just sound jealous because you are stuck in the house.

Getting it right? Sure.

The actual gun weighs nearly 40kgs and that's *exactly* how you carry it around.

Bobo is spot-on.

/s
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
‘I fired ten shots at my intended victim, but every round missed so how can I be guilty of a crime’ argues the arbiter of all things moral in the Trump threads.

Oh, and:


Your link supports what I am saying, greg. Thanks for that.

Can you please identify how the supposed lie is material to any legitimate FBI investigation?

While I wait for you to scramble to answer this question with some sort of legal basis (while you are at it, maybe you can show ANY precedent for an indictment based on the Logan Act in support of your argument), here is a song for you which I know you can relate to.


18 U.S. Code § 1001.Statements or entries generally
prev | next
(a)Except as otherwise provided in this section, whoever, in any matter within the jurisdiction of the executive, legislative, or judicial branch of the Government of the United States, knowingly and willfully—
(1)
falsifies, conceals, or covers up by any trick, scheme, or device a material fact;
(2)
makes any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or representation; or
(3)
makes or uses any false writing or document knowing the same to contain any materially false, fictitious, or fraudulent statement or entry;
shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 5 years or, if the offense involves international or domestic terrorism (as defined in section 2331), imprisoned not more than 8 years, or both. If the matter relates to an offense under chapter 109A, 109B, 110, or 117, or section 1591, then the term of imprisonment imposed under this section shall be not more than 8 years.
(b)
Subsection (a) does not apply to a party to a judicial proceeding, or that party’s counsel, for statements, representations, writings or documents submitted by such party or counsel to a judge or magistrate in that proceeding.
(c)With respect to any matter within the jurisdiction of the legislative branch, subsection (a) shall apply only to—
(1)
administrative matters, including a claim for payment, a matter related to the procurement of property or services, personnel or employment practices, or support services, or a document required by law, rule, or regulation to be submitted to the Congress or any office or officer within the legislative branch; or
(2)
any investigation or review, conducted pursuant to the authority of any committee, subcommittee, commission or office of the Congress, consistent with applicable rules of the House or Senate.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 749; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(L), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147; Pub. L. 104–292, § 2, Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3459; Pub. L. 108–458, title VI, § 6703(a), Dec. 17, 2004, 118 Stat. 3766; Pub. L. 109–248, title I, § 141(c), July 27, 2006, 120 Stat. 603.)
 

AlmightyBender

Executive Member
Joined
Aug 24, 2012
Messages
7,249
Your link supports what I am saying, greg. Thanks for that.

Can you please identify how the supposed lie is material to any legitimate FBI investigation?

While I wait for you to scramble to answer this question with some sort of legal basis (while you are at it, maybe you can show ANY precedent for an indictment based on the Logan Act in support of your argument), here is a song for you which I know you can relate to.

Material to the Mueller investigation? No
Material to laws requiring citizens acting as foreign agents to declare their interests etc? Yes

You are arguing that during a robbery investigation if the police happen to find evidence of a murder that perp is immune from prosecution for murder because the investigation was about the robbery. Is that the type of world you are advocating?
 

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
Material to the Mueller investigation? No
Material to laws requiring citizens acting as foreign agents to declare their interests etc? Yes

You are arguing that during a robbery investigation if the police happen to find evidence of a murder that perp is immune from prosecution for murder because the investigation was about the robbery. Is that the type of world you are advocating?

Declare what interests, AlmightyBender?

Show precedent. The law was enacted in 1799. Surely you can find something to demonstrate that this lie was material in any shape or form from a law that has been on the books for over 200 years?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top