US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
Emjay

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Emjay

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
greg0205 said:
So, 'ol Bill *didn't* advise HW to pardon Weinberger, Abrams, Clarridge, Fiers, George and McFarlane.

Interesting revision of *actual* history you have going there, Em.
Click to expand...

And you are deflecting again. Do you even know how to play the ball, greg?

And, since this was an actual argument you made not a few hours ago: Which is sooner. 2016, or 1992? Does your arbitrary statute of limitations not apply here?

Q, it's followers and greg. Same energy.
 
cerebus

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Emjay said:
Let's get to the crux of the matter.



The FBI had already done an investigation on this front and determined that there was no derogatory evidence against Flynn. They were ready to close the investigation and this is a matter of record. Strzok held the investigation open by way of his Logan Act idea, which means that Flynn's lie regarding his conversation with Kislyak would not have been material to any ongoing investigation, especially since Flynn was entitled to discuss diplomatic issues with Kislyak as incoming national security advisor.
Click to expand...

Emjay: Regurgitates literal Qanon conspiracies
Also Emjay: You sound like Q
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Emjay said:
And you are deflecting again. Do you even know how to play the ball, greg?

And, since this was an actual argument you made not a few hours ago: Which is sooner. 2016, or 1992? Does your arbitrary statute of limitations not apply here?

Q, it's followers and greg. Same energy.
Click to expand...

Greg: Bill Barr's entire professional life has been dedicated to helping Republicans avoid justice. It's 2020, but here he is in '92 getting HW to pardon Republicans involved in Reagan's Iran Contra affair... I said *entire* professional life and I meant it.

Emjay: I can't distinguish between a demonstrated life-long pattern of behaviour and a legal statute of limitations.
 
rietrot

rietrot

Honorary Master
Joined
Aug 26, 2016
Messages
33,200
greg0205 said:
Greg: Bill Barr's entire professional life has been dedicated to helping Republicans avoid justice. It's 2020, but here he is in '92 getting HW to pardon Republicans involved in Reagan's Iran Contra affair... I said *entire* professional life and I meant it.

Emjay: I can't distinguish between a demonstrated life-long pattern of behaviour and a legal statute of limitations.
Click to expand...
The guys entire professional life can't be the crime,/wrongdoing. The crime is specific events.

Something that happened in '92 falls way outside your 4 year statute of limitations. Sorry greg.

You made this rule, now live with it.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
rietrot said:
The guys entire professional life can't be the crime,/wrongdoing. The crime is specific events.

Something that happened in '92 falls way outside your 4 year statute of limitations. Sorry greg.

You made this rule, now live with it.
Click to expand...

TIL that pointing out that Trumpists *still* go on and on about her emails means history started four years ago.

Pretty sure the very last thing folk like you and Em will be wheezing on your deathbeds will be "lock her up".
 
Emjay

Emjay

Honorary Master
Joined
Jun 18, 2005
Messages
15,016
rietrot said:
The guys entire professional life can't be the crime,/wrongdoing. The crime is specific events.

Something that happened in '92 falls way outside your 4 year statute of limitations. Sorry greg.

You made this rule, now live with it.
Click to expand...

Zero self awareness that guy. But I don't expect anything better from someone that puts down a legal matter to 1+1=2.

cerebus said:
Emjay: Regurgitates literal Qanon conspiracies
Also Emjay: You sound like Q
Click to expand...

I see you have engaged in this and not my previous post that I actually address to you in good faith. :ROFL: Would love you to show what is a conspiracy theory? There is LITERAL proof of what I am saying.

But, please can you try educate me some more. Can you demonstrate what Q conspiracy I have been pushing? Or any other conspiracy theories?

greg0205 said:
TIL that pointing out that Trumpists *still* go on and on about her emails means history started four years ago.

Pretty sure the very last thing folk like you and Em will be wheezing on your deathbeds will be "lock her up".
Click to expand...

I know you battle to read, so read this slowly: I DON'T CARE ABOUT HER EMAILS. I was putting your pathetic legal analogy into another context so you can understand how moronic you sound.
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Emjay said:
Zero self awareness that guy. But I don't expect anything better from someone that puts down a legal matter to 1+1=2.



I see you have engaged in this and not my previous post that I actually address to you in good faith. :ROFL: Would love you to show what is a conspiracy theory? There is LITERAL proof of what I am saying.

But, please can you try educate me some more. Can you demonstrate what Q conspiracy I have been pushing? Or any other conspiracy theories?



I know you battle to read, so read this slowly: I DON'T CARE ABOUT HER EMAILS. I was putting your pathetic legal analogy into another context so you can understand how moronic you sound.
Click to expand...

David Attenborough: When cornered, the female Emjay emits a low-pitched 'adhominem' growl to ward off potential attackers. When the danger passes, she retreats to her den with a high-pitched 'Harumph' which can be heard for miles.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STS
Gnarls

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,909
greg0205 said:
David Attenborough: When cornered, the female Emjay emits a low-pitched 'adhominem' growl to ward off potential attackers. When the danger passes, she retreats to her den with a high-pitched 'Harumph' which can be heard for miles.
Click to expand...

why don't you just answer her Greg?
 
greg0205

greg0205

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 18, 2010
Messages
28,863
Gnarls said:
why don't you just answer her Greg?
Click to expand...

Well, what do you know?

Gnarls would also like to, these-aren't-the-droids-you're-looking-for hand-wave away Mike Pence, Sally Yates, Mary McCord, federal prosecutors and federal judges so we can dig into what's really, really important about... Mikey pleading guilty.

Y'all know any other tunes, or just the one?
 
cerebus

cerebus

Honorary Master
Joined
Nov 5, 2007
Messages
49,122
Emjay said:
I see you have engaged in this and not my previous post that I actually address to you in good faith. :ROFL: Would love you to show what is a conspiracy theory? There is LITERAL proof of what I am saying.
Click to expand...



www.nytimes.com

Opinion | Bill Barr Twisted My Words in Dropping the Flynn Case. Here’s the Truth. (Published 2020)

The F.B.I.’s interview of Mr. Flynn was constitutional, lawful and for a legitimate counterintelligence purpose.
www.nytimes.com www.nytimes.com

The Barr-Shea motion to dismiss refers to my descriptions of the F.B.I.’s justification for not wanting to notify the new administration about the potential Flynn compromise as “vacillating from the potential compromise of a ‘counterintelligence’ investigation to the protection of a purported ‘criminal’ investigation.” But that “vacillation” has no bearing on whether the F.B.I. was justified in engaging in a voluntary interview with Mr. Flynn. It has no bearing on whether Mr. Flynn’s lies to the F.B.I. were material to its investigation into any links or coordination between Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia’s efforts to interfere in the 2016 election.

And perhaps more significant, it has no bearing on whether Mr. Flynn’s lies to the F.B.I. were material to the clear counterintelligence threat posed by the susceptible position Mr. Flynn put himself in when he told Mr. Pence and others in the new administration that he had not discussed the sanctions with Mr. Kislyak. The materiality is obvious.

In short, the report of my interview does not anywhere suggest that the F.B.I.’s interview of Mr. Flynn was unconstitutional, unlawful or not “tethered” to any legitimate counterintelligence purpose.
 
Gnarls

Gnarls

Expert Member
Joined
May 20, 2008
Messages
4,909
greg0205 said:
Well, what do you know?

Gnarls would also like to, these-aren't-the-droids-you're-looking-for hand-wave away Mike Pence, Sally Yates, Mary McCord, federal prosecutors and federal judges so we can dig into what's really, really important about... Mikey pleading guilty.

Y'all know any other tunes, or just the one?
Click to expand...

Still no answer I see.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top