US Election 2020

[rietrot]

Pity the Democrats don't take a hard line against sexual assault allegations when it does not suit their political agenda.

Maybe they just take #metoo to literally. FOMO or something.

 

[Emjay]

Twenty five women have accused Donnie. Twenty five.

Time for Republicans to take a hard line against sexual assault allegations yet, Em?

Yes, they should. I never said they shouldn't. Your whataboutisim is noted. So I am now going to use my own. We discussed Kavanaugh for months. We got to sit and watch multiple televised testimonies, and read thousands of articles about this. I distinctly recall how so many people here were twisting into little pretzels because even the ALLEGATIONS of impropriety disqualified Kavanaugh from consideration. Yet, here we are where there is not an iota of shits from the usual Progressive Lefty crowd.

Sexual assault allegations are used as weapons by the politicians, and people like you enable it.

 

[TysonRoux]

View attachment 838933

Beacon of morality, devout Christian has his very own televangelist, Paula White.
She speaks to him in tongues, and the Orange Dotard understands every word.

Paula White: the pastor who helps Trump hear 'what God has to say'

The head of a Florida megachurch says Trump spent hours seeking advice from God on a presidential run

www.theguardian.com

 

[greg0205]

Yes, they should. I never said they shouldn't. Your whataboutisim is noted. So I am now going to use my own. We discussed Kavanaugh for months. We got to sit and watch multiple televised testimonies, and read thousands of articles about this. I distinctly recall how so many people here were twisting into little pretzels because even the ALLEGATIONS of impropriety disqualified Kavanaugh from consideration. Yet, here we are where there is not an iota of shits from the usual Progressive Lefty crowd.

Sexual assault allegations are used as weapons by the politicians, and people like you enable it.

Emjay:

Sexual assault allegations are used as weapons by the politicians, and people like you enable it.

Also Emjay:

Pity the Democrats don't take a hard line against sexual assault allegations when it does not suit their political agenda.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

https://www.wsj.com/articles/biden-...direct=amp#click=[URL]https://t.co/r8vdOsmfMw

[/URL]

Key takeaway: Biden will also take a hard line on China as well as be sceptical of free trade. Democrats finally realising they need to adopt a more "patriotic" agenda. This is good.

You know that will affect Britain as well?

 

[TysonRoux]

BWHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Obama got under the skin of the Orange Dotard's boys.

Mitch McConnell: Obama 'should have kept his mouth shut' instead of criticizing US coronavirus response

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday slammed former President Barack Obama for criticizing the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic during a private call last week, asserting that he "should have kept his mouth shut."

www.cnn.com

Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell on Monday slammed former President Barack Obama for criticizing the Trump administration's response to the coronavirus pandemic during a private call last week, asserting that he "should have kept his mouth shut."
"I think it's a little bit classless, frankly, to critique an administration that comes after you,"

or before you !!!!!

 

[Emjay]

Your ree-ing about Mikey suggests otherwise, Em.

And once again you expose your shallow reasoning. It's not about Michael Flynn. You know I have roots in law. I have a deep appreciation for it. How it is structured, the processes around it. Checks. Balances. So I wouldn't expect you to understand my POV. Because you only play the person, and never the ball and always ascribe to things in your small narrow world view.

Emjay:

Also Emjay:

Like I said. The person. Never the ball.

The truth is often uncomfortable, Greg.

 

[greg0205]

And once again you expose your shallow reasoning. It's not about Michael Flynn. You know I have roots in law. I have a deep appreciation for it. How it is structured, the processes around it. Checks. Balances. So I wouldn't expect you to understand my POV. Because you only play the person, and never the ball and always ascribe to things in your small narrow world view.



Like I said. The person. Never the ball.

The truth is often uncomfortable, Greg.

Emjay:

Like I said. The person. Never the ball.

Also Emjay:

Holy cow. I have not seen such angst since high school.

And I don't post on forums debasing my recently departed family members to make a point to strangers on the internet. I judge people based on their actions, and not some imaginary associations in my head. SMH.

I used to think you are funny. Now you are just cringey.

I know you battle to read

Zero self awareness that guy.

Do you have a problem understanding basic English?

Because those aged eyes are really not doing too good.

You want I should go on?

 

[greg0205]

Still no answer greggypants. Waiting...

So, not Em or Gnarls... It was you I was thinking of.

The Logan act deflection has been asked and answered here... But maybe it was you, rather than Em I was thinking of when I posted this for her:

To Trump, ‘Complete and Total Exoneration’ Is Always Right Around the Corner

The president and his supporters continue to fixate on the Russia investigation, perpetually expecting redemption.

www.theatlantic.com

 

[Emjay]

Emjay:

Also Emjay:

You want I should go on?

I am not unaware of my posts at all. I even expect a mod to step in at some stage. *shrug*

You still have not raised any valid point for your argument. Not one. cerebus has done all the heavy lifting, even though it does not address any of the questions I have actually asked. Odd how you don't see this as white knighting.

 

[cerebus]

And once again you expose your shallow reasoning. It's not about Michael Flynn. You know I have roots in law. I have a deep appreciation for it. How it is structured, the processes around it. Checks. Balances.

Just not when the checks and balances affect the president, right?

 

[Emjay]

Just not when the checks and balances affect the president, right?

Sky’s the limit when you don’t need to prove your assertions

This is an ongoing pattern with you.

 

[Techne]

So, not Em or Gnarls... It was you I was thinking of.

Make it very clear what you are insinuating here because it looks like you first falsely accused someone else, backtracked and now you are falsely accusing me.

 

[cerebus]

Yet, here we are where there is not an iota of shits from the usual Progressive Lefty crowd.

You do realize that everyone on the thread unanimously agreed that the Biden allegations should be properly investigated right?

/Emjay - No, actually I didn't see that, I haven't been on here much lately
/Cerebus - Oh that's quite ok, we all have busy lives

 

[theratman]

Emjay:


Also Emjay:














You want I should go on?

So much for playing the ball then.

 

[Jabulani22]

Did Greg just use revenge porn to shame a guy in a Halloween costume ?

 

[greg0205]

I am not unaware of my posts at all. I even expect a mod to step in at some stage. *shrug*

You still have not raised any valid point for your argument. Not one. cerebus has done all the heavy lifting, even though it does not address any of the questions have actually asked. Odd how you don't see this as white knighting.

Nothing will.

The Logan act BS is an ointment for a rash you can't scratch. It relieves the burn for a moment but doesn't treat the infection... And you *need* to mask the infection.

You *need* "total exoneration". You *need* Obamagate. You *need* her emails.

You need all of it to feel better when you hand-wave away 81 491 dead Americans... when you hand-wave away 25 sexual assault accusations... when you hand-wave away 26 million jobs lost... When, when, when...

You *need* folk looking the other way, not directly at your god-emperor on his throne that sits on atop a pile of jobless and dead Americans... That's the rash that burns and it's not going away, so you need an ointment to feel better yourself.

Nothing will address any of the questions you've actually asked. You can't allow it.

 

[Gnarls]

Nothing will.

The Logan act BS is an ointment for a rash you can't scratch. It relieves the burn for a moment but doesn't treat the infection... And you *need* to mask the infection.

You *need* "total exoneration". You *need* Obamagate. You *need* her emails.

You need all of it to feel better when you hand-wave away 81 491 dead Americans... when you hand-wave away 25 sexual assault accusations... when you hand-wave away 26 million jobs lost... When, when, when...

You *need* folk looking the other way, not directly at your god-emperor on his throne that sits on atop a pile of jobless and dead Americans... That's the rash that burns and it's not going away, so you need an ointment to feel better yourself.

Nothing will address any of the questions you've actually asked. You can't allow it.

Stop talking rubbish Greg. You're just a troll.

You still have not raised any valid point for your argument. Not one. cerebus has done all the heavy lifting, even though it does not address any of the questions I have actually asked. Odd how you don't see this as white knighting.

 

[greg0205]

Stop talking rubbish Greg. You're just a troll.

Congratulations Gnarls. You got "you're" right!

 

[Gnarls]

Congratulations Gnarls. You got "you're" right!

Leftard response is leftard.