US Election 2020

[Gnarls]

Still not constructive

Ok, I'll make a spelling or grammar mistake to you can correct me ok snowflake?

 

[buka001]

Yawn.

I knew you would be the first to comment and I knew it would be so deep and insightful, as your post here.

Perhaps the author is on to something here?

 

[cerebus]

Ok, I'll make a spelling or grammar mistake to you can correct me ok snowflake?

Your grammar is usually pretty good, snowflake

 

[Gnarls]

^Still not ignoring me I see.

I knew you would be the first to comment and I knew it would be so deep and insightful, as your post here.

Perhaps the author is on to something here?

It's an opinion piece and a dumb opinion piece at that. How more deep and insightful do I need to be?

 

[Techne]

I wonder if this article speaks about some of Trump's supporters here.

Donald Trump, the Most Unmanly President

Why don’t the president’s supporters hold him to their own standard of masculinity?

www.theatlantic.com

They should have voted for manly Hillary. But hey, at least they now have the option of manly Biden.

Bloody hell the MSM partisan propagandists cannot possibly be this dumb and believe people actually still fall for this BS.

 

[cerebus]

^Still not ignoring me I see.



It's an opinion piece and a dumb opinion piece at that. How more deep and insightful do I need to be?

You could offer something constructive, like an actual critique of the points in the article, instead of your usual vapid trolling. Of course you won't because you're incapable of it

 

[Gnarls]

You could offer something constructive, like an actual critique of the points in the article, instead of your usual vapid trolling. Of course you won't because you're incapable of it

Attack of the entitled snowflakes. I suggest you figure out what trolling is snowflake. Calling an opinion piece dumb is not trolling. Now would you like to waste more time Karen?

By your stupid definition this:

lol weird expectation

And this:

They should have voted for manly Hillary. But hey, at least they now have the option of manly Biden.

Bloody hell the MSM partisan propagandists cannot possibly be this dumb and believe people actually still fall for this BS.

Is trolling.

 

[buka001]

^Still not ignoring me I see.



It's an opinion piece and a dumb opinion piece at that. How more deep and insightful do I need to be?

On point. As expected of you.

 

[Techne]

You could offer something constructive, like an actual critique of the points in the article, instead of your usual vapid trolling. Of course you won't because you're incapable of it

Aaw shame, he didn't fall for the BS trolling and now you are a little meany "decent" person.

 

[Gnarls]

On point. As expected of you.

Your article is dumb get over it snowflake.

 

[buka001]

Your article is dumb get over it snowflake.

Hitting all the notes today. Why are you such a stereotype?

 

[Gnarls]

Hitting all the notes today. Why are you such a stereotype?

Ok snowflake.

 

[buka001]

Ok snowflake.

Perhaps the article is dumb? Who knows, as you are once again incapable of actually presenting a counter point with any resemblance of a argument.

Perhaps this article hits a subconscious nerve with you, given your childish engagement over it thus far.

 

[Gnarls]

Perhaps the article is dumb? Who knows, as you are once again incapable of actually presenting a counter point with any resemblance of a argument.

Buka building strawman again. Maybe I just knew the debate would come to this and wanted to subvert it? Maybe I just don't want to waste time? Who knows? Buka does!

Perhaps this article hits a subconscious nerve with you, given your childish engagement over it thus far.

Now gaslighting in aisle one. And your OP:

I wonder if this article speaks about some of Trump's supporters here.

Donald Trump, the Most Unmanly President

Why don’t the president’s supporters hold him to their own standard of masculinity?

www.theatlantic.com

Not chumming the water at all there eh Buka? But sure not wanting to partake in your bad faith debating is trolling on my behalf. Lolz!

 

[konfab]

Boldly asserted with zero evidence.

Meanwhile I gave you evidence that the public support it.

Here's more:

Poll: Most Americans disapprove of anti-lockdown protests

A new survey released by the Center for Public Affairs Research found that 55% of Americans disapprove of anti-quarantine protests. Democrats are more likely than Republicans to disapprove of such protests.

www.csmonitor.com

8 In 10 Americans Support COVID-19 Shutdown, Kaiser Health Poll Finds

Only around 20% of Americans say shelter-in-place measures are "causing more harm than good," the Kaiser Family Foundation reports.

www.npr.org

In new poll, 60 percent support keeping stay-at-home restrictions to fight coronavirus

Fifty-eight percent say they are more worried about stopping the virus' spread, while 32 percent are more concerned with the economic fallout, a new NBC News/WSJ poll shows.

www.nbcnews.com

So why does the government need the police to enforce it?

And did you miss this little chart?

The same percentage, of around 80% of Americans, also say they can follow the restrictions for at least one more month.

https://www.npr.org/sections/corona...rt-covid-19-shutdown-kaiser-health-poll-finds

Given that we are 1 month after the poll was taken:

3% cannot follow guidelines at all
14% Can follow them for less than a month
37% Can follow them for 1-4 months<- We are here.
10% Can follow them for 6 months
34% Can follow them for more than 6 months.


So 1 month after the poll, 17% of people won't be able to follow the restrictions.
4 months after the poll, 54% of people won't be able to follow the restrictions.

So I think I was fairly on point with this. Especially as I think those numbers are quite conservative.

 

[rietrot]

I wonder if this article speaks about some of Trump's supporters here.

Donald Trump, the Most Unmanly President

Why don’t the president’s supporters hold him to their own standard of masculinity?

www.theatlantic.com

Lol, because nobody cares about masculinity. That an obsession on the left not on the right. And then how you define it is also wrong.

 

[R13...]

Why does Trump hate Fox News now? I mean they might not be 100% lodged behind him any more but they are for the most part supporting him. And that they're accepting Dem talking points is ridiculous as all they seem to have done to prick his thin skin was allowing those anti Trump ads by some in the GOP.

 

[SoldierMan]

I wonder if this article speaks about some of Trump's supporters here.

Donald Trump, the Most Unmanly President

Why don’t the president’s supporters hold him to their own standard of masculinity?

www.theatlantic.com

Like Gnarls said, that has to be one of the stupidest articles ever. Trying to have a go at Trump supporters but just ending up on the trash heap of astoundingly idiotic attempts at journalism

Guess that explains why buka001 was attracted to it and actually reposted it......

 

[buka001]

Buka building strawman again. Maybe I just knew the debate would come to this and wanted to subvert it? Maybe I just don't want to waste time? Who knows? Buka does!



Now gaslighting in aisle one. And your OP:



Not chumming the water at all there eh Buka? But sure not wanting to partake in your bad faith debating is trolling on my behalf. Lolz!

You seem to be affected by this article and have not provided a reasonable argument to demonstrate your views in opposition to it.

Hence, I can only infer that you feel as if the author is talking about you?

 

[buka001]

Like Gnarls said, that has to be one of the stupidest articles ever. Trying to have a go at Trump supporters but just ending up on the trash heap of astoundingly idiotic attempts at journalism

Guess that explains why buka001 was attracted to it and actually reposted it......

Why is it stupid? What is stupid about the points made?

What is your view in opposition to the points made and why do you hold that view?