US Election 2020

[ISP cash cow]

O my fok but we've got a bright one on our hands here boy. Did you notice the word "FIRSTLY", did ya? That is what I was emphasising in my post

Then I said "secondly", which means less emphasis in case you don't understand the difference. But if you actually read the WHOLE sentence of my second point and not just the part that makes your little brain tick over then you will get the full meaning of what I said and why I said it. Let's see shall we:



You seem to have missed the bold part. Did you notice that if you take the bold part into account it then actually lines up with what I said in my first point. The TIME at which the president was playing golf, not the how much. Wow, you seem to have a huge comprehension problem

I hope that sorts it out for you. So next time, take CONTEXT into account, as well as the WHOLE sentence, not just the little bits that ticks a box in your Democrat/Republican good/bad worldview.

the context dumbass is that you brought it up that Obama played more golf than Trump, whether it was your first, second or final point - it does not take "it out of context" you made an assumption and you made an "ass" out of U and got pawned.

also the fact that you see it as such an awesome thing that "it was the first time he played golf since the lockdown" speaks paramount to you what you value in your leader. It would be interesting to see if he would have gone out and played Golf if all the golf courses weren't locked down because of the you know "lockdown"

You know Soldierboy, you have me wondering, if the democratic supporters in this thread are actually right that it is only hicks and hillbillies that support trump because it seems education and knowledge seem to be missing from most of his supporters in this thread.

 

[TysonRoux]

Why does Trump hate Fox News now? I mean they might not be 100% lodged behind him any more but they are for the most part supporting him. And that they're accepting Dem talking points is ridiculous as all they seem to have done to prick his thin skin was allowing those anti Trump ads by some in the GOP.

The Orange Dotard is p!sssssed because he thought Faux News was the only one that was on his side, ....... until they ran Mourning in America, paid for by Republicans.

 

[TysonRoux]

You know Soldierboy, you have me wondering, if the democratic supporters in this thread are actually right that it is only hicks and hillbillies that support trump because it seems education and knowledge seem to be missing from most of his supporters in this thread.

Can't believe there was ever any doubt.

 

[SoldierMan]

the context dumbass is that you brought it up that Obama played more golf than Trump, whether it was your first, second or final point - it does not take "it out of context" you made an assumption and you made an "ass" out of U and got pawned.

also the fact that you see it as such an awesome thing that "it was the first time he played golf since the lockdown" speaks paramount to you what you value in your leader. It would be interesting to see if he would have gone out and played Golf if all the golf courses weren't locked down because of the you know "lockdown"

You know Soldierboy, you have me wondering, if the democratic supporters in this thread are actually right that it is only hicks and hillbillies that support trump because it seems education and knowledge seem to be missing from most of his supporters in this thread.

Clearly leftist Democrat supporters in SA don't have enough brain cells to understand basic English or common sense.

You completely missed the points I made, even emphasised for you, and instead just went on a tangent hoping not to look like a total fool by deflecting. You failed.

I suggest you re-read my post and try again.

In case you missed it (which you clearly did) - it was the TIME that he played gold not the fact that he played golf, try get that through your thick skull of yours.

 

[buka001]

Constructive debate here folks.



Maybe try comprehend what was said to you.

Lol.

You fail consistently to provide any reasoning to your views.

It is as if you lived during the middle ages and Galileo presented his view on how the earth rotates about the sun, you just dismiss it as stupid.

When asked why, you just dismiss the individuals as snowflakes.

This is all you do.

 

[rietrot]

But Fox runs anti-Democrat ads as well.
MSNBC runs Republican ads.

They are adverts.
Are you saying that they should refuse to run anti-Trump ads (incidentally paid for by Republicans)?

You seem to think that Fox should always be on the Trump-Train and not being so means they are based?

There's clearly an agenda, and they choose to play along. What is the point of a Republican anti Trump add?
That just undermines democracy.

It's a buch of bad losers who couldn't put up a viable candidate in the primaries now batting for the other team. It's ridiculous.

Obviously Trump would call this out.

Fox is free to run whatever adds they wish and to take money from whomever they wish.

 

[Gnarls]

Lol.

You fail consistently to provide any reasoning to your views.

It is as if you lived during the middle ages and Galileo presented his view on how the earth rotates about the sun, you just dismiss it as stupid.

When asked why, you just dismiss the individuals as snowflakes.

This is all you do.

Now falsely equating his rubbish opinion piece to a scientific treatise with a side of gaslighting. This is all you do. You come out here trolling with your ridiculous article, expect to be taken seriously and when you aren't you make up stupid strawman?

But you're not entitled except for wanting people to sincerely interact with your attempt at trolling.

 

[SoldierMan]

Lol.

You fail consistently to provide any reasoning to your views.

It is as if you lived during the middle ages and Galileo presented his view on how the earth rotates about the sun, you just dismiss it as stupid.

When asked why, you just dismiss the individuals as snowflakes.

This is all you do.

Bwahahahahaha

A rubbish bias opinion piece compared to Galileo, you've just gone full retard.

 

[access]

the crying over trump just doesnt stop, i dont know who to keep an eye on for entertainment, him or his opponents. what a fiesta

 

[AlmightyBender]

Now falsely equating his rubbish opinion piece to a scientific treatise with a side of gaslighting. This is all you do. You come out here trolling with your ridiculous article, expect to be taken seriously and when you aren't you make up stupid strawman?

But you're not entitled except for wanting people to sincerely interact with your attempt at trolling.

Bwahahahahaha

A rubbish bias opinion piece compared to Galileo, you've just gone full retard.

Are you guys aware of what an analogy is?

 

[Gnarls]

Are you guys aware of what an analogy is?

Are you aware of what false equivalence, gaslighting and strawmen are?

Analogy
a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.
"an analogy between the workings of nature and those of human societies"
a correspondence or partial similarity.
"the syndrome is called deep dysgraphia because of its analogy to deep dyslexia"
a thing which is comparable to something else in significant respects.
"works of art were seen as an analogy for works of nature"

 

[buka001]

Now falsely equating his rubbish opinion piece to a scientific treatise with a side of gaslighting. This is all you do. You come out here trolling with your ridiculous article, expect to be taken seriously and when you aren't you make up stupid strawman?

But you're not entitled except for wanting people to sincerely interact with your attempt at trolling.

And yet you cannot string more than 3 words together to explain why it is ridiculous and choose to shoot the messenger instead as it takes less intellectual capacity and prudence to do so.

Your belligerent tactic to never actually engage on any point with your own view in your own words is stereotypical of Trump supporters.

I mean you clearly still think its 2016 and somehow the term snowflake means something to you?

 

[buka001]

Bwahahahahaha

A rubbish bias opinion piece compared to Galileo, you've just gone full retard.

Cool story bro.

Any chance you could elucidate me on why it is a rubbish article? What are the salient points with which you disagree and why?

How do you explain the phenomenon that the author describes?

 

[Gnarls]

And yet you cannot string more than 3 words together to explain why it is ridiculous and choose to shoot the messenger instead as it takes less intellectual capacity and prudence to do so.

Your belligerent tactic to never actually engage on any point with your own view in your own words is stereotypical of Trump supporters.

I mean you clearly still think its 2016 and somehow the term snowflake means something to you?

More entitlement. Maybe I just don't have time to engage with it. But of course Buka will ascribe this to you can't tell me why this is stupid.

This is particularly rich coming from the guy who comments on videos without watching them.

 

[buka001]

Are you aware of what false equivalence, gaslighting and strawmen are?

Listening to science in the middle ages actually required someone to engage with the points made and review it.

Instead people chose not to engage and merely executed the scientists or the messenger without choosing to say how or why they disagreed with them.

This is your primary strategy throughout.

 

[Biscuit1018]

There's clearly an agenda, and they choose to play along. What is the point of a Republican anti Trump add?
That just undermines democracy.

It's a buch of bad losers who couldn't put up a viable candidate in the primaries now batting for the other team. It's ridiculous.

Obviously Trump would call this out.

Fox is free to run whatever adds they wish and to take money from whomever they wish.

Trump is free to whine about whoever he wants to whine about.

It is not anti-democracy. Republicans don't have to love their "Dear Leader". In fact being able to oppose Trump is precisely what democracy is all about. If the RNC wants to make Trump-love a condition of membership they can do so. But they won't because it is anti-democratic.
They can call him out. They are doing so in an Ad. And Trump's supporters can call out these Republicans.

Under your rules.
I still don't understand why you have an issue with Fox? I don't understand what Fox are supposed to do?
I don't understand what Republican anti-Trumpers are supposed to do?
Your issue seems to be because they are running an attack-Advert against the guy you like?

Some people don't like Trump. Simple as that. Trump should deal with it, without sounding like a juvenile.

 

[AlmightyBender]

Are you aware of what false equivalence, gaslighting and strawmen are?

a comparison between one thing and another, typically for the purpose of explanation or clarification.

An imaginary scenario of you arguing with Galileo was compared to how you argue with us to explain and clarify to you that you follow a formulaic pattern of engagement which does nothing to address to content and substance of the position you are attempting to argue against.

In the past I have used the analogy of a 'script' to try illustrate the same point to you.

 

[AlmightyBender]

But I still don't understand why you have an issue with Fox?
Your issue seems to be because they are running an Ad for the guy you like?

Our resident MAGAs want the destruction of all media that isn't YouTube content creators that tell them exactly what they want to hear. Simple as that.

 

[buka001]

More entitlement. Maybe I just don't have time to engage with it. But of course Buka will ascribe this to you can't tell me why this is stupid.

Cool story bro.

You had time to read it and reply with the eponymous, well rounded and deeply thoughtful "yawn".

If you had no time, then it would have taken less time to ignore it without a response, than to respond with a yawn and the subsequent childish tactics and deflections you have laid forth.

 

[Gnarls]

Listening to science in the middle ages actually required someone to engage with the points made and review it.

Instead people chose not to engage and merely executed the scientists or the messenger without choosing to say how or why they disagreed with them.

This is your primary strategy throughout.

An imaginary scenario of you arguing with Galileo was compared to how you argue with us to explain and clarify to you that you follow a formulaic pattern of engagement which does nothing to address to content and substance of the position you are attempting to argue against.

In the past I have used the analogy of a 'script' to try illustrate the same point to you.

Yassis more nonsense. The article is dumb. Others have posited why but these two want it in my own words or I'm a heretic. However just post a Zero Hedge or Fox article and watch their heads explode.

Cool story bro.

You had time to read it and reply with the eponymous, well rounded and deeply thoughtful "yawn".

If you had no time, then it would have taken less time to ignore it without a response, than to respond with a yawn and the subsequent childish tactics and deflections you have laid forth.

This guy is precious. Buka is now also the arbiter of peoples time as well as the comms devices to which they have access.. I already said I yawned at your vapid trolling attempt. But keep telling us you're not entitled.