US Election 2020

[ISP cash cow]

Clearly leftist Democrat supporters in SA don't have enough brain cells to understand basic English or common sense.

You completely missed the points I made, even emphasised for you, and instead just went on a tangent hoping not to look like a total fool by deflecting. You failed.

I suggest you re-read my post and try again.

In case you missed it (which you clearly did) - it was the TIME that he played gold not the fact that he played golf, try get that through your thick skull of yours.

yeah this comment would make more sense soldierboy if I was a democratic, but I ain't. I just come in this thread here to read what people are writing about Trump and I just seen a huge pile of crap with regards to your posts. at least Emjay and Gingerbeardman used to actually debate with some gusto and not just feels.


Maybe don't debate with people if you cannot handle it - maybe stick to something you can handle like, I don't know, playing lego?

here is the timeline again for your interest sake

Yes, all presidents golf
Point is it is the first time since the lockdown.

as mentioned would be hard for him to golf while all the golf courses are Locked down you know like closed.

Secondly, your beloved Obama played more golf than anyone no matter what was going on, and I'm sure you wouldn't criticise Obama if he slit a babies throat, so roll back your criticism of Trump there otherwise comparisons with Obama will be made.

Ooh please make comparisons with Obama, come on. Bring out the numbers

Are we playing a "who done it more" game, how about we compare Executive Orders... something Obama said he would never do.

yes, yes you were playing a "who done it more game" when you brought it up that Obama had played more golf than Trump and commented "take it back or comparisons would be made".... dum... dum..... dum........ (those are drum beats not your intelligence level although it would be close )

 

[AlmightyBender]

Yassis more nonsense. The article is dumb. Others have posited why but these two want it in my own words or I'm a heretic. However just post a Zero Hedge or Fox article and watch their heads explode.



This guy is precious. Buka is now also the arbiter of peoples time as well as the comms devices to which they have access.. I already said I yawned at your vapid trolling attempt. But keep telling us you're not entitled.

Cool beans. I will from now on behave as you do to illustrate how you behave. I predict you will get so irritated that you will put me on ignore.

 

[Gnarls]

Cool beans. I will from now on behave as you do to illustrate how you behave. I predict you will get so irritated that you will put me on ignore.

In other words. I have no argument. Thanks for wasting our time.

/edit

Our resident MAGAs want the destruction of all media that isn't YouTube content creators that tell them exactly what they want to hear. Simple as that.

Totally not gaslighting or trolling behaviour. A+ constructive debate here people.

 

[buka001]

Yassis more nonsense. The article is dumb. Others have posited why but these two want it in my own words or I'm a heretic. However just post a Zero Hedge or Fox article and watch their heads explode.



This guy is precious. Buka is now also the arbiter of peoples time as well as the comms devices to which they have access.. I already said I yawned at your vapid trolling attempt. But keep telling us you're not entitled.

If you lack the stamina to address something being discussed, perhaps take a back seat and wait on the "others" to show you how.

And to think back in 2017 the best meme was when conservatives decried the NPC like "group think" behaviour of the left and laughed at the apparent lack of individual thought.

 

[Biscuit1018]

Our resident MAGAs want the destruction of all media that isn't YouTube content creators that tell them exactly what they want to hear. Simple as that.

I suspect you are correct, but I am still hoping for a MAGA to reply.

Fox has some good journos despite their leaning.
Chris Wallace is superb - Asks tough questions no matter who is in the other seat
Brett Baier is pretty good - Hard news.
And a few others
Less said about Judge Janine, Hannity etc, the better.. just cheerleaders

MSNBC is much the same but on the other side.

Youtube - There is some excellent content across ideologies.
There is also some of the worst conspiracy theory laden crap.
My pet hate is these "Channels" where you cant even work out who is behind the channel.
Their videos are often long to hook one into ads. The trouble is people cite these youtubes as evidence.

 

[SoldierMan]

yeah this comment would make more sense soldierboy if I was a democratic, but I ain't. I just come in this thread here to read what people are writing about Trump and I just seen a huge pile of crap with regards to your posts. at least Emjay and Gingerbeardman used to actually debate with some gusto and not just feels.


Maybe don't debate with people if you cannot handle it - maybe stick to something you can handle like, I don't know, playing lego?

here is the timeline again for your interest sake

as mentioned would be hard for him to golf while all the golf courses are Locked down you know like closed.







yes, yes you were playing a "who done it more game" when you brought it up that Obama had played more golf than Trump and commented "take it back or comparisons would be made".... dum... dum..... dum........ (those are drum beats not your intelligence level although it would be close )

My fok but the point just keeps on missing you, you're like the little train that could, but doesn't quite make it. Perhaps your IQ just isn't up to the task.

I suggest you refrain from getting into debates in which you can't quite comprehend the nuances of.

 

[Gnarls]

If you lack the stamina to address something being discussed, perhaps take a back seat and wait on the "others" to show you how.

Buka on his high horse. Please forward all submissions to him. He will then decide whether your post or arguments have the required level of stamina. Rigorous stuff!

And to think back in 2017 the best meme was when conservatives decried the NPC like "group think" behaviour of the left and laughed at the apparent lack of individual thought.

More gaslighting. I already said your article is DUMB! You know you could just have ignored the post without getting all triggered but yet, here we are.

 

[buka001]

Buka on his high horse. Please forward all submission to him. He will then decide whether your post or arguments have the required stamina level.



More gaslighting. I already said your article is DUMB! You know you could just have ignored the post without getting all triggered but yet, here we are.

I wanted to know why you think it is dumb. I was hoping that perhaps you had managed to get out and de-stress and you were turning a new leaf and had decided to actually put your point of view forward.

But alas, my original instincts about you proved correct and you have gone to great lengths to chastise my post, without actually saying why.

So it leaves me to speculate the following -

A) You never read it. Saw that I posted it and felt that you could play 2016 style childish tactics and sh!+post the article away, for the fun of it and have no will or fortitude to engage on the subject.

B) You read it and felt on a sub conscious level that Tom was speaking about you and to a degree felt that you needed to deflect from your feelings on this by distracting away from the article with incoherent ramblings and slurs.

 

[SoldierMan]

Our resident MAGAs want the destruction of all media that isn't YouTube content creators that tell them exactly what they want to hear. Simple as that.

Hahahaha what muppet you are. It is the left that is trying to do that, CNN want to shut down opinions that they deem "wrong". Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and other leftists owned media have actually shut down thousands of conservative accounts. I suggest you get your facts straight before spouting nonsense, but I guess I'm not surprised at your ignorant bias.

 

[Gnarls]

I wanted to know why you think it is dumb. I was hoping that perhaps you had managed to get out and de-stress and you were turning a new leaf and had decided to actually put your point of view forward.

But alas, my original instincts about you proved correct and you have gone to great lengths to chastise my post, without actually saying why.

So it leaves me to speculate the following -

A) You never read it. Saw that I posted it and felt that you could play 2016 style childish tactics and sh!+post the article away, for the fun of it and have no will or fortitude to engage on the subject.

B) You read it and felt on a sub conscious level that Tom was speaking about you and to a degree felt that you needed to deflect from your feelings on this by distracting away from the article with incoherent ramblings and slurs.

Lol, speculate away. "Yawn" and "Your article is dumb" constitute great lengths. You're a funny guy. I have no will to engage you on the subject hence me posting "Yawn" - an expression of exactly how much of a schitt I gave about it. You going apoplectic was a bonus though, thanks!

 

[rietrot]

Trump is free to whine about whoever he wants to whine about.

It is not anti-democracy. Republicans don't have to love their "Dear Leader". In fact being able to oppose Trump is precisely what democracy is all about. If the RNC wants to make Trump-love a condition of membership they can do so. But they won't because it is anti-democratic.
They can call him out. They are doing so in an Ad. And Trump's supporters can call out these Republicans.

Under your rules.
I still don't understand why you have an issue with Fox? I don't understand what Fox are supposed to do?
I don't understand what Republican anti-Trumpers are supposed to do?
Your issue seems to be because they are running an attack-Advert against the guy you like?

Some people don't like Trump. Simple as that. Trump should deal with it, without sounding like a juvenile.

I don't have an issue with fox. I don't care for fox. I wasn't the one to bring fox up or the adds. I haven't even seen the adds.
Someone asked what was going on between Trump and Fox and I simply said Fox is running anti Trump adds so obviously he is happy with that.

 

[buka001]

Lol, speculate away. "Yawn" and "Your article is dumb" constitute great lengths. You're a funny guy. I have no will to engage you on the subject hence me posting "Yawn" - an expression of exactly how much of a schitt I gave about it. You going apoplectic was a bonus though, thanks!

Posting something was still indicative of some motivation for something.

The fact that you cared enough to post something, is actually something, as opposed to ignoring it outright.

That something says something about you in two ways. Namely a reaction to me posting something or something related to the article.

The degree to which you engaged with it further and the lack of any coherent argument adds weight to such inferences.

You are a one-trick pony and act right on cue, as expected, always.

 

[Gnarls]

Posting something was still indicative of some motivation for something.

The fact that you cared enough to post something, is actually something, as opposed to ignoring it outright.

That something says something about you in two ways. Namely a reaction to me posting something or something related to the article.

The degree to which you engaged with it further and the lack of any coherent argument adds weight to such inferences.

You are a one-trick pony and act right on cue, as expected, always.

yes, I read you article and thought it dumb. I never said I didn't care and I also said I didn't care to engage you on it. Just move on guy!

 

[rietrot]

Posting something was still indicative of some motivation for something.

The fact that you cared enough to post something, is actually something, as opposed to ignoring it outright.

That something says something about you in two ways. Namely a reaction to me posting something or something related to the article.

The degree to which you engaged with it further and the lack of any coherent argument adds weight to such inferences.

You are a one-trick pony and act right on cue, as expected, always.

Now you aren't even saying anything. This is just arguing over BS and flooding the thread with nonsense.

 

[Biscuit1018]

I don't have an issue with fox. I don't care for fox. I wasn't the one to bring fox up or the adds. I haven't even seen the adds.
Someone asked what was going on between Trump and Fox and I simply said Fox is running anti Trump adds so obviously he is happy with that.

OK I will keep to your words only. I don't understand the logic. The Republican Party and its members are not monolithic and owe no oath of fealty to Trump.
Below you were clearly upset with the Republican rebels and with Fox?

There's clearly an agenda, and they choose to play along. What is the point of a Republican anti Trump add?
That just undermines democracy.

 

[rietrot]

OK I will keep to your words only. I don't understand the logic. The Republican Party and its members are not monolithic and owe no oath of fealty to Trump.
Below you were clearly upset with the Republican rebels and with Fox?

There's clearly an agenda, and they choose to play along. What is the point of a Republican anti Trump add?
That just undermines democracy.

Bra. If you struggle with very basic logic I cannot help you. Apply the same thing to the dems and see if you get it then.

An organisation divided cannot stand. They have a process to elect a leader. Once that is done any Republican anti Trump add is stupid, because they are undermining their own party.

I cannot dumb it down anymore.

 

[AlmightyBender]

Bra. If you struggle with very basic logic I cannot help you. Apply the same thing to the dems and see if you get it then.

An organisation divided cannot stand. They have a process to elect a leader. Once that is done any Republican anti Trump add is stupid, because they are undermining their own party.

I cannot dumb it down anymore.

Remember this the next time you criticize the ANC and it's supporters.
I would perhaps also say something about country > party but I don't think you care about that.

 

[Biscuit1018]

Bra. If you struggle with very basic logic I cannot help you. Apply the same thing to the dems and see if you get it then.

An organisation divided cannot stand. They have a process to elect a leader. Once that is done any Republican anti Trump add is stupid, because they are undermining their own party.

I cannot dumb it down anymore.

Ok with turning it around.
I have no issue with Democrats opposing Biden. Some of Bernie Bros are still against Biden (despite Bernoe withdrawing).
There have been examples in the past of vicious Democrat internal battles that make this look tame.
Its the nature of a two party system. Some people will always not be served

But you did complain about Fox being part of the agenda by taking the ad.

Moving on though

They have a process to elect a leader. Once that is done any Republican anti Trump add is stupid,

BTW - Technically they have not selected Trump yet. Its inevitable but it only happens at the convention which has not happened yet. And even once it happens, they are free to bat for the other guy.

 

[rietrot]

Remember this the next time you criticize the ANC and it's supporters.
I would perhaps also say something about country > party but I don't think you care about that.

There is a difference between a political party it's members and its supporters.

This is just next level stupid.

People not happy with the ANC should leave the ANC or change it from within. Not make political adds criticising the democratically elected leader just because their faction lost.
Go to the DA then.

I don't claim to be an ANC supporter whilst not supporting it.

 

[Techne]

Lol, speculate away. "Yawn" and "Your article is dumb" constitute great lengths. You're a funny guy. I have no will to engage you on the subject hence me posting "Yawn" - an expression of exactly how much of a schitt I gave about it. You going apoplectic was a bonus though, thanks!

Shame man, he lacks the intellect to figure out why the opinion is so terrible and he is looking towards you for help.