Speedster
Honorary Master
- Joined
- May 2, 2006
- Messages
- 21,683
What is the number then?They absolutely do not.
What is the number then?They absolutely do not.
Somehow this non-Think tank, was rated as the 9th most influential think tank in America. How can you be a influential think tank, if you are not a think tank?proof or STFU
the "think tank" you are most likely referring to fyi would be the Cato Institute which at least IS a self proclaimed think tank
Mises is purely academic with zero political links
What is the number then?
you can't control what falsehoods others spread about youSomehow this non-Think tank, was rated as the 9th most influential think tank in America. How can you be a influential think tank, if you are not a think tank?
Yet they do.Killing a child is illegal so none.
Yet they do.
More than legally, funded by the tax payerNot legally.
More than legally, funded by the tax payer
According to Guttmacher Institute 16 states have a policy that directs Medicaid to pay for all executions of the most vulnerable children.The tax payer funds killings of children legally? Mr neutral you are talking too much nonsense today.
According to Guttmacher Institute 16 states have a policy that directs Medicaid to pay for all executions of the most vulnerable children.
Comrade Bernie the pervert want blacks, Indians and Hispanics to sell drugs for a living.
This should get him some votes...
If you think England should have made peace with the Nazis, with the hindsight of what the Nazis did ... that is pretty much a far right ideological influence.you can't control what falsehoods others spread about you
what you can control is what you are, still waiting on proof of any political influence being exercised, hell while you're at it, try and prove this ridiculous notion of them being "far right"![]()
from that thread... did he just almost slip up and say he bought them?(at 17s)
InB4
![]()
Executions of children...
![]()
Whats the general age of these kids? 4-7? What form of execution? Electric chair, hangings? Care to post a source of a single case?
A procedure in which the abortionist pulls a living baby feet-first out of the womb and into the birth canal (vagina), except for the head, which the abortionist purposely keeps lodged just inside the cervix (the opening to the womb). The abortionist punctures the base of the baby’s skull with a surgical instrument, such as a long surgical scissors or a pointed hollow metal tube called a trochar. He then inserts a catheter (tube) into the wound, and removes the baby's brain with a powerful suction machine. This causes the skull to collapse, after which the abortionist completes the delivery of the now-dead baby. [\quote]
Hi neutral speedster, killing children is illegal, no democrat is trying to overturn that.