SoldierMan
Executive Member
- Joined
- Aug 3, 2019
- Messages
- 9,416
- Reaction score
- 7,377
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Good heavens, look at 11 minutes 35 seconds of gish gallop nonsense that BBSA is expecting people to watch.Another mindless YouTube without being able to use own words
BBSA's next video post said:I'm posting this video because I think the argument [X] expressed at time [Y] is well made. I think this because of the following reasons: [Z]
Good heavens, look at 11 minutes 35 seconds of gish gallop nonsense that BBSA is expecting people to watch.
Here, I'll give you a template:
Replace X, Y, and Z as you see fit.
If that is what passes for "triggered" in your mind, "soldier" boy, then yes.Wow.... triggered much Miss Scudsucker?
I eagerly await the "defense" of trump on this...
... I'm a big fan, I always watch the "mental gymnastics" section on SuperSport 2.
Trump wants to block Bolton’s book, claiming most conversations are classified
President Trump has directly weighed in on the White House review of a forthcoming book by his former national security adviser, telling his staff that he views John Bolton as “a traitor,” that everything he uttered to the departed aide about national security is classified and that he will seek to block the book’s publication, according to two people familiar with the conversations.
It's simple. If it's classified, it's not allowed to be published.
It's simple. If it's classified, it's not allowed to be published. It's quite common for people in high-ranking government positions to have their book checked by the government. Happens to spooks (spies) often. I don't see anything out of order here.
Please link me to where National Security Council minutes can be accessed by common folk such as me.
The material has already been vetted. The standard for classification is extremely high and there’s no chance someone like John Bolton would risk his career by publishing state secrets. Trump is simply and obviously trying to use executive privilege to override the first amendment to avoid incriminating details coming out.