rietrot
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2016
- Messages
- 44,510
- Reaction score
- 22,530
Sorry my bad. I read that incorrectly as if you are trying to shame the guy for dressing up like a woman.
-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Which compact crossover would you choose?
US Election 2020
- Thread starter GotToLuveIT
- Start date
- Status
Critical, yes, but discriminatory? No.
theratman
Honorary Master
I suspect you're in for disappointment.
I see Chuck Schumer is taking a step in the right direction by acknowledging that his comments were wrong.
Has Trump ever done the same for his threat against a member of US House of Representatives?
Disappointing, I expected her to go down kicking and screaming to the end
scudsucker
Executive Member
- Joined
- Oct 16, 2006
- Messages
- 9,021
- Reaction score
- 5,240
Queue rietrot calling out racism just as he recently called out transphobia.... in 3... 2... 1... ?
konfab
Honorary Master
Daily reminder we are in the best time line. 
TysonRoux
Honorary Master
I am glad BBSA is embracing transgender rights.
In Styxenhammer666 early days, before his Holocaust denial days and his current right wing ideologue days he use to crossdress on youtube and speak about drugs and his sexual fantasies of dressing up as a girl during sex.
He loves to hook onto what ever is the current edgy platform that gets him views.
Some of his videos are still up, while he was in "girl" mode.
I am glad BBSA is giving a voice to those who are diverse and choose to express their transgender fantasies.
ROLF
A whole new meaning to BBSA's infatuation.
Sideshow Bob
Honorary Master
Good that Warren dropped out. Supporters (mainly black muslims) of orange poop are unlikely to vote for woman.
Last edited:
cerebus
Honorary Master
Schumer's comments were nothing more than an echo of Kavanaugh's own comments. Why should he have apologised?
TysonRoux
Honorary Master
Senate Democrats just got a huge boost in their push for the majority
Former Montana Gov. Steve Bullock's decision to reverse course and run for the Senate this November is a massive recruiting coup for Democrats that not only makes the party competitive in that state but also improves their odds of retaking the majority this fall.
Bullock, who left office last year as a popular two-term governor, is widely regarded as the only Democrat with a credible chance of beating freshman Republican Sen. Steve Daines in a state that tends to favor Republicans at the federal level. (Bullock, who ran briefly for president in this election, had repeatedly insisted that he had no interest in the Senate. He has apparently changed his mind.)
Former Montana Gov. Steve Bullock's decision to reverse course and run for the Senate this November is a massive recruiting coup for Democrats that not only makes the party competitive in that state but also improves their odds of retaking the majority this fall.
Bullock, who left office last year as a popular two-term governor, is widely regarded as the only Democrat with a credible chance of beating freshman Republican Sen. Steve Daines in a state that tends to favor Republicans at the federal level. (Bullock, who ran briefly for president in this election, had repeatedly insisted that he had no interest in the Senate. He has apparently changed his mind.)
Nom Chompsky
High Tory
Biden will still storm most of the rest of the primaries. Crazy Bernie's supporters only aimed to appeal to 30 percent of Democrats as that would give them victory in a split field. Unfortunately, they didn't plan for the moderates coalescing around Creepy Uncle Joe! Poor scenario planning!
cerebus
Honorary Master
Yeah this is pretty much accurate. The Dems finally decided to get their act together and unify around a candidate because obviously they're all such huge socialists.
OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
This is drivel, and no one believes it - least of all conservative judges.
NarrowBandFtw
Honorary Master
in which parallel NPC universe does that constitute a threat?!?
Zuma has not paid the price for what he has done to the country
Did I just threaten the butternut?
Mr X just fahked with the wrong intelligence community, that I happen to be connected to, they will fahk him up!
now that, THAT is a threat, perhaps learn to distinguish and you will understand
OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
Damn Democrats, making Trump say impossibly stupid and irresponsible things!
Schumer said -in which parallel NPC universe does that constitute a threat?!?
Zuma has not paid the price for what he has done to the country
Did I just threaten the butternut?
Mr X just fahked with the wrong intelligence community, that I happen to be connected to, they will fahk him up!
now that, THAT is a threat, perhaps learn to distinguish and you will understand
You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price
Trump said -
... He has not paid the price yet, for what he has done to our Country.
Literally the same thing.
OrbitalDawn
Ulysses Everett McGill
Schumer said -
You have released the whirlwind, and you will pay the price
Trump said -
... He has not paid the price yet, for what he has done to our Country.
Literally the same thing.
Not to mention Kavanaugh himself, as cerebus mentioned.
Roberts Denounces Schumer for Talking About Kavanaugh the Way Kavanaugh Talked About the Senate
If Schumer’s repudiated words sounded at all familiar to you, here's the reason.
Endless hypocrisy and bad faith.
NarrowBandFtw
Honorary Master
ftfy, I'm sure you accidentally left out the bit where it becomes an actual threat and literally something completely different from what Trump has ever done
- Status