Gnarls
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,947
- Reaction score
- 1,704
Who said that you cant teach old female dogs new tricks!!!!
Now that you got that out of your system....
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Who said that you cant teach old female dogs new tricks!!!!
Not going to waste my time.Watch... the... video if you want to comment on it. If you don't then just ignore it. Come on it's not that hard, what is this the US Election 2020 For Retards thread?
Easier to cower behind an emoji and a video than to express your own views and defend them using independent thought, intelligence and make evaluations based on your own morals, ethics and beliefs.Easier to throw a tantrum.
Easier to cower behind an emoji and a video than to express your own views and defend them using independent thought, intelligence and make evaluations based on your own morals, ethics and beliefs.
Not going to waste my time.
If I see that the comment attached to the video generates an level of intelect worthy of discussion I will gladly watch it.
All I saw was an emoji that my 5yr old uses, so I assume that it is just trolling and the poster actually has no interest in discussing it or for that matter has no independent thoughts on it.
In this case I know the poster is generally capable of independent thought, so I tried to elicit a discussion to see if it is worth my time. But alas it seems my instincts that this was just a troll were right and I saved my time watching a video that the poster generally had no vested interest in other than to troll.
If I want to see what Tim Pools views are, I will go to youtube and watch them for myself. What I care about here is how people here interpret the various news articles, videos and tweets on this subject and discuss it using their own words.
This is not a USA Election Youtube Video thread.
Still being an NPC I seeStill throwing that tantrum I see.
I watch Trevor Noah outside of this forum so I ignore them.So why do people post news articles of OTHER PEOPLE"S OPINIONS, do you ever read those, there's some interesting ones.
What about all the Trevor Noah videos that are posted here? They okay?
Why is it then so difficult to ignore none Trevor Noah videos?I watch Trevor Noah outside of this forum so I ignore them.
Most people post those articles, with their views attached.
Perhaps my assumptions would be less biased if you put commentary to the video in your post, so instead of leaving me to make assumptions I could assess the point you are looking to raise?
Unless of course you are just posting the video for trolling purposes without any intention what so ever to engage in good faith discussion over the merits of what you want to achieve with the video?
Based on your NPC ROFL emoji
Or .... you can apply your own logic, intellect and critical reasoning, which I know you have and are able to use very effectively on these forums and provide a basis for discussion, instead of just trolling with emoji's like a 5 year old who found a new button.
Cool, I'll just ignore the videos in future, instead of trying to encourage an intellectual discussion on it, as supposed to some emojis.
Easier to cower behind an emoji and a video than to express your own views and defend them using independent thought, intelligence and make evaluations based on your own morals, ethics and beliefs.
No, I said so the other day.So why do people post news articles of OTHER PEOPLE"S OPINIONS, do you ever read those, there's some interesting ones.
What about all the Trevor Noah videos that are posted here? They okay?
And what? Create an echo chamber for you? LolBetter than your incessant bleating about a post you could just ignore oh Trigglypuff.
And what? Create an echo chamber for you? Lol
That is a pure partisan lie.If I want to see what Tim Pools views are, I will go to youtube and watch them for myself. What I care about here is how people here interpret the various news articles, videos and tweets on this subject and discuss it using their own words.
This is not a USA Election Youtube Video thread.
Name dropping not working for Sessions.
Trump campaign sends letter to Sessions demanding he stop invoking Trump
President Donald Trump's campaign has sent a letter to Jeff Sessions demanding the former attorney general stop using Trump's name in his campaign materials for his US Senate bid.
"We only assume your campaign is doing this to confuse President Trump's loyal supporters in Alabama into believing the President supports your candidacy in the upcoming primary run-off election. Nothing could be further from the truth," wrote Michael Glassner, chief operating officer of the Trump campaign, to Sessions in the letter obtained by CNN and first reported by The New York Times.
Trump has long held a grudge against his former attorney general, whose recusal from the Russia investigation in early 2017 led to the appointment of special counsel Robert Mueller.
Last month, Trump endorsed Tommy Tuberville, Sessions' rival in the GOP primary runoff for Alabama's US Senate seat. Tuberville and Sessions are both vying to take on Democratic Sen. Doug Jones in the fall, and Republicans view the race as one of their most promising pickup opportunities in the Senate. That runoff had been scheduled for Tuesday but was postponed until July due to the coronavirus outbreak.
A person familiar with the matter said Trump didn't direct the campaign to send the aforementioned letter, but aides who are aware of his dislike for his former attorney general knew he wouldn't approve of Sessions touting his ties to Trump.
The campaign has sent similar letters like this before, though Sessions was obviously a priority given the President's feelings.
Sessions has campaigned as someone who would loyally serve the President if he won back his old Senate seat. Trump, however, has never moved past the sense of betrayal he felt over Sessions' recusal.
However, Trump waited until after the results of the Alabama GOP primary vote in early March forced Tuberville and Sessions into a runoff to weigh into the race; neither candidate topped the 50% needed to win the nomination outright.