Gnarls
Expert Member
- Joined
- May 20, 2008
- Messages
- 4,947
- Reaction score
- 1,704
^I'm guessing posts like this are fine from the group that cry for thread civility.
Maybe they're privy to data you aren't?
Really? Did you read it?Nobody said they were.
They just aren't current.
KING: At White House briefings, you and Dr. Deborah Birx have talked about an interesting scenario, where American scientists are able to gather data about cases all across this country, and then policymakers can tailor their response based on local characteristics like, how bad is it here? Do you have the data you need now to tell different areas of the country they should be doing different things?
FAUCI: Well, what you just mentioned is what I was referring to a moment ago. We are quickly getting to the point where we will be able to get that data. But you are correct, to be honest. We don't have all that data now uniformly throughout the country to make those determinations. But that's a major primary goal that we have right now is to get those data because you have to make informed decisions, and your decisions are informed by the information you have. And that's where the data comes in.
Maybe they're privy to data you aren't?