US Election 2020

Status
Not open for further replies.
Emjay said:
Just like how you were talking about me when I wasn't active in this thread for months, and had someone from this forum alert me on another platform about the fact?

:X3: :ROFL:
Click to expand...

You mean that time that you, rietrot and co were messaging each other on twitter to coordinate your RBPs of us lefties here?
 
Gnarls said:
Moar deflection. C'mon Greg, you can do better than...wait maybe you can't.
Click to expand...

The Logan act deflection has been asked and answered here... But maybe it was you, rather than Em I was thinking of when I posted this for her:

www.theatlantic.com

To Trump, ‘Complete and Total Exoneration’ Is Always Right Around the Corner

The president and his supporters continue to fixate on the Russia investigation, perpetually expecting redemption.
www.theatlantic.com www.theatlantic.com

The interesting question is why the Trumpist right remains fixated on its Russia-investigation revisionism. Why not simply let it go—let the FBI live with the unflattering inspector-general reports about its handling of Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act matters, the criticisms of Comey and former Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, and the decapitation of its leadership during that period? Why the need to pretend Flynn is innocent—which he manifestly is not? Why the need to pretend some great reckoning is on the horizon—a reckoning that isn’t coming, because the investigation was lawful? Why the need, long past the time when anyone is talking about Donald Trump Jr.’s ill-fated meeting with a Russian lawyer in Trump Tower, to continually insist that there was no Russia matter to investigate and that it was all some kind of conspiracy—when the Russia questions were very real and the conspiracy nonexistent?
Click to expand...
 
greg0205 said:
You mean that time that you, rietrot and co were messaging each other on twitter to coordinate your RBPs of us lefties here?
Click to expand...

1589281415799.png

Now you are posting about how you think we talk about you on another platform?

Rent free, hey Greg?
 
Emjay said:
And this does not address the question I asked. How is the Flynn case material when the FBI were going to drop the case, but Strzok kept it open using the Logan Act? You cannot answer this because the answer is one you cannot believe.
Click to expand...

It's a nothingburger, just like all the 1,000 strands of Qanon-fuelled rabbit-trails you've followed that eventually petered into nothing. The central premise of Barr's rationale for dropping the investigation is based on a complete twisting of the words of the Justice Department's case against Flynn, according to the very people who wrote those cases.

This also does not address any of the other issues I posted over the weekend, but I really am bored with this and this is pointless. You also didn't mention which Q conspiracy theories / talking points I have been discussing. The case has been dropped, so it is what it is. I am sorry this is happening to you.
Click to expand...

The theory that Peter Strzok (and his lover) are somehow instrumental in the deep state conspiracy to undermine Trump's presidency is central to Qanon.


greg0205 said:
You mean that time that you, rietrot and co were messaging each other on twitter to coordinate your RBPs of us lefties here?
Click to expand...

Did that happen?
 
cerebus said:
It's a nothingburger, just like all the 1,000 strands of Qanon-fuelled rabbit-trails you've followed that eventually petered into nothing. The central premise of Barr's rationale for dropping the investigation is based on a complete twisting of the words of the Justice Department's case against Flynn, according to the very people who wrote those cases.



The theory that Peter Strzok (and his lover) are somehow instrumental in the deep state conspiracy to undermine Trump's presidency is central to Qanon.




Did that happen?
Click to expand...

Barr dropped the case because of some Qanon theories which twisted the words of the DOJ? 1000s of Q trails I have followed? Really? Is this your proof?

I am not saying Peter Strzok is deep state. Care to point out where I posted that, cerebus? His actions however were not great. And there is actual proof of this and not just some pie in the sky theory. I actually believe Strzok thought he was acting in the best interests of the USA. But you know the road to hell.. yada yada.

I don't watch or read any Q-anon content. But if it makes you feel better to think I did, knock yourself out. You really don't care about the facts any way.

One thing that does interest me is how interested you guys are in Q-Anon and even know their content to post videos to try and use as proof for some argument. I kind of feel pity for you cerebus.

cerebus said:
Did that happen?
Click to expand...

Yes, it did. The old man was sad because I wasn't around so he drops my name into some arb post even though I had not been active for months, someone let me know via Twitter by dropping a link to the post, and I responded in kind. It's pretty sad.
 
Last edited:
[/URL]

Key takeaway: Biden will also take a hard line on China as well as be sceptical of free trade. Democrats finally realising they need to adopt a more "patriotic" agenda. This is good.

He and co-author Jennifer Harris (another Obama veteran) argue for a fundamental shift away from what they call the “neoliberal” agenda of recent presidents. “Policymakers must move beyond the received wisdom that every trade deal is a good trade deal and that more trade is always the answer,” they write. A “postneoliberal” agenda would promote industrial policy (large public investments in green energy and other climate-friendly technologies as well as funding to match China’s support for tech). It would include the reshoring of strategic manufacturing capabilities, “a laser focus on what improves wages and creates high-paying jobs in the United States,” and aggressive campaigns against firms taking advantage of low-corporate-tax havens like Switzerland and Ireland.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
cerebus said:
It's a nothingburger, just like all the 1,000 strands of Qanon-fuelled rabbit-trails you've followed that eventually petered into nothing. The central premise of Barr's rationale for dropping the investigation is based on a complete twisting of the words of the Justice Department's case against Flynn, according to the very people who wrote those cases.



The theory that Peter Strzok (and his lover) are somehow instrumental in the deep state conspiracy to undermine Trump's presidency is central to Qanon.




Did that happen?
Click to expand...

Who knows what was discussed off-forum... But there were certainly messages off-forum.

Screenshot 2020-05-12 at 13.29.46.png

Screenshot 2020-05-12 at 13.29.50.png
 
Emjay said:
Pity the Democrats don't take a hard line against sexual assault allegations when it does not suit their political agenda.
Click to expand...

Twenty five women have accused Donnie. Twenty five.

Time for Republicans to take a hard line against sexual assault allegations yet, Em?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X