In this case it is a win for Megan Kelly as she gets all the money without having to do the work.
Yeah, which is cold comfort. Which network (besides Fox) would take a serious look at her after this?
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
In this case it is a win for Megan Kelly as she gets all the money without having to do the work.
It's a stupid concept. It is not racist. Soft people like you who conflate everything are the issue.
It's not deemed to be racist, it is racist. You can't profess to be ignorant of the history and implications of blackface.
If your little white boy wanted to blacken up his face, I hope you, a socially aware adult, would explain why it's inappropriate and it might hurt the feelings of the black children in his classroom. Children can do that stuff. My little boy once told a black child in our car that he thinks black people are disgusting, it caused an enormous offense and I was mortified. But it was a good opportunity for a conversation.
When Megyn Kelly, a noted race baiting 'journalist' who is also an adult who can damn well take responsibility for her own actions, feigns ignorance over the legacy of blackface, you'll forgive me for not rushing to her defense.

Why do you lot assume freedom of speech is freedom from the consequences of said speech? - If she was being put in jail for expressing her opinion then you might have a point but using a platform that her employer provides her doesn't give her freedom to say any random stuff that comes into her head without consequences.And losing a job over expression of an opinion is the antithesis of freedom of speech.
Why do you lot assume freedom of speech is freedom from the consequences of said speech?
Why do you lot assume freedom of speech is freedom from the consequences of said speech? - If she was being put in jail for expressing her opinion then you might have a point but using a platform that her employer provides her doesn't give her freedom to say any random stuff that comes into her head without consequences.
Cool, so at the office Halloween party this year you're going as Stevie Wonder?
When people cannot freely and openly express opinions, then ideas are shut out, and those that are the loudest (and the ones that can wield the wooden spoon) are the only ones that are heard, and the ones that are adopted because there are no balanced views.
I wouldn't paint my face. I would use a mask.
If she gets ask her opinion on a panel discussion she should be allowed to voice any opinion no matter how racist without consequence. What is the point of panel discussions if it is just a circlejerk.Why do you lot assume freedom of speech is freedom from the consequences of said speech? - If she was being put in jail for expressing her opinion then you might have a point but using a platform that her employer provides her doesn't give her freedom to say any random stuff that comes into her head without consequences.
Why wouldn't you paint your face?
I actually agree that she shouldn't have been fired, the idea that certain news station only having people with prescribed viewpoints is just silly. I do not however think that her getting fired for saying it is an infringement on her freedom of speech.If she gets ask her opinion on a panel discussion she should be allowed to voice any opinion no matter how racist without consequence. What is the point of panel discussions if it is just a circlejerk.
Because I wouldn't want paint on my face as it is impractical for a party, and bad for the skin.
This line of questioning is stupid and completely irrelevant.
Wow you just described the average Fox News segment.
No, thats heritage and cultureSo when the sons go to the maintain to become men, they are painted white. That is racist too then right?
View attachment 569391
Really? Not afraid of your colleagues taking offense to the fact that you look like a minstrel show? I would expect to be at least cautioned, maybe even fired, for pulling that **** in the office.
It's 100% relevant and you know it.
Policing people's opinions is a free speech violation.I actually agree that she shouldn't have been fired, the idea that certain news station only having people with prescribed viewpoints is just silly. I do not however think that her getting fired for saying it is an infringement on her freedom of speech.
Fired for wearing a mask?
Oh...ooops.Perfect example of a NPC script running.
The whole f***ing point is that speech should not have any consequences... something that the lefties just don't get.
The police had nothing to do with it - she is a public face of that network, if the network feels that what she said might affect revenue or sponsors they have every right to fire her - I don't think they should but it is their right and she is still welcome to hold that position regardless of whether she has that job or not.Policing people's opinions is a free speech violation.
Fired for painting my face black. Or... at least strongly cautioned. At last year's Halloween party the CEO came dressed as someone that some people interpreted to be Harvey Weinstein and it caused a huge ****storm.
Oh...ooops.
That's a bit myopic.
Words do have consequences, whether you think they should or not.
I give you the major playwrights of the last thousand years, the crafters of the Declaration of Independence, the tyrants and demagogues and traitors and orators and provocateurs of the world - all of them.