US politics general thread

[rietrot]

You still haven't presented any evidence whatsoever to place doubt on her credibility

Lol how is credibility even an issue? She is a parrot that just repeats what she thinks she should. This time she got a bit over exited with the "Russia bad" narrative.
How much credibility does a parrot need?

 

[cerebus]

Lol how is credibility even an issue? She is a parrot that just repeats what she thinks she should. This time she got a bit over exited with the "Russia bad" narrative.
How much credibility does a parrot need?

She didn't sound very parrot-like when she bitch-slapped Kudlow for throwing her under a train.

 

[C4Cat]

Nor have you to the contrary, oh snap.

I'm not the one who made claims about her credibility, that was you...

Lol how is credibility even an issue? She is a parrot that just repeats what she thinks she should. This time she got a bit over exited with the "Russia bad" narrative.
How much credibility does a parrot need?

NarrowBandFtw was the one going on about how she has no credibility whatsoever. I just asked why he thought that, I figured there must be stuff about her I didn't know and he would tell me about something she did, to lose credibility in his eyes but he actually has no answer. As usual, he just decided so for no reason whatsoever, just because.

 

[Unhappy1]

I wonder if she knows, she just needs to praise glorious Russia and her credibility will be restored?

 

[rietrot]

I wonder if she knows, she just needs to praise glorious Russia and her credibility will be restored?

Yeah if you think not warmongering = praising Russia.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

I wonder if she knows, she just needs to praise glorious Russia and her credibility will be restored?

In Narrowband's eyes, yes

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

I wonder if she knows, she just needs to praise glorious Russia and her credibility will be restored?

In Narrowband's eyes, yes

see below:

Yeah if you think not warmongering = praising Russia.

You two have your heads quite far up your rear if you cannot see how a warmongering parrot is dangerous to the world when it is meant to be the world's strongest military's representative to the world body that espouses world peace.

I do enjoy the irony in how your are effectively supporting Trump's warmongering by defending her however, please do continue.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

see below:


You two have your heads quite far up your rear if you cannot see how a warmongering parrot is dangerous to the world when it is meant to be the world's strongest military's representative to the world body that espouses world peace.

I do enjoy the irony in how your are effectively supporting Trump's warmongering by defending her however, please do continue.

Who here is defending her?

Seems like you have your head so far up Putin's bot that you are sight is muddied

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

NarrowBandFtw was the one going on about how she has no credibility whatsoever. I just asked why he thought that, I figured there must be stuff about her I didn't know and he would tell me about something she did, to lose credibility in his eyes but he actually has no answer. As usual, he just decided so for no reason whatsoever, just because.

Are you high?!? I already told you why I hold that opinion of her:

If you read properly you'd see the narrative didn't change in the least, I said she has no credibility as she has no moral compass.

Singing a morally incorrect US agenda like a canary = no moral compass.
Lying about sanctions = no moral compass.

You keep harping on about evidence though as if you dismiss my reasoning, big surprise, hence there is no hope for you to see the light. Perhaps ask someone within your echo chamber rather, someone who happens to be the first who cast doubt on her credibility:

You know things are ****ed up when Nikki Haley is one of the few people in your administration that still has some semblance of competence.

 

[cerebus]

I do enjoy the irony in how your are effectively supporting Trump's warmongering by defending her however

Not defending anything, just suggesting that she didn't miscommunicate the sanctions that were going to be put in place. Although, sanctions !=warmongering.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

Who here is defending her?

Let's see: you are, unhappy is and C4Cat is

Throwing red herrings around about her position on Russia having any effect on my, or others', perception of her = defending her
Asking for, and ignoring, evidence of her flaws = defending her

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

Not defending anything, just suggesting that she didn't miscommunicate the sanctions that were going to be put in place. Although, sanctions !=warmongering.

I don't doubt that it's possible, even likely, that additional sanctions were going to be put in place. We just have no way of knowing whether she was given the official mandate to communicate that decision when she did. It's a case of he-said-she-said and we're stuck with choosing who to believe.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

Let's see: you are, unhappy is and C4Cat is

Throwing red herrings around about her position on Russia having any effect on my, or others', perception of her = defending her
Asking for, and ignoring, evidence of her flaws = defending her

As I said, your sight is exceedingly muddied.

We are laughing at the "best people" that your master's poodle keeps hiring and firing. And the fact that he doesn't know wtf is going on.

None of the people you mentioned above actually like Haley in the slightest. If you could see, you would know that.

 

[rietrot]

We are laughing at the "best people" that your master's poodle keeps hiring and firing. And the fact that he doesn't know wtf is going on.

It is 4D underwater chess. You only have a very limited view, so maybe it is you who doesn't know wtf is going on. Or are you now going to argue you understand the inner-workings of the US government better than the president of that country.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

It is 4D underwater chess. You only have a very limited view, so maybe it is you who doesn't know wtf is going on. Or are you now going to argue you understand the inner-workings of the US government better than the president of that country.

Cool story bro.

 

[NarrowBandFtw]

We are laughing at the "best people" that your master's poodle keeps hiring and firing. And the fact that he doesn't know wtf is going on.

Yet more red herring, you must be quite the seafood lover.

 

[Hamish McPanji]

Yet more red herring, you must be quite the seafood lover.

/Yawns

 

[RanzB]

Perhaps ask someone within your echo chamber rather, someone who happens to be the first who cast doubt on her credibility:

Is there any concept on which you have a firm grasp? Obviously the idea of what an echo chamber is evades you.

Not defending anything, just suggesting that she didn't miscommunicate the sanctions that were going to be put in place. Although, sanctions !=warmongering.

Something else that seems to be going over his head. Not sure why though, this isn't a difficult thing to understand.

 

[rietrot]

Cool story bro.

/Yawns

Why even bother. You know if you have any kind of an argument that you don't have to say stupid shît like this just to get the last word in. This is just weak. If you're going to troll at least be funny or a grammar Nazi.

 

[Aquila ka Hecate]

I'm hearing all of Narrow's posts in a Chekhov voice (Pavel, not Anton).

It's making for an amusing Friday.