US politics general thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
235749e43c7357e90a9a44300e2b23d4.jpg

:crylaugh:
 
Donald Trump falsely claims that the Queen inspected the Guard of Honour for the first time in 70 years because of his visit

Now, in a statement to the press on Tuesday, Trump wrongly stated that the honour bestowed upon him was one that had not been carried out for decades - which is untrue.

He said: "We met with the queen, who is absolutely a terrific person, where she reviewed her Honour Guard for the first time in 70 years, they tell me. We walked in front of the Honour Guard and that was very inspiring to see and be with her. And I think the relationship, I can truly say is a good one. But she was very, very inspiring indeed."

The Queen actually inspects her Honour Guard many times a year and does so for important events such as visiting heads of state.

Of the president’s claims, royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams told The Independent: “This is obviously total fiction.

More lies from President Womp Womp. Let's see how those who love fellating this liar defend this.
 
Two reasons for posting this... One, she was spectacular. Two, folk will be triggered, and you know the folk I mean.
Who would be triggered by an entirely discredited puppet like this retard?!? If you're willing to put up with such drivel more power to you. But you'd sooner be selling ice to Eskimos than convincing anyone with a triple digit IQ that Maddow can ever be "spectacular" :crylaugh:
 
Who would be triggered by an entirely discredited puppet like this retard?!? If you're willing to put up with such drivel more power to you. But you'd sooner be selling ice to Eskimos than convincing anyone with a triple digit IQ that Maddow can ever be "spectacular" :crylaugh:

And the first person to respond is...



Womp womp.
 
Who would be triggered by an entirely discredited puppet like this retard?!? If you're willing to put up with such drivel more power to you. But you'd sooner be selling ice to Eskimos than convincing anyone with a triple digit IQ that Maddow can ever be "spectacular" :crylaugh:

Oh Maddow, weird because it sounded like you were talking about Trump.
 
Oh Maddow, weird because it sounded like you were talking about Trump.

Weird how the only things these 'non-Trumpites' respond to is other people, never all the embarassing, moronic things that EmPeRoR MaGa says and does.
 
Weird how the only things these 'non-Trumpites' respond to is other people, never all the embarassing, moronic things that EmPeRoR MaGa says and does.

You find it weird that a non-Trump-fan would not obsess about what he says all the time? Seems quite logical to me ...
 
You find it weird that a non-Trump-fan would not obsess about what he says all the time? Seems quite logical to me ...

Yeah, 'weird' how a 'non-Trump-fan' refuses to criticise anything about Trump :D so 'weird' :crylaugh:
 
Yeah, 'weird' how a 'non-Trump-fan' refuses to criticise anything about Trump :D so 'weird' :crylaugh:
Randhir logic: if you don't criticize something it means you love it, there's zero chance that you just don't care enough to give it much thought

Tell me good sir, why don't you regularly criticize the techniques used by hand embroiders? Ha! You are clearly a fan of embroidery!
 
Randhir logic: if you don't criticize something it means you love it, there's zero chance that you just don't care enough to give it much thought

So, now you're defending your own thoughtless responses that unquestioningly defend Trump's behavior?
 
It's only hard if you try too hard purposefully too misrepresent things.
I suggest you stop reading/watching CNN. That might make things easier.
Your posts remind me of the following excerpt from Hannah Arendt's 1951 book - "The origins of totalitarianism". In which he describes the rise of Hitler and Stalin.
b7536a0eaab2599a7df72acb204e8f71.jpg
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X