US politics general thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
In today's funny news, famed conservative intellectual and "journalist" Ben Shapiro wrote propaganda for Paul Manafort's pro-Russian stooge clients in Ukraine. :laugh:
You might want to read the actual article that you so confidently label "propaganda". Painful as reading Breitbart may be, it is quite a succinct article that by and large lists verifiable fact, not quite sure how that somehow translates into whatever bullshyte The Daily Beast wanted you to believe:
https://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2012/10/29/clinton-ukraine-tymoshenko-anti-semitism/
 
Of course there *is* proof that he’s a partisan hack who went after Clinton with 20 year old allegations remarkably similar to the one he’s facing now, lied to Congress under oath and was in possession of stolen Dem emails but, you know, whatever.
Then go an convince everyone and their dog waging an OBVIOUS smear campaign against him to stick to THAT story rather than the more juicy one they cannot prove.

but, you know, whatever
 
Then go an convince everyone and their dog waging an OBVIOUS smear campaign against him to stick to THAT story rather than the more juicy one they cannot prove.

but, you know, whatever

She’s credible. Y’all MAGAtoons have nothing to spin today. SAD
 
She’s credible
In what universe? Safe-space-inious? :ROFL:

Some random woman with a hazy recollection and sweet f-all more than some notes makes allegations against a judge who has reached the pinnacle of his profession and the peanut gallery is jizzing their pants and lining up to call her "credible"?!? What a laugh.

While I have no reason to doubt her credibility other than the impeccable timing of this 30 year old allegation, you have absolutely nothing to prove she's credible.
 
In what universe? Safe-space-inious? :ROFL:

Some random woman with a hazy recollection and sweet f-all more than some notes makes allegations against a judge who has reached the pinnacle of his profession and the peanut gallery is jizzing their pants and lining up to call her "credible"?!? What a laugh.

While I have no reason to doubt her credibility other than the impeccable timing of this 30 year old allegation, you have absolutely nothing to prove she's credible.

Other than, you know, she told her husband and a counselor about it in 2012 when, you know, Obama was POTUS and Donnie Treason had a reality show.
She also went to a lawyer in June this year before, you know, Kav’s nomination was even a thing...

But I guess you’ll do you. By which I mean jump in head first and swinging for folk like Donnie and Roy and Brett... ‘tho I’m sure you managed the right take that one time... for Harvey... ‘cos he’s a Democrat. Amirite?

EDIT: PS. Remember the 65 women who signed the letter for Brett... Yeah, that's down to two today.
 
jump in head first and swinging for folk like Donnie and Roy and Brett... ‘tho I’m sure you managed the right take that one time... for Harvey... ‘cos he’s a Democrat. Amirite?
Tell me again about what a great hero the warmongering McCain was, I like your fairy tales, makes me less cynical about the world.
 
PS. Remember the 65 women who signed the letter for Brett... Yeah, that's down to two today.
Yeah like I said: court of public opinion. Popularity contests prove only what's popular, not what is true.

Zuma won every vote of no confidence and impeachment ever instigated against him, must mean he's innocent ... :unsure:
 
Deflection? You mean like you bringing up "donnie", "roy" and "harvey"?

Do you even own a mirror? Or is that unnecessary in the darkness of your echo chamber?

If you'd like to go back through all the Trump threads to point to *any* time you didn't hop in with a "smear campaign" and "random woman with a hazy recollection" take on Kav, Woywoy or pu**ygrabber, I'll be happy to correct that statement...

'Till then, I'll wait here shall I?
 
Yeah like I said: court of public opinion. Popularity contests prove only what's popular, not what is true.

Zuma won every vote of no confidence and impeachment ever instigated against him, must mean he's innocent ... :unsure:

Did you stretch before you made that huge reach?
 
It's only a reach if your IQ trends towards the room temperature. No stretching required for normal, rational, even slightly objective people.

This post exhibits the saddest lack of self-awareness I've seen in all my years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X