-
Join the MyBroadband community
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
-
Question of the Day: Are you keeping your Prime subscription?
Vodacom ordered to stop BMW competition
- Thread starter rpm
- Start date
You should at the very least consider that the information you are posting is erroneous at the source, IOW the date "2007-02-13" that you are propagating & attaching to "Complaint Number: 0213", is incorrect - and obviously so when one actually reads the .pdf document that you posted a link to.
Furthermore, in that specific ruling, Cointel alleges some sort of relationship with Vodacom, Cointel alleges that Cointel was acting for and on behalf of Vodacom, however such a relationship with Vodacom appears not to have been investigated - I expect due to its irrelevance since Cointel sent the SMS message + 9 to an alleged telemetry device, and Cointel was the WASP responsible and consequently held responsible, all of Cointel's statements in that ruling regarding Vodacom are unproven and irrelevant as far as the actual ruling is concerned.
Use the RBP functionality, TIA.
Skeptik
Banned
What are you whining about my young fellow?
Oh and RTFP.
So to stick to the subject and avoid the derailment attempt, I would just say that
... this ruling (updated in Feb 2007) reveals how this network uses WASPA members to deflect responsibility for any evil doings (credible deniability as the CIA would call it). Since the network is not a member itself, it can claim clean hands. Well it could since WASPA are not as naive as I first thought and have seen through it.
[BTW I used the RBP but it was ignored]
Unless I'm mistaken, you are solely responsible for the thread derailment so far by trying to throw in some spurious and as yet unproven [in your posts as well as in the WASPA ruling you linked to] association between Cointel and Vodacom - which has nothing to do with this thread, ergo the derailment which you are responsible for.
Post something that proves your case or at least something on topic.
Skeptik
Banned
Yes, you are mistaken. I've nothing further to add because I've decided to limit my responses to baiting.
Oh, I see. You also got the threatening / condescending / insulting PM's? Already received mine before your post.
Guess I only get one PI (private insult) per day. 
Ah so you did get them. Saddens me a bit as I thought he thought I was special
Sorry to burst your bubble.
Seems to be a trend then, if you are shown to be incorrect on the forum, you rip with the PI's or run to Hello Peter.