South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Yus, this this looks hideous. Apart from the performance specs it looks crap![]()
You mean 0.3 seconds... but you almost got it right.
(http://www.audicts.com/2012-audi-rs3-specs -> 0-100: 4.6)
(http://www.autoguide.com/manufacturer/audi/2012-audi-s5-review-video-1584.html -> 0-100: 4.9)
+e^22
RS5 is more practical![]()
The RS3 is R550k, the S5 is R660k. Normal A5 3.2 is around the same price as the RS3 and is 2 seconds closer.
But if price is not an option why not buy the R8 V10.
I don't think many RS3's will make it to the road as it'll be at almost S5 prices and why would anyone buy an ugly RS3 when you can get an S5.
Lol I'm used to people that make excuses, heard it all tbh, anything from altitude to bigger wheels to the sub woofer in the boot.
And run a better time, 15.2 is laughable when S3s/Gti with similar mods are doing low to mid 13s.
LOL ...
For a second I thought you were being serious!
Good one![]()
15.2 is laughable when S3s/Gti with similar mods are doing low to mid 13s.
I agree with Dolby, you're not going to get 13s on an ST, T5, or a gti5 without some serious mods. Low 14s is much more likely when looking at software, downpipe & exhaust