'We can smell a 70% majority'

[semaphore]

You probably meant accused fraudster?

Was he not on trial for rape? perhaps suspect is a better word.

 

[Kloofvreter]

No not that. You tax from your bussiness and pay slip.

That means if you're unemployed you can't vote. Unfair.

Was he not on trial for rape? perhaps suspect is a better word.

You forgot to add that he was an accused rapist acquitted of the charge.

 

[Mila]

Democracy is also not fair but hell we faught for it.

 

[semaphore]

That means if you're unemployed you can't vote. Unfair.



You forgot to add that he was an accused rapist acquitted of the charge.

acquitted perhaps, but everyone knows is was actually guilty

 

[Kloofvreter]

acquitted perhaps, but everyone knows is was actually guilty

No it's obvious he wasn't. This is getting old. The accuser is a skank who have cried rape before, and the accused then was also found not guilty. People like to label Zuma a rapist because it evokes more hate and emotion than calling him a fraudster.

No, I don't like him because he is uneducated and the howling masses like him because he just seems to shrug off controversy.

 

[R13...]

acquitted perhaps, but everyone knows is was actually guilty

Only you know/think he is guilty.
Every other sane minded person who followed the trial could never conclude he raped that woman. He is guilty of saying some ridiculous things in his own defence yes, but not guilty of rape.

 

[semaphore]

Only you know/think he is guilty.
Every other sane minded person who followed the trial could never conclude he raped that woman. He is guilty of saying some ridiculous things in his own defence yes, but not guilty of rape.

He is guilty, he is a rapist pig the women might have been a skank, but skanks still get raped, the judge was paid off..

 

[Kloofvreter]

Only you know/think he is guilty.
Every other sane minded person who followed the trial could never conclude he raped that woman. He is guilty of saying some ridiculous things in his own defence yes, but not guilty of rape.

+1

He is guilty, he is a rapist pig the women might have been a skank, but skanks still get raped, the judge was paid off..

-1

 

[R13...]

He is guilty, he is a rapist pig the women might have been a skank, but skanks still get raped, the judge was paid off..

I suspect by replacing a letter with another in the bolded parts may be an accurate description of who you are...

 

[semaphore]

+1



-1

oh noes you gave me a -1 *cries*


oh larry *snap* you are just so quick ! *winks*

 

[grayston]

No it's obvious he wasn't. This is getting old. The accuser is a skank who have cried rape before, and the accused then was also found not guilty.

She may be a skank. Or she may have been raped before. A non-guilty verdict doesn't mean rape didn't occur - it just means it couldn't be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

Even if she was in the habit of sleeping with the 60+ years old friends of her deceased father, there's no need to draw the conclusion that she necessarily wanted to be gooped in by Zuma.

 

[grayston]

Only you know/think he is guilty.
Every other sane minded person who followed the trial could never conclude he raped that woman.

Apart from the non-guilty verdict (as pointed out, that only means that rape could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt), which bit convinced you that it was consensual sex and not rape?

 

[semaphore]

Apart from the non-guilty verdict (as pointed out, that only means that rape could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt), which bit convinced you that it was consensual sex and not rape?

i guess it must me that when zuma said the women was wearing a dress, and that means she wanted to sleep with him.

Hold on guys there is a girl wearing a dress in my office, need to practice the zulu ways.

 

[JungleBoy]

Apart from the non-guilty verdict (as pointed out, that only means that rape could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt), which bit convinced you that it was consensual sex and not rape?

1. That there were cops outside the door and she did not even call for help.
2. Zuma's daughter was in the room next door and she did not call for help.
3. She had falsely accused at least 4 people (including a pastor) of rape before.
4. Sent an SMS to a friend but it slipped her mind to inform the friend that she had been raped.

 

[R13...]

Apart from the non-guilty verdict (as pointed out, that only means that rape could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt), which bit convinced you that it was consensual sex and not rape?

for one, the fact that the woman has accused 2 other people of a similar offence under similar circumstances. if anything it is entrapment.

 

[RetroBok]

Me too. I do not like him to begin with.But i guess that great granny of mine travelling over the drakensberge ( kaalvoet ) is talking to me saying, you are not going anywhere make the best of the situation. How bad can he be we had a Verwoerd. What will happen to me if this becomes a Zim i'll flee to the UK like they did.

Oh the irony

 

[milomak]

Well i surely hope he does a good job, the life blood and economic balance is in his hands. But employee people for the ministerial positions with the proper credentials. Dont put a person with a sociology degree in the telecommunications position. And a health minister with a art degree

Strange how the Trevor Manuel you want to be kept on would not have met your criteria.

Also in the recent past the US and UK had the equivalent health ministers who were not doctors or medically trained by profession.

 

[semaphore]

Strange how the Trevor Manuel you want to be kept on would not have met your criteria.

Also in the recent past the US and UK had the equivalent health ministers who were not doctors or medically trained by profession.

I have nothing against trevor manual, but if you read the iol/news 24 post they might get rid of him

i am refering to the telecoms minister, transport, health etc.. thou the current health minister is fine, but if they keep manto as telecoms its just casaburi all over again.

Well the US can do what they want a particular person should be educated in the field they are administering. Its just a logical thing to do.

 

[milomak]

So you say that you want a health minister with a health background and then proceed to endorse Barbara Hogan?

 

[semaphore]

So you say that you want a health minister with a health background and then proceed to endorse Barbara Hogan?

I want a health minister that at least understands the matters at hand, yes i am contradicting myself so i retract my statement, but at least she doesnt go around telling peopel to fking eat beetroot, and watever else that idiot did. Face it, the people that where or currently are in the positions are totally useless except the minor few.