We will be a player in the telecoms space, says DoC

I think I speak for all when I say: *Groan*

Specifically this part makes me nervous:
He added that state-owned companies are central in delivering wholesale broadband networks.
 
They are not a player, they are an obstruction.
They are not a helper, they are a stumbling block.
The sooner the government gets out of telecoms and appoints a strong, independent regulator, the better!
 
Start off by forcing property developers to install broadband as part of new developments as a standard. Ozzies have been doing it for a while:

http://ozftth.blogspot.com/2010/03/superfast-broadband-for-new.html

Precisely, use legal etc frameworks and targeted subsidies to foster the environment rather. This would be way more beneficial and allow the entire process to function way more efficiently by using government to set the framework while allowing private companies to innovate and compete.

Two big steps - LLU and the spectrum allocation would be a HUGE step in the right direction. Worry about the rest after that DoC!

I have said it a few times here, but really setting up something like LLU and using policy and legal frameworks to ensure ISP/operators don't cherry pick is really easy. Define metro, urban and rural - maybe with subdivisions for affluent and developmental areas (so urban townships get their fair share). Then define LLU by a split between the defined areas. Per port delivered in one area x ports must be available in other defined area groups. The same goes for wireless access, if you want to put up LTE in Sandton you need to have 5 times the coverage in rural, developmental areas for example.

This would mean the complexity, costs and other problems associated with running a Telco will not fall under the DoC, rather creating the right environment to allow them to flourish while delivering much needed broadband to our citizens in every corner of the country. Honestly is is really simple from the DoC policy and strategy perspective, why they want to keep taking on the difficult side for any reason other than cronyism I can't see.
 
Precisely, use legal etc frameworks and targeted subsidies to foster the environment rather. This would be way more beneficial and allow the entire process to function way more efficiently by using government to set the framework while allowing private companies to innovate and compete.

Two big steps - LLU and the spectrum allocation would be a HUGE step in the right direction. Worry about the rest after that DoC!

I have said it a few times here, but really setting up something like LLU and using policy and legal frameworks to ensure ISP/operators don't cherry pick is really easy. Define metro, urban and rural - maybe with subdivisions for affluent and developmental areas (so urban townships get their fair share). Then define LLU by a split between the defined areas. Per port delivered in one area x ports must be available in other defined area groups. The same goes for wireless access, if you want to put up LTE in Sandton you need to have 5 times the coverage in rural, developmental areas for example.

This would mean the complexity, costs and other problems associated with running a Telco will not fall under the DoC, rather creating the right environment to allow them to flourish while delivering much needed broadband to our citizens in every corner of the country. Honestly is is really simple from the DoC policy and strategy perspective, why they want to keep taking on the difficult side for any reason other than cronyism I can't see.

I totally agree with the principle and the points you're raising. I do however think that we should forget about the copper- LLU in it's current copper obsessed format will be the Wi-Max of fixed line access, unbundle the access sleeves and conduits and let's go fibre (like the rest of the sane world seems to be going)
 
Munzhelele highlighted that they will be particularly active in areas where there are market failures. “That is a very, very strong message we are sending,” said Munzhelele.

He added that state-owned companies are central in delivering wholesale broadband networks. It is assumed that Munzhelele is referring to companies such as Sentech, Broadband Infraco, and potentially Telkom.

isn't it because they've been particularly active in said companies that we have the market failures?
 
I totally agree with the principle and the points you're raising. I do however think that we should forget about the copper- LLU in it's current copper obsessed format will be the Wi-Max of fixed line access, unbundle the access sleeves and conduits and let's go fibre (like the rest of the sane world seems to be going)

This makes perfect sense. No worry about the access deficit. Yes, there will be a charge, but it can be even a one time buy out of the conduits. And I am also in favour of overhead fibre as it will drop the installation costs by a huge amount.
 
“That is a very, very strong message we are sending,” said Munzhelele

Yeah, and the message is broadband in this country is farked!
 
“It has to form part of basic like water, roads and electricity to be made available to all,” said Munzhelele.

Government can't even deliver those services consistently...
 
I totally agree with the principle and the points you're raising. I do however think that we should forget about the copper- LLU in it's current copper obsessed format will be the Wi-Max of fixed line access, unbundle the access sleeves and conduits and let's go fibre (like the rest of the sane world seems to be going)

Don't give up on copper - it might be 2nd prize, but it's what most the 1st world runs very well on - if the MSAN roll out completes and VDSL delivers widespread 40mbit, that's a good thing. Remember Telkom's busy doing this right now.

We'd all like fibre, but I think we'd all be pretty chuffed with 40+mbit VDSL. The private sector must come to the party and give us fibre. I'm more than happy for Telkom to provide a copper-based "safety net" until fibre ramps up. An attainable goal busy being implemented right now. Couple that with LLU, and we have a pretty good solution.

Of course while government keeps appointing nincompoops like Reuben September and Pinkie, even a widespread MSAN roll-out seems like a pipe dream.
 
Start off by forcing property developers to install broadband as part of new developments as a standard. Ozzies have been doing it for a while:

http://ozftth.blogspot.com/2010/03/superfast-broadband-for-new.html

Developments usually have all the infrastructure tubing put in when they build - everyone I know that lives in a decade or younger old development has it in theirs - which is why it's quick and easy to wire them up. Telkom are in and out in a few hours, they just feed wires through the underground warrens. There's a few companies doing the fibre access solutions to developments already, example - http://www.smartvillage.co.za/ - unfortuantely they're even more of a ripoff than Telkom, and deliver crap service.

The developers don't really need laws or be inventivised to do this properly, as it's so quick & easy to do while building, it works out cheaper in the long run for them to do it there and then.

Sadly, it's not only the government that can be incompetent :(
 
Last edited:
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X