lets do the math here anyway.
so 2% of users use 40% of the bandwidth they say
the other 98% use less than 3 gigs they say
so we have 1000 users
980 use their entire 3 gigs =2940 gigs
20 use the 40% = 1960 gigs ( 98 gigs per person)
total gigs used by all users(worst case all users use all they can) =4900 gigs for the month
now they implement the 3gig cap, = 3000gigs for the month saving 2900 gigs
now lets say they implement a 10 gig cap, considering only 2% of users exceed 3 gigs we end up with
980 use their entire 3 gigs =2940 gigs
20 use their entire 10 gig= 200 gigs,
total= 3140 gigs , saving of 1760 gigs
cost in gigs to GWI
so uncapped =4900 gigs
3 gig cap= 3000 gigs
10 gig cap= 3140 gigs
hell even with a 30 gig cap its still a signifcant saving
30 gig cap = 3540 gigs
so why such a stupid small cap, if you tell your users they are getting a 30 gig cap, most of them won't flinch at all , an you'll still save yourself 1400 gigs a month!
just a little math, something they should try at gwi
so 2% of users use 40% of the bandwidth they say
the other 98% use less than 3 gigs they say
so we have 1000 users
980 use their entire 3 gigs =2940 gigs
20 use the 40% = 1960 gigs ( 98 gigs per person)
total gigs used by all users(worst case all users use all they can) =4900 gigs for the month
now they implement the 3gig cap, = 3000gigs for the month saving 2900 gigs
now lets say they implement a 10 gig cap, considering only 2% of users exceed 3 gigs we end up with
980 use their entire 3 gigs =2940 gigs
20 use their entire 10 gig= 200 gigs,
total= 3140 gigs , saving of 1760 gigs
cost in gigs to GWI
so uncapped =4900 gigs
3 gig cap= 3000 gigs
10 gig cap= 3140 gigs
hell even with a 30 gig cap its still a signifcant saving
30 gig cap = 3540 gigs
so why such a stupid small cap, if you tell your users they are getting a 30 gig cap, most of them won't flinch at all , an you'll still save yourself 1400 gigs a month!
just a little math, something they should try at gwi