Toadflakz
New Member
Hi there,
Knowing a little about how networking and internet protocols etc, work... I have a question up for discussion:
Telkom says that because the IP addresses of ADSL users are dynamic, they are not able to host web-servers on their machines. Technically, if you look at the traditional way that DNS and domain names are used on the internet, this is perfectly correct. But they have forgotten something...
Routing as far as I know works on the principle that 1 router knows that another router knows where a specific address is. That means that Router A knows that Router B knows where Server C is. Normally, this is implemented by having the address of Server C, as Router B's address in Router A's routing table. DNS also works on the the same principle (as far as I know). DNS resolves to an IP address, and then the routing principle comes into effect. Now... DNS does allow for hosts ie servers, to REGISTER there IP addresses with a DNS Server. So, you have a webserver on ADSL. Its IP changes (as it does with the dynamic load balancing system on ADSL), it then registers its domain name and IP with a particular static (static meaning, not on ADSL, ie static IP) DNS server. As all the routers out there know that only that particular DNS server knows exactly where the webserver is, there is no problem with people trying to find your webserver, as they all have to go through the DNS server to get IP resolution, anyway.
The only problem I can see, is that at the moment, domain name registration requires an IP address to which the domain name is bound. If however, the domain name is bound to the DNS server, and the DNS server acts as a redirector to a particular webserver, this problem could be avoided.
Now, my question: Am I right?
I am interested to hear the comments from people who know. I have a limited knowledge and experience with these particular internet technologies.
-Toadflakz
Knowing a little about how networking and internet protocols etc, work... I have a question up for discussion:
Telkom says that because the IP addresses of ADSL users are dynamic, they are not able to host web-servers on their machines. Technically, if you look at the traditional way that DNS and domain names are used on the internet, this is perfectly correct. But they have forgotten something...
Routing as far as I know works on the principle that 1 router knows that another router knows where a specific address is. That means that Router A knows that Router B knows where Server C is. Normally, this is implemented by having the address of Server C, as Router B's address in Router A's routing table. DNS also works on the the same principle (as far as I know). DNS resolves to an IP address, and then the routing principle comes into effect. Now... DNS does allow for hosts ie servers, to REGISTER there IP addresses with a DNS Server. So, you have a webserver on ADSL. Its IP changes (as it does with the dynamic load balancing system on ADSL), it then registers its domain name and IP with a particular static (static meaning, not on ADSL, ie static IP) DNS server. As all the routers out there know that only that particular DNS server knows exactly where the webserver is, there is no problem with people trying to find your webserver, as they all have to go through the DNS server to get IP resolution, anyway.
The only problem I can see, is that at the moment, domain name registration requires an IP address to which the domain name is bound. If however, the domain name is bound to the DNS server, and the DNS server acts as a redirector to a particular webserver, this problem could be avoided.
Now, my question: Am I right?
I am interested to hear the comments from people who know. I have a limited knowledge and experience with these particular internet technologies.
-Toadflakz