What is it with McBride?

Fazda

Honorary Master
Joined
Apr 24, 2009
Messages
11,414
Reaction score
35
Location
/\/¯¯¯¯¯\/\
This piece of scum keeps popping up in high profile jobs as if he is God's gift to running municipalities!!:mad:

Controversial former Ekurhuleni metro police chief Robert McBride has been shortlisted for the vacant post of head of the Tshwane Metro Council's community safety department.

Sources said McBride, who has a drunken-driving case pending in the Pretoria District Court, is among five candidates shortlisted for the position. It has been vacant since April following the resignation of Commissioner Mpho Mmutle.

http://www.iol.co.za/index.php?set_...wslett=1&em=207415a1a20100721ah&page_number=1
 
Controversial former Ekurhuleni metro police chief Robert McBride has been shortlisted for the vacant post of head of the Tshwane Metro Council's community safety department.


Boggles the mind that someone like this can be considered for these jobs.

I know that the Constitutional Court still has to decide on this, but in my view a pardon doesn't unconvict you, it just pardons you - we will see what the CC says.
 
Last edited:
Makes me sick. And there are people that want us to take this Guavament seriously.
 
Jobs for Pals (comrades) is par for the course with the scumbag ANC.

Police ‘jobs for pals’ promotion slammed

AN Eastern Cape police officer with just Grade 10 and a plumbing certificate was promoted to the rank of colonel last year in what other officers have slammed as a classic “jobs for pals” scandal.

Among the stipulated criteria for the position were that the successful applicant needed an “appropriate three-year tertiary qualification” and three years’ managerial experience – neither of which then captain Zolile Hakula of the Protection and Security Services (PSS) static division in Bhisho had.

Despite this, he was promoted to colonel in October last year after senior police officers allegedly intervened to ensure he was placed in the position.

Although the police have declined to comment on the issue despite being given a week in which to do so, the allegations are supported by documentation which clearly shows the under-qualified officer was promoted over other candidates more suitably qualified for the post.

An investigation by The Herald revealed that despite senior police officers acknowledging that Hakula was unqualified and not the top candidate for the job, he was still promoted and made commander of the unit.


Reliable police sources, who asked to remain nameless, alleged that Hakula was friendly with Layton Tshabalala, a top-ranking commissioner from the police head office in Pretoria, who wrote a letter to his counterpart recommending Hakula for the promotion. On Hakula’s CV, a Tshabalala – also from the PSS unit – and another assistant commissioner are given as references.

The Herald is in possession of documents that show Hakula has a Std 8 (Grade 10) certificate which he acquired in 1985 and a certificate in plumbing he obtained in 1992.

Another discrepancy is that Hakula was admitted into the police in April 1995 at the rank of inspector (now warrant officer) and not as a constable, as is normally the case.

The documents also show Hakula has two previous criminal convictions. They show that in 1998 he was charged with two offences, one for a road traffic violation and another for fraud.

In 2000 he was sentenced and given the option of a R2000 fine or 12 months’ imprisonment.

According to a senior source in the police, a selection panel of high-ranking officers was established to perform score-based assessments of five short-listed candidates. The chairman of the panel was a Commissioner Kulu, who is also allegedly a friend of Tshabalala.

“This is what they (top officials) do to get their friends promoted,” the source said. “Very senior officials make sure their friends are on the panels so they can have some inside information and some leverage on which way the promotion goes and who gets the job.”


The Herald approached the police for comment a week ago, but had not received a reply at the time of going to print.
 
I know that the Constitutional Court still has to decide on this, but in my view a pardon doesn't unconvict you, it just pardons you - we will see what the CC says.

No, Jola.

The effect of a pardon is inter alia the expunging of the criminal record of the offender.
 
No, Jola.

The effect of a pardon is inter alia the expunging of the criminal record of the offender.

And in the case of the ANC scumbag comrades, their understanding is it's a green card to continue with their atrocities.
 
May it never be said that I will cover for this waste of a human skin.

However, I read the article and I am sure it is just another article to fit between advertisements in the papers.

Just another fine newspaper story.
 
You may well be wrong - the Constitutional Court still has to decide (Citizen v McBride).

The legal system works like this, Jola: unless and until a higher court has decided otherwise, the law as it is, applies. Therefore, since the CC has not decided, my post reflects the law as it is :)
 
So we would say that the women at Magoo's were murdered by the coward McBride. He gets a pardon. What would we then say?

I understand you frustration and it shows in the undertone of your post. However, unless and until the legal system is changed, it has to be applied as it stands.

It is called the rule of law and it is the closest we have to a functioning justice system :)
 
I understand you frustration and it shows in the undertone of your post. However, unless and until the legal system is changed, it has to be applied as it stands.

It is called the rule of law and it is the closest we have to a functioning justice system :)

McBride doesn't frustrate me in the slightest - I am very happy to use the language to convey my views. And this is where the law comes unstuck. If I was untruthful in what I stated I'd be foul of the law, but I am not. McBride is a coward - he was told to blow up Natal Command but decided to pick on a soft target, i.e. one that didn't have soldiers. Women were murdered by him - this makes him a murderer. These facts cannot be changed by a casual wave of the hand or pronouncement by a judge.

The granting of a pardon is an administrative process - it doesn't change what had happened. In short, it means that McBride's crimes cannot be used against him in an administrative process. Let's say that murderers are prevented from opening bank accounts - McBride would be able to open a bank account.

The case of the Citizen is interesting in that in order for it to be libel Mc Bride would have to prove that it wasn't a fact that he was a murderer. Of, if the Citizen has to prove that what they say is true all they need to do is point to the court records - which, as far I know, are not expunged.

Also, a pardon is forgiveness. If McBride had been wrongly convicted there would not be a pardon.
 
McBride doesn't frustrate me in the slightest - I am very happy to use the language to convey my views. And this is where the law comes unstuck. If I was untruthful in what I stated I'd be foul of the law, but I am not. McBride is a coward - he was told to blow up Natal Command but decided to pick on a soft target, i.e. one that didn't have soldiers. Women were murdered by him - this makes him a murderer. These facts cannot be changed by a casual wave of the hand or pronouncement by a judge.

The granting of a pardon is an administrative process - it doesn't change what had happened. In short, it means that McBride's crimes cannot be used against him in an administrative process. Let's say that murderers are prevented from opening bank accounts - McBride would be able to open a bank account.

The case of the Citizen is interesting in that in order for it to be libel Mc Bride would have to prove that it wasn't a fact that he was a murderer. Of, if the Citizen has to prove that what they say is true all they need to do is point to the court records - which, as far I know, are not expunged.

Also, a pardon is forgiveness. If McBride had been wrongly convicted there would not be a pardon.

I hear you. However, the legal position remains unchanged and this is what I was conveying to Jola :)
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X