What local telecoms CEOs earn
Local telecoms executives earn millions in salaries and bonuses; here are the numbers
Local telecoms executives earn millions in salaries and bonuses; here are the numbers
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Stoopid question - but what is the restraintive trade payment and why is it so much?
Stoopid question - but what is the restraintive trade payment and why is it so much?
These are majority PRIVATELY owned companies. So even if they do over charge the customers.. I don't really care because we have a choice to support them or not.
However if this was my tax money which a pay a crap loads monthly I wish I could use to buy a house with.. Its an extreeemly different thinking.. Because people in govenment live in luxary with OUR money and we have no choice on that but complain.![]()
Wow you have a choice of ADSL and fixed line providers?These are majority PRIVATELY owned companies. So even if they do over charge the customers.. I don't really care because we have a choice to support them or not.![]()
It's another example of the different rules that are applied at the TopSnout Club.
Mere mortals often have a "Restraint of Trade" Clause in a contract, saying that they cannot go work for a competitor/client doing exactly the same job for a specific period. For example if I work for a consulting company doing a job for a client, I cannot be poached to work directly for that client for a period of say 6-12 months.
It would seem that once you get promoted to CEO level you get paid in advance for the months that you would not be able to work should you decide to leave.
This is in the same category as CEO pay which increase as the companies performance worsens. As performance decreases the CEOs job becomes more difficult, ergo the pay increases. Then once performance improves the CEO will get a big bonus for the results. If the CEO gets fired because they couldn't turn the company around they will receive the balance of pay for the remainder of their contract. It's genius it really is...
No matter how cr@ppy the companies' service, how much we b!tch and complain on this forum, it is not going to reduce their "salaries", so just accept it and go on to reading something more relevant.
I've also always taken that for granted, that if I leave my current employer I can't work for a competitor for a period... but it would be interesting to hear views that if the only job you can get is at a competitor, why you are not allowed to accept it? Constitutional wise, can you be prevented from earning a living by your ex-employer? If so then they need to compensate you for staying at home for that period in order to protect their interests? Like I said, I always just accepted that because I accepted their employment terms and conditions I was bound by that rule, but hey if I have a bond to pay and family to support can they enforce that?Mere mortals often have a "Restraint of Trade" Clause in a contract, saying that they cannot go work for a competitor/client doing exactly the same job for a specific period. For example if I work for a consulting company doing a job for a client, I cannot be poached to work directly for that client for a period of say 6-12 months.
...
This may be a stupid question, but...why does the Vodacom MD make more than the CEO?
Telkom CEO Reuben September = R 12 827 648
MTN CEO Phuthuma Nhleko = R 19 958 000
Vodacom CEO Pieter Uys = R 10 468 444