South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
I found C a pleasure to work in. C++, on the other hand, can run away and die a slow death in my opinion.
I think you may have misread my sentence.
Odom said:Also a lot of programs that need to be as efficient as possible require you to manipulate lots of extra stuff cause the generic components a managed language uses to do it just aren't efficient enough.
Odom said:Also [-]a lot of[/-] very few programs that need to be as efficient as possible require you to manipulate lots of extra stuff cause the generic components a managed language uses to do it just aren't efficient enough.
You sound like a very procedural kinda guy - check out COBOL.
Was that a stab at what I earn?Because 90% of people write Line Of Business applications, not mission critical stuff like you.
If very easy to make mistakes doing custom memory management/reference counting and the like. Just read Raymond Chen's The Old New Thing and you'll see the effort required by the Windows Shell team to cater for the mistakes people make.
If you take that out of the equation you can concentrate on the part of the program that makes you money => functionality.
At the end of the day it's all about using the right tool for the job. And for the majority of people out there that's not unmanaged C++.
Was that a stab at what I earn?![]()
I think you're misunderstanding.
Relevant question on StackOverflow, interesting answers...
What is the most suitable for writing a high speed server C, C++ or C# ?