Whatever you do, don't win the lottery!

VioletF

Senior Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2010
Messages
580
Reaction score
1
Location
Cape Town
Thought this was very interesting. Looks like I've managed to dodge several bullets so far. :D

So you didn't win the lottery? That's fantastic news, says behavioral economics.

You'll probably find nothing in classical economics that tells you winning $500 million is bad. No sentence, no theory, no lesson. Nada. Money is a pretty good thing. You can use it to buy stuff. Stuff you want. Stuff that will bring happiness to you and the people you love. You don't need an econometrics class to know that sounds alright.

Here's the problem. A fuller understanding of motivation and money reveals a different picture of lottery winners. This isn't your old-fashioned "Money can't buy happiness" lesson.* This is your slightly newer "Winning the lottery can make you miserable" lesson.

To start, there's nothing wrong with buying a lottery ticket, so long as you understand what you're buying. When you buy a ticket in a $500 million lottery, your chances of winning are, roughly, one divided by infinity. You aren't buying a chance to win, because there is really no probability that you will win. You are buying the right to fantasize about winning. And that's okay.

It's winning that can get you in trouble.

Happiness is relative. This fact (or theory, really, since happiness studies is a fluid science) explains all sorts of surprising observations, such as why poor countries are as happy as rich countries; why Americans aren't more joyous than we were 40 years ago, despite considerably more money and better technology; and why, after some time, paraplegics and people who go blind in middle-age report average levels of life satisfaction.

It also explains the downside of awesome experiences -- or what psychologists call peak experiences. "The good thing about peak experiences is that they make us happy while we are having them, but the bad thing is that they then serve as a standard of comparison for all the experiences that follow," Harvard psychologist Daniel Gilbert explained. "When researchers looked at lottery winners, they weren't happier than a control group, but they did take less pleasure in everyday events. The big happiness rush you get when you receive the big check is gone pretty soon, and then when good things happen you find yourself saying, 'That was nice but it wasn't like the day I won the lottery.'"

In a well-known 1978 study from Northwestern University, researchers surveyed a small group of major lottery winners, paralyzed accident victims, and a control group. They found two surprising things about lottery winners. Not only were they not happier than the controls, but also they "took significantly less pleasure from a series of mundane events," which is rather unfortunate, considering that most of life consists of a series of non-extraordinary events. Crucially, it was determined that the lottery winners' blasé attitude was not due to "preexisting differences between people who buy or do not buy lottery tickets," suggesting that the lottery victory itself changed their perspective.

What's going on? It's all about the psychological power of adaptation and relativity with money. Adaptation: At first, the thrill of becoming millions of dollars richer is, well thrilling, but after a while, the thrill wears off. Relativity: Winning the lottery creates an indelible memory, a comparison point, that makes typical life events seem disappointing and boring. Money can buy happiness, if you know how to spend it, but the incidence of winning the lottery does not, on its own, buy much happiness at all. In the long-term, it can be a net cost to life satisfaction.

So, you didn't win the lottery? Of course you didn't. Best news of your life.
____________

*Because it's not true. Money can buy happiness. It just buys less happiness, per dollar, after you blow by $70,000 or so, and people are better at buying what satisfies their momentary urges than what brings them long-term satisfaction.

http://www.theatlantic.com/business...nning-a-500-million-lottery-seriously/265709/
 
Last edited:
What about if you win and you become a philanthropist?

You use the money for good and not only for self? I can sure argue that that would give you a huge boost.

At the end of the day it probably depends on your grounding as a human being. Are you a selfish bastard or a sharer in your good fortune?
 
What about if you win and you become a philanthropist?

You use the money for good and not only for self? I can sure argue that that would give you a huge boost.

If I had to win $500mil I would invest a lot of it and give the proceeds away.
 
Most people who win spend spend spend. I would love to use that money for investing purposes. Making money out of money, businesses and real estate. Just for the thrill of it. I would rather buy assets than luxuries.
 
F-that! I still want to win! :D
Yes, me too. I'd love the chance to find it out for myself. :D

What about if you win and you become a philanthropist?

You use the money for good and not only for self? I can sure argue that that would give you a huge boost.
Yes - but the point of the article is that nothing you'll experience afterward will compare to the way you felt when you won that money.

Most people who win spend spend spend.
It's hard to know beforehand how you would react if you got such a lot of money all at once... And if you're not used to having money it will be hard to avoid falling into the SPEND SPEND SPEND trap. Especially if friends and family found out. :P

I'd probably immediately put 80% away where I couldn't get at it for at least a year. Maybe with a small monthly payout, or something, just to get used to the idea.

By the way - I particularly liked this part. :)
You aren't buying a chance to win, because there is really no probability that you will win. You are buying the right to fantasize about winning. And that's okay.
 
It would be more interesting if they compared lottery winners vs people who were wealthy because of other reasons.

Like, lottery winners vs businessmen who had made it big vs people who had inherited millions.

Is it being wealthy that makes "mundane" experiences less enjoyable? Or is it the act of becoming wealthy overnight instead of working hard for your millions?
 
$500million is a rediculous amount and surely that will numb you from every pleasurable experience normal life could bring. My fantasies of winning the lotto were always R30million when we have the big draws, which is a lot but not rediculous. You still have to invest it wisely. For instance, you can go a long way investing R10million in properties to rent out, give away R10 million to family and friends, invest R5 million long term and keep R5 million as liquid capital and on luxuries. Or you can go and buy a R25million mansion and a Rolls Royce. Depends on how you use it. I would do the former and still work full time and use the money for earlier retirement and a good future for my family. Maybe less than R10million to friends an family. Heck, R5 million would do nicely as a jackpot
 
My firm has defended several clients in SA and in England who have let the sudden wealth get to their heads in the most amazing way. In all cases, common sense went by the by and the money was gone in an staggeringly short time. One man in Dundee won £30 million and it all went in 4 years. His wife left and went to stay with her daughter and in the end cocaine was the cause of him attempting to murder two girls who he had persuaded to stay with him. He is presently serving an 8 year sentence. His words to the QC defending him was that winning the lottery was the worst thing that had ever happened to him.

So don't even buy a ticket, buy a chocolate instead.
 
one can imagine, that $500 mil could be too much... imo there is such a thing as too much money :-)
for sure, with the right frame of mind, you can sure do a hell of a lot with so much munny, certainly in so much as being able to share it, not with the freeloaders in your friend/family circles, but to pass it to bring some much needed joy or relief to total strangers. Of course you could really spread some goodness and blessings around!
but i dunno... R50mil or so would be a good amount to me... more than that, especially these guys who win >100 mil pounds, i'm guessing you could end up becoming a slave or prisoner of your money... always feeling like you need to watch your back, look over your shoulder, always worrying about you or your close family's safety, as it could become a very real risk to have people close to you taken hostage for money.
i guess, keeping a low profile, and not flaunting your riches too much, would be the answer.
 
I know someone who won, and now sits around all day watching tv, playing games.... Yeah that sounds like fun. You need to use the money to open doors that otherwise wouldn't be opened, but you still need goals.

Another downside is that you're probably going to lose a lot of friends, because everyone is going to expect a chunk

Other wise I'm sure I can cope with $500 mil.
 
I know someone who won, and now sits around all day watching tv, playing games.... Yeah that sounds like fun. You need to use the money to open doors that otherwise wouldn't be opened, but you still need goals.

Another downside is that you're probably going to lose a lot of friends, because everyone is going to expect a chunk

Other wise I'm sure I can cope with $500 mil.

I would venture to say that they weren't real friends then. I certainly don't want friends who would only want to be friends due to my fortune. Not that I have any experience of that though.

At the end of the day I will still believe it has to do with your moral fibre. If you really know yourself and know of the dangers you can manage it in a worthwhile manner. As with everything in life, it depends on the individual.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X