BBSA
Honorary Master
- Joined
- Jul 11, 2005
- Messages
- 30,227
- Reaction score
- 28,804
- Location
- People's Republic of South Africa
South Africa’s biggest forum. Discuss, discover, and connect with thousands of members.
Amazing when a quick Google search shows they are the second largest agricultural related exporter. I.e farming equipment as well
As I already said Rickets declined due to the addition of Vitamin D. Have never heard of GMOs having anything to do with it. I also take these claims with a sack of salt nowadays. Just like with the wild banana claim if you go back far enough you'll probably find the "domestic" variant always existed. History isn't written down like a novel and people can make lots of claims that are unsupported.huh? it did succeed, rickets declined.
also,
As I already said Rickets declined due to the addition of Vitamin D. Have never heard of GMOs having anything to do with it. I also take these claims with a sack of salt nowadays. Just like with the wild banana claim if you go back far enough you'll probably find the "domestic" variant always existed. History isn't written down like a novel and people can make lots of claims that are unsupported.
And he's analysed that data? How many people with no health issues are visiting this endocrinologist?Eureka is the only flour which doesn't give me health problems. Eating the normal flour bread gives me respiratory and other health issues.
Went to Europe last year in countries with more GMO restrictive laws, I could eat everything without needing to read labels, or feel **** for the next 8h.
My Endocrinologist told me to stop eating pasta, bread etc. I asked him , but how Italians , French and others live on such a diet healthily, he said GMO. And he is all for science, just he have huge data base of patiences with health issues, getting glutten intoleranse and other allergies , which used to be very rare and now are very common.
source for this?People don't seem to realise that organic farming uses some very nasty chemicals. They're both dangerous and polluting, but get a green light because they come from nature rather than being invented by humans.
People don't seem to realise that organic farming uses some very nasty chemicals. They're both dangerous and polluting, but get a green light because they come from nature rather than being invented by humans.
Subsistence farming is inefficient and generally a bad idea if your aim is to feed a lot of people.
There may well be excessive usage of pesticides and herbicides, but the culprit isn't so much whether crops are genetically modified as whether farming is being done by massive agribusiness that has a general disregard for the environment and the long term health of those who consume the food, caring only about short term profit. Take away crops modified in a laboratory and you'd still have a similar problem.
If cancer rates are growing there could be myriad reasons and it is not possible to simply pin it on genetic modification of crops.
And he's analysed that data? How many people with no health issues are visiting this endocrinologist?
It isn't really possible to discount placebo/nocebo in these scenarios. People who imagine they are gluten intolerant will get sick when they eat something they believe contains gluten regardless of whether it does or their has any real intolerance.
Source please?No organic never uses pesticides... Don't be daft it uses complimentary farming and the tears of angels.
Source please?
Read your own article the guy keeps on talking about how there is no data and throws up one anecdote. It's in human nature to try and BS the system so some people will screw with organic stuff especially the government screwing with the very definition of what organic even means. This in no way means organic = bad and GMO = good.Is your keyboard broken? Or just the device between it and the chair? Look for Spinosad, sulphur as as pesticides and you'll start realising that it's not all birds and bees.
One link
https://www.washingtonpost.com/life...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.cb9d145a0d4b
When did this happen?Then you get the good guys like Eureka Mills threatened to remove their Non-GMO labeling off their flour packs, or PicknPay won’t stock their products. Ridiculous!
No organic never uses pesticides... Don't be daft it uses complimentary farming and the tears of angels.
Gluten is a well known stresser (even organic) this goes for everybody. The reason why it never affected people in the past is that they processed their flours and breads a little differently. BTW The rise in cancer rates is attributed to over consumption of sugar.People don't seem to realise that organic farming uses some very nasty chemicals. They're both dangerous and polluting, but get a green light because they come from nature rather than being invented by humans.
Subsistence farming is inefficient and generally a bad idea if your aim is to feed a lot of people.
There may well be excessive usage of pesticides and herbicides, but the culprit isn't so much whether crops are genetically modified as whether farming is being done by massive agribusiness that has a general disregard for the environment and the long term health of those who consume the food, caring only about short term profit. Take away crops modified in a laboratory and you'd still have a similar problem.
If cancer rates are growing there could be myriad reasons and it is not possible to simply pin it on genetic modification of crops.
And he's analysed that data? How many people with no health issues are visiting this endocrinologist?
It isn't really possible to discount placebo/nocebo in these scenarios. People who imagine they are gluten intolerant will get sick when they eat something they believe contains gluten regardless of whether it does or their has any real intolerance.
Oh right, forgot that, they just going to go target the normal crops then.you are being ridiculous, pests simply respect organic crops and dont eat them.
More than one billion acres of farmland around the world have been used to grow crops that have been genetically engineered with proteins from the soil bacteriumBacillus thuringiensis (Bt).
The Bt protein’s insecticidal properties allow farmers to control pests without having to spray their fields with harmful chemicals. But the use of Bt crops has been criticized by opponents of agricultural biotechnology who say that they could have unintended effects on non-target organisms, including insects that may pose no danger to the crops but prey upon those do. This perceived threat has led to accusations that Bt crops damage ecosystems.
A comprehensive analysis of glyphosate - the most widely used weed-killing chemical in the world - reveals that those with the highest exposures to the popular herbicide have a 41% increased risk of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) cancer.
Next France should look at this as well. As anyone being GM free is silly.South Australian Government moves to strike down ban on GMO....
https://mobile.abc.net.au/news/2019...NhDop9oIB0BoN8seTpvnYyVIAa1vKSE6rfU2HFQaA2O5c