I’m looking at a feature that isn’t active useless someone sets it up.
If you’re bringing in the first public DNS service to offer the ability, then you might as well bring in their app?
Android does iOS beat in the mobile network aspect though, without a VPN or profile configuration you can’t control your DNS there
Quad9 was actually first in 2017, I don't believe they have or had an app, I stand to he corrected though. Indeed though, DoT is useless unless it's configured.
Google felt in 2017 during Android 9 development that DoT was an important enough privacy feature to be implemented, while Apple didn't until two years later. I don't believe a 3rd party app should be used to gauge features or capabilities of an OS.
What irks me though is when a person makes a comment they use iPhone because it has better privacy than Android, what is the comment based on, or is it just an echo chamber for the iPhone fans? I would bet the vast majority of people that say they use an iphone for better privacy don't have a clue what that actually means, and this goes for Android users as well. They are probably all on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and Twitter. They probably don't use a privacy VPN. They probably don't use Dot or DoH. They probably happily use Google and Gmail services, and other online services and location services.
It sort of reminds me of the argument between Windows and Linux. The Linux fans would always use the argument "If there's a bug or security issue in Linux, I can download the code and fix it, therefore Linux is better". Truth is, 99.999% of these people haven't got a clue how to debug, code and rebuild Linix, and a small percentage may download a patch and run that, which is no different to running a Windows Update. The chance of the majority of these "Linux is better because I can fix it" users fixing a security exploit is zero to none and for the average Linux user, it's a moot comment.