Why SEACOM launched a consumer ISP

Layer 2 and 3 is anti competitive. Should not be allowed IMHO.
 
Layer 2 and 3 is anti competitive. Should not be allowed IMHO.

If they get transit over their own cable for extra cheap and there are no alternative then yes but most of Seacom traffic for EUW goes via WACS anyways.
 
If they get transit over their own cable for extra cheap and there are no alternative then yes but most of Seacom traffic for EUW goes via WACS anyways.
This the provider who also stopped smaller ISP's peering with them unless they purchased traffic through them. They turn back the clock to the old days of anti competitive behaviour.
 
I saw Macrolan as having a strong WISP foundation (in their early days) and a strong corporate focus, so it is interesting to see them positioned as the foundation for a differentiated consumer ISP with a 'fibre heritage'.

That said I had a lost of respect for Macrolan and for Steve Briggs and look forward to seeing how this plays out in the (very competitive) residential market.
 
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X