Why Solar is Not a F__up: Debunking Misconceptions

3WA said:
Solar is awesome! I use it for heating and clothes drying.

Heating, I just let the sun shine on my skin. Clothes, I hang outside in the sun.

Also used it in a pinch to defrost a chicken.
Click to expand...
this-is-the-way-mandalorian (1).gif
 
Lupus said:
How many panels did you put in? As I'm still using about 300 units a month from City Power, that's basically geyser and stove, or days like today where it switched at 8am to pull from the grid as the clouds are hectic.
Click to expand...
14x 545 watt panels.
Keep in mind our daytime usage is high but in the evenings our baseload is around 350w so our batteries carries us throughout the night. Both my geysers and stove is electrical
 
solar is f_ K up a) its not affordable b) you need a lot of batteries for when the sun dont shine c) the sun doesnt always shine, we should have gone nuclear long ago but i guess we got an even bigger fup in eskom.
 
Confirm or debunk that the technologies involved for battery systems are greatly environment intensive and damaging.
 
alanlesley said:
solar is f_ K up a) its not affordable b) you need a lot of batteries for when the sun dont shine c) the sun doesnt always shine, we should have gone nuclear long ago but i guess we got an even bigger fup in eskom.
Click to expand...
I appreciate your feedback, but I respectfully disagree with your assessment of solar energy. Here are my counterpoints to your arguments:

a) Affordability: While it's true that solar panels and installation costs can be high, the long-term savings from using solar power can be significant. In fact, the cost of solar panels has dropped by more than 70% over the past decade, making it more affordable than ever before. Additionally, solar energy reduces reliance on fossil fuels, which are subject to price volatility and market fluctuations. So, in the long run, solar energy can actually save you money on your monthly energy bills.

b) Battery storage: While it's true that solar panels generate power only when the sun shines, advances in battery technology have made it easier to store excess energy for later use. This means that homeowners and businesses can use solar energy even when the sun isn't shining. Moreover, new technologies are being developed to improve battery efficiency and reduce costs further.

c) Dependence on sunlight: While it's true that the sun doesn't always shine, that doesn't mean solar energy is not viable. Solar energy can still be a significant source of power, even in areas with less sunshine. Moreover, solar panels can be installed in a variety of settings, from residential homes to commercial buildings and even in space, making it a versatile and adaptable energy source that can meet a wide range of needs.

Finally, regarding your point about nuclear energy, while it is a powerful energy source, it also poses significant risks to public safety and the environment. Nuclear energy requires careful management of radioactive materials and can have long-term health and environmental impacts. Moreover, the cost of nuclear power plants is often high, making it less accessible to individuals and small businesses.

In conclusion, while every energy source has its own advantages and disadvantages, I believe that solar energy is a viable and sustainable solution that can help us address some of the world's most pressing challenges.
 
etienne_marais said:
Confirm or debunk that the technologies involved for battery systems are greatly environment intensive and damaging.
Click to expand...
Good thing I'm sitting behind my Computer and not replying from my cellphone.

It is true that battery technologies do have some environmental impacts, and it is important to considr these impacts when assessing the sustainability of solar power. However, it is also important to note that these impacts can be mitigated through proper design, management, and recycling practices.
One of the most significan environmental impacts of batteries is the mining and processing of the materials needed to manufacture them. For example- lithium-ion batteries, which are commonly used in solar energy systems, require the extraction of minerals such as lithium, cobalt, and nickel which can have negative environmental and social consequences. However, there are efforts underway to develop more sustainable and responsible mining practices, such as reducing the use of toxic chemicals and improving labor standards.
Another concern is the disposal of batteries at the end of their life cycle. If not managed properly, batteries can release toxic chemicals into the environment. However, many battery manufacturers have implemented recycling programs to ensure that batteries are properly disposed of and that valuable materials are recovered for reuse. Additionally, research is ongoing to develop new battery chemistries that are more environmentally friendly and can be recycled more easily.

While there are certainly environmental impacts associated with battery technologies, it is important to recognize that these impacts can be addressed through responsible design, management, and recycling practices.
 
Benedict A55h0le said:
The problem is the ANC and DA is taxing the sun, "THE JUST ENERGY TRANSITION".
Click to expand...
You are also being taxed on the electricity you buy or pay for every month and the fuel you put into you're vehicle etc. How is it different?
 
eepr0m said:
I appreciate your feedback, but I respectfully disagree with your assessment of solar energy. Here are my counterpoints to your arguments:

a) Affordability: While it's true that solar panels and installation costs can be high, the long-term savings from using solar power can be significant. In fact, the cost of solar panels has dropped by more than 70% over the past decade, making it more affordable than ever before. Additionally, solar energy reduces reliance on fossil fuels, which are subject to price volatility and market fluctuations. So, in the long run, solar energy can actually save you money on your monthly energy bills.

b) Battery storage: While it's true that solar panels generate power only when the sun shines, advances in battery technology have made it easier to store excess energy for later use. This means that homeowners and businesses can use solar energy even when the sun isn't shining. Moreover, new technologies are being developed to improve battery efficiency and reduce costs further.

c) Dependence on sunlight: While it's true that the sun doesn't always shine, that doesn't mean solar energy is not viable. Solar energy can still be a significant source of power, even in areas with less sunshine. Moreover, solar panels can be installed in a variety of settings, from residential homes to commercial buildings and even in space, making it a versatile and adaptable energy source that can meet a wide range of needs.

Finally, regarding your point about nuclear energy, while it is a powerful energy source, it also poses significant risks to public safety and the environment. Nuclear energy requires careful management of radioactive materials and can have long-term health and environmental impacts. Moreover, the cost of nuclear power plants is often high, making it less accessible to individuals and small businesses.

In conclusion, while every energy source has its own advantages and disadvantages, I believe that solar energy is a viable and sustainable solution that can help us address some of the world's most pressing challenges.
Click to expand...
a) if its so affordable, why cant i afford it? can anyone spend 150k to get a 8kw power system? please only people that can afford it are rich people.

b) can you run you geyser,stove, hair dryer and air con etc on battery with fing up their life span? you are still dependent other ways to create energy.

c) how many more solar panels will you need to capture that extra energy that you required.

d) nuclear energy is way safe than solar and wind energy. wind and solar parts are toxic to the environment

e) are you using chatgpt or something you sound like Bot.

f) u
 
alanlesley said:
a) if its so affordable, why cant i afford it? can anyone spend 150k to get a 8kw power system? please only people that can afford it are rich people.

b) can you run you geyser,stove, hair dryer and air con etc on battery with fing up their life span? you are still dependent other ways to create energy.

c) how many more solar panels will you need to capture that extra energy that you required.

d) nuclear energy is way safe than solar and wind energy. wind and solar parts are toxic to the environment

e) are you using chatgpt or something you sound like Bot.

f) u
Click to expand...
b. My whole house, geysers, oven stove everything run on it.

URGH im getting out of this thread now. As its just becoming a combo of the other thread!
 
i to can use chatgpt : While nuclear energy does pose certain risks, it also has many benefits that cannot be overlooked. Nuclear energy is a reliable, cost-effective and environmentally friendly source of power that provides a constant supply of electricity without producing harmful emissions that contribute to climate change. Nuclear power plants have a low carbon footprint and occupy relatively small areas of land compared to other forms of energy production. In addition, the safety measures in place at nuclear power plants are stringent and designed to minimize accidents. Furthermore, nuclear power can play a key role in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and promoting a more sustainable future. While it may not be the only solution to our energy needs, nuclear energy should be considered as a valuable part of a diversified energy mix.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter
X