Why your data is really disappearing

In the early days of Vodacom even your airtime would disappear. And I'm not talking wisps but rather you'll have R1.20 and the next week it would be like R1.05 without making any calls. A friend of mine showed me his balance of 1c thinking it was a record and I showed him mine of -1c.
 
Swa said:
Routers count the bytes. If it doesn't give you an accurate reading there's something wrong with it. Networks estimate your usage by what you download and then apply a formula. Cell C charges for only about 95%. Vodacom is more accurate like 98-99% but there's been times they overestimate it as well.
Click to expand...

I’ll just leave you to think what you think. The reality is quite different.
 
Lord Farquart said:
Most news sites wait for other people to call their BS. MyBB must be the only one where they call their own BS.:unsure: I can link you to at least one article, written by yourself, where you proved data is disappearing.

Sometimes not flogging a dead horse article is the better option.
Click to expand...

MTN were charging for a network event they shouldn't have on LTE connections (and it wasn't lots and lots of data), that was fixed by MTN and further tests revealed it has stopped happening. It wasn't happening on the other 3 providers tested.

So they have proven data on MTN has stopped disappearing, and never even happened on the other 3. So where is the BS?
 
Swa said:
Routers count the bytes. If it doesn't give you an accurate reading there's something wrong with it. Networks estimate your usage by what you download and then apply a formula. Cell C charges for only about 95%. Vodacom is more accurate like 98-99% but there's been times they overestimate it as well.
Click to expand...
"Networks" also count the bytes. There is no estimation.
 
supersunbird said:
MTN were charging for a network event they shouldn't have on LTE connections (and it wasn't lots and lots of data), that was fixed by MTN and further tests revealed it has stopped happening. It wasn't happening on the other 3 providers tested.

So they have proven data on MTN has stopped disappearing, and never even happened on the other 3. So where is the BS?
Click to expand...
Headline says data is disappearing, then I quoted him where he says it is not disappearing. And I can link to articles where he proved it was disappearing. So which is it? It can only be the one or the other.
 
Lord Farquart said:
Headline says data is disappearing, then I quoted him where he says it is not disappearing. And I can link to articles where he proved it was disappearing. So which is it? It can only be the one or the other.
Click to expand...

It's not disappearing to nowhere, that's where the "really" in the headline matters, it's actually being used by the customer. Link us to that article and we will see it WAS only MTN. So his statement is not BS anyway for the other networks.
 
supersunbird said:
I cannot. Maybe the author of the article can investigate and ask Telkom, so ask them. And doesn't change the fact that nothing is disappearing.
Click to expand...

Ask Telkom why data is used on other providers but not them? :unsure:
 
Swa said:
So why is there never an accurate count?
Click to expand...
There is. The count in the network.

Your question is probably "Why will an app counting on the device not align to the network count?"

It's a function of where the different systems count in the stack.
 
jannievanzyl said:
There is. The count in the network.

Your question is probably "Why will an app counting on the device not align to the network count?"

It's a function of where the different systems count in the stack.
Click to expand...

As much as he spins, Jannie is right this time. Networks have detailed and accurate usage and time logs for all packets entering/exiting the network.
 
jannievanzyl said:
There is. The count in the network.

Your question is probably "Why will an app counting on the device not align to the network count?"

It's a function of where the different systems count in the stack.
Click to expand...
You makes no sense. The network count is always different from the actual count. If it was 100% accurate why is there then a formula applied to reduce usage?
 
Swa said:
You makes no sense. The network count is always different from the actual count. If it was 100% accurate why is there then a formula applied to reduce usage?
Click to expand...

There are no formulas applied anywhere. And Jannie stated that above.
 
Swa said:
You makes no sense. The network count is always different from the actual count. If it was 100% accurate why is there then a formula applied to reduce usage?
Click to expand...
There are no formulas applied.

Can you please explain where you get that from?
 
jannievanzyl said:
There are no formulas applied.

Can you please explain where you get that from?
Click to expand...
The simple fact that not everything "measured" is charged for. Some networks more than others. So are you saying it's not counted or there is a formula? It can't be both ways as then there would be an accurate count.
 
Swa said:
The simple fact that not everything "measured" is charged for. Some networks more than others. So are you saying it's not counted or there is a formula? It can't be both ways as then there would be an accurate count.
Click to expand...
No,

Everything is counted. Always.

Then billing rules are applied as some data is zero-rated.

So there is no 'formula' per se'.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top
Sign up to the MyBroadband newsletter